A Laboratory Experiment for the Estimation of Health Risks: Policy Recommendations

  • A. DrichoutisEmail author
  • P. Koundouri
  • K. Remoundou
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 7)


Environmental health hazards in Asopos River Basin (RB) rise concerns on health risk not only for the residents of the catchment but also for the consumers of the area’s products across the country. As a result, the focus of this chapter is on the estimation of theses health risks. In order to assess the social cost from consuming products produced in an area where water resources are not in good condition a lab experimental auction has been conducted. According to the details of the experiment presented at the beginning of the chapter all participants were asked to bid to exchange a product from region A (the polluted one) with a similar product from a region in a good ecological status (in the terminology of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD)), region B. After the presentation of the employed methodology econometric analysis was conducted. The output of this analysis is an average Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for the specific sample of consumers. WTP represents the maximum amount of money a person would be willing to pay in order to receive a good or avoid an undesired impact. The chapter concludes with policy recommendations and suggests that unless an epidemiology study confirms the health hazards from consuming agricultural products cultivated in the area of Asopos (area similar to the characteristics of region A), the estimated amount is a net cost suffered by the local farmers and compensation measures have to be adopted.


Environmental health hazards Asopos River Basin Estimation of health risks Experimental auction Willingness-to-Pay 


  1. Aldrich, L. (1994). Food safety policy: Balancing risk and costs. Food Review, the magazine of food economics, May–August 1994, pp. 9–13. U.S.D.A., Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  2. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2000). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. 1997/0067 (COD), C5-0347/00.Google Scholar
  3. Costa-front, G., Gil, G. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Florax, R. J., Travisi, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2005). A meta-analysis of the willingness to pay for reductions in pesticide risk exposure. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32, 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1998). Methodological approaches to assessing risk perceptions associated with food related hazards. Risk Analysis, 18, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lusk, J. L., & Shogren, J. F. (2007). Experimental auctions: Methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30, 28–44.Google Scholar
  8. Morkbak, M. R., Christensen, T., & Gyrd-Hansen, D. (2008). Valuation of food safety in meat – A review of stated preference studies. Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C, 5, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nayga, R. M., Jr. (1996). Determinants of consumers’ use of nutritional information on food packages. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28(2), 303–312.Google Scholar
  10. Rozan, A., Stenger, A., & Willinger, M. (2004). Willingness-to-pay for food safety: an experimental investigation of quality certification on bidding behaviour. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stenger, A. (2000). Experimental valuation of food safety, application to sewage sludge. Food Policy, 25, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  3. 3.Aberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations