Skip to main content

Eco-Innovation at the “Bottom of the Pyramid”

Part of the Greening of Industry Networks Studies book series (GINS,volume 3)

Abstract

The projected exponential rise in the 80 % of humanity living on less than $10 a day (largely in the developing world) – the so-called “bottom of pyramid (BoP)”’ – suggests that their behavior, lifestyle and consumption patterns will increasingly affect the global economy and society as a whole. While sustainability is a well-established concept in the developed world, understanding of perceptions and approaches to sustainability at the BoP (and associated behavior) is limited. In particular there is little understanding of whether this vast pool of people across the globe “eco-innovate”, and if so how and why. This chapter provides an overview of the main theoretical discussions about innovation and development, with particular attention to eco-innovation creation, transfer and diffusion at the BoP. We challenge the assumption that the “poor are too poor to eco-innovate”, hypothesizing that eco-innovation in the so-called South could play an important role in contributing to global sustainability. The fascinating point in such a debate is whether or not those at the BoP will be able to trigger a change of paradigm on a global basis, pioneering alternative development models that could “blowback” to the developed world. Through an analysis of empirical cases in Asia and Latin America, we demonstrate that eco-innovation does occur at different levels at the BoP, exploiting local potential, traditional knowledge and international connections. We discuss its potential to facilitate social inclusion and support environmental sustainability. These case studies allow us to propose some characteristics of the BOP eco-innovation process, including technological transfer, diffusion and adaptation. We consider their social dimension and the role of international cooperation, leading to development of a conceptual model as a starting point to describe the landscape, purposes and the drivers of eco-innovation at the BoP. These cases suggest that new business models and new policies that foster grassroots eco-innovation might not only be relevant for developing countries, but offer transfer potential from the “south” to the “north” (innovation “blowback”), notably in the context of the extended current period of financial austerity faced by developed countries and the global sustainability crisis faced by us all.

Keywords

  • Eco-innovation
  • Bottom of Pyramid (BOP)
  • Grassroots innovation
  • South
  • Blowback

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7633-3_15
  • Chapter length: 21 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-7633-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 15.1
Fig. 15.2
Fig. 15.3

References

  • Aidindia. (2012). Hydel project. Retrieved from http://aidindia.org/projects/illus/bilgaon/bilgaon.htm

  • Anderson, J., & Markides, C. (2007). Strategic innovation at the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(49116), 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1995). Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In C. A. Perrings (Ed.), Biodiversity conservation (pp. 281–299). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (2005). Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Craig, T., & Hart, S. (2001). The great disruption. Foreign Affairs, 80(2), 80–95. Profile Books London.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaviotas. (2012). Centro las Gaviotas. Retrieved from http://www.centrolasgaviotas.org/

  • George, G., McGahan, A. M., Prabhu, J., & Macgahan, A. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 662–683.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: Create far from home, win everywhere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grameen. (2012). Grameen Shakti. Retrieved from http://www.gshakti.org/

  • Gupta, A. (2007). Global GIAN: Online and off line incubation of grassroots innovations and traditional knowledge: Towards Tianjin declaration. Ahmedabad. Retrieved from http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/publications/data/2007-07-06AnilGupta.pdf

  • Gupta, A. (2009, Dec). Seduce the scientist. Farming matters (p. 17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2010). Grass green innovations for inclusive, sustainable development. In A. Lopez-Claros (Ed.), The innovation for development report (pp. 137–146). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2012). Green innovation and sustainability through grassroots’ collaborative networks in the south: A case study of patented intermediate technologies in rural South-Asia. This book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (2011). Taking the green leap to the base of the pyramid. In T. London & S. L. Hart (Eds.), Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid. New approaches for building mutual value (pp. 79–101). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., & Christensen, C. (2002). The great leap. Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • HPS. (2012). Husk power systems. Retrieved from http://www.huskpowersystems.com/

  • Immelt, J. R., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2009). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 87(10), 56–66. Harvard Business School Publication Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEM. (2012). Hiinem. Retrieved from http://www.hiinem.com

  • Jenkins, T. N. (2000). Putting postmodernity into practice: Endogenous development and the role of traditional cultures in the rural development of marginal regions. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 301–313.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kandachar, P., & Halme, M. (2007). An exploratory journey towards the research and practice of the “Base of the Pyramid. Greener Management International, 51, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (2008). Transforming giants. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 43–52, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. (2008). Globalisation, inequality and climate change: What difference does China make? Geography Compass, 2(1), 67–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. (2011). Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy, 40(2), 193–203.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2007a). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2007b). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: A mirage. Business, 49(4), 48109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2009). The bottom of the pyramid strategy for reducing poverty: A failed promise. Selling, 80, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (1980). Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: A model. Research Policy, 9(3), 254–277.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Smith, A., & Thompson, J., et~al. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Retrieved from http://steps-centre.org/wpsite/wp-content/uploads/Transforming-Innovation.pdf

  • London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, T., & Anupindi, R. (2011). Using the base-of-the-pyramid perspective to catalyze interdependence-based collaborations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 17, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Alier, J. (1995). The environment as a luxury good or “too poor to be green”? Ecological Economics, 13(1), 1–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (2008). Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 912–913.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MyShelter Foundation. (2012). Liter of light. Retrieved from http://isanglitrongliwanag.org/

  • Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P. M., Fishe, E., & Gorman, M. (2012). In R. Owen, M. Hentrl, & J. Bessant (Eds.), A framework for responsible innovation. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansera, M. (2013). Innovation system for sustainability in developing countries. The renewable energy sector in Bolivia. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 27–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages (p. 198). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pitta, D. A., Guesalaga, R., & Marshall, P. (2008). The quest for the fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Potential and challenges. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 393–401.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2010). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits (2nd ed., p. 407). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Mashelkar, R. A. (2010, July–Aug). Innovation’s holy grail. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati, M. (2012). Mitticool. Retrieved from http://www.mitticool.in/

  • Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., Ahuja, S., & Roberts, K. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2012). Supporting grassroots innovation: Facts and figures. Retrieved from http://www.scidev.net/en/science-and-innovation-policy/supporting-grassroots-innovation/features/supporting-grassroots-innovation-facts-and-figures-1.html

  • Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2013). Grassroot innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production 1–11 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sristi. (2012). Honey Bee networks. Retrieved from http://www.sristi.org

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents (Vol. 78). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (2011). Energy, complexity, and sustainability: A historical perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 89–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Terna. (2012). Terna case studies. Retrieved from http://www.terna.it/default/home_en/the_company/sustainability/case_studies/2011/energy_mission.aspx

  • The Hindu. (2006, Aug 10). Bilgaon microhydel project washed away. The Hindu. Mumbai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, B. (2011). Pachakuti: Indigenous perspectives, buen vivir, sumaq kawsay and degrowth. Development, 54(4), 448–454.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2011). Lead Market factors for global innovation: Emerging evidence from India (Hamburg University of technology Working Paper, No.61).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2008). Human development report 2008. New York: United Nation.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (2012). UN habitat case studies. Retrieved from http://www.unhabitat.org/bestpractices/2008/mainview.asp?BPID=2096

  • Van Els, R. H., De Souza Vianna, J. N., & Brasil, A. C. P. (2012). The Brazilian experience of rural electrification in the Amazon with decentralized generation – The need to change the paradigm from electrification to development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(3), 1450–1461.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). In E. V. Hippel (Ed.), Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. P., & Devine Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What does it mean? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497–500.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, A. (1999). Gaviotas: A village to reinvent the world. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). Global issues world bank facts and figures. Retrieved from http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Pansera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pansera, M., Owen, R. (2014). Eco-Innovation at the “Bottom of the Pyramid”. In: Vazquez-Brust, D., Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Collaboration for Sustainability and Innovation: A Role For Sustainability Driven by the Global South?. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7633-3_15

Download citation