Toxicology Evaluation and Properties of a New Biodegradable Computer Made Medical Biomaterial

  • Jinshu Ma
  • Chao Zhang
  • Jingying Sai
  • Guangyu Xu
  • Xiaotian Zhang
  • Chao Feng
  • Fan Li
  • Fang Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 269)


Background Poly (propylene carbonate) (PPC) synthesized from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide has attracted considerable research attention recently. To explore the potential application of these new polymers for bone repair, it is necessary to use other biodegradable polymers to enhance the properties of PPC. Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) was used in this study to modify the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of PPC. Methods Poly (propylene carbonate) (PPC) was melt-mixed with 30 % poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) to enhance its physical properties, while maintaining the inherently high structural integrity and ductility. The mechanical strength, porosity, morphologies and biocompatibility of porous modified-PPC (PM-PPC) were fully investigated using tensile tester, hammering method, scanning electron microscopy, cytotoxicity test for its biocompatibility. Results The PM-PPC was measured by mechanical tests for its compressive strength, elongation module and tensile strength, with the results being 43, 725 and 32 Mpa respectively. The data showed that the mechanical properties of PM-PPC were significantly improved compared with PPC. The mean porosity of PM-PPC was 15 %, as determined by hammering method. The biocompatibility test of PM-PPC showed that it has excellent potential for use as a biomedical material. Conclusions In conclusion, the PM-PPC showed improved mechanical properties, and an acceptable biocompatibility supporting its potential for use in patients. Thus, PM-PPC is a promising candidate for use as a novel medical material.


Porous modified-PPC Composites Mechanical properties 

Abbreviation List


Poly (propylene carbonate)


Modified-poly (propylene carbonate)


Porous modified-poly (propylene carbonate)


Guided tissue regeneration

P (3HB)

Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)


Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)


Poly (3-caprolactone)


Poly (lactic acid)


Polyhydroxybutyrate Valerate


Nuclear magnetic resonance


Propylene Oxide


Gel permeation chromatography


Scanning electron micrograph


Optical density



This work was supported by the China National Science and Technology Support Program (grant number 2007BAE42B06). We thank Professor Rick C Nicholson at Mothers and Babies Research Center, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia for his language assistance and structure design in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    Causa F, Netti PA, Ambrosio L (2007) A multi-functional scaffold for tissue regeneration: the need to engineer a tissue analogue. Biomaterials 28(34):5093–5099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tan X, Li M, Cai P, Luo L, Zou X (2005) An amperometric cholesterol biosensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes and organically modified sol-gel/chitosan hybrid composite film. Anal Biochem 337(1):111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harrison BS, Atala A (2007) Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28(2):344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valappil SP, Misra SK, Boccaccini AR, Keshavarz T, Bucke C, Roy I (2007) Large-scale production and efficient recovery of PHB with desirable material properties, from the newly characterised Bacillus cereus SPV. J Biotechnol 132(3):251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inoue S, Koinuma H, Tsuruta T (1969) Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. J Polym Sci B 7(4):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ge XC, Xu Y, Meng YZ, Li RKY (2005) Thermal and mechanical properties of biodegradable composites of poly(propylene carbonate) and starch-poly(methyl acrylate) graft copolymer. Compos Sci Technol 65(14):2219–2225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Du LC, Meng YZ, Wang SJ, Tjong SC (2004) Synthesis and degradation behavior of poly (propylene carbonate) derived from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J Appl Polym Sci 92(3):1840–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo CH, Wu HS, Zhang XM, Song JY, Zhang X (2009) A comprehensive theoretical study on the coupling reaction mechanism of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide catalyzed by copper (I) cyanomethyl. J Phys Chem A 113(24):6710–6723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu XL, Du FG, Ge XC, Xiao M, Meng YZ (2006) Biodegradability and thermal stability of poly (propylene carbonate)/starch composites. J Biomed Mater Res A 77A(4):653–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ge XC, Zhu Q, Meng YZ (2006) Fabrication and characterization of biodegradable poly (propylene carbonate)/wood flour composites. J Appl Polym Sci 99(3):782–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma XF, Yu JG, Wang N (2006) Compatibility characterization of poly (lactic acid)/poly (propylene carbonate) blends. J Polym Sci B 44(1):94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang XY, Peng SW, Dong LS (2005) Effect of poly (vinyl acetate) (PVAc) on thermal behavior and mechanical properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly (propylene carbonate) (PHB/PPC) blends. Colloid Polym Sci 284(2):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valappil SP, Misra SK, Boccaccini AR, Roy I (2006) Biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates, an overview of animal testing and in vivo responses. Expert Rev Med Devic 3(6):853–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu Q, Wang Y, Chen GQ (2009) Medical application of microbial biopolyesters polyhydroxyalkanoates. Artif Cell Blood Sub 37(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hirotsu T, Ketelaars AAJ, Nakayama K (2000) Biodegradation of poly (epsilon-caprolactone)-polycarbonate blend sheets. Polym Degrad Stabil 68(3):311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ree M, Bae JY, Jung JH, Shin TJ (1999) A new copolymerization process leading to poly (propylene carbonate) with a highly enhanced yield from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J Polym Sci A 37(12):1863–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang ZH, Mo ZS, Zhang HF, Zhang Y, Na TH, An YX, Wang XH, Zhao XJ (2002) Miscibility and hydrogen-bonding interactions in blends of carbon dioxide/epoxy propane copolymer with poly (p-vinylphenol). J Polym Sci B 40(17):1957–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li XH, Meng YZ, Chen GQ, Li RKY (2004) Thermal properties and rheological behavior of biodegradable aliphatic polycarbonate derived from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J Appl Polym Sci 94(2):711–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ishaug-Riley SL, Crane-Kruger GM, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG (1998) Three-dimensional culture of rat calvarial osteoblasts in porous biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials 19(15):1405–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li Y, Shimizu H (2009) Compatibilization by homopolymer: significant improvements in the modulus and tensile strength of PPC/PMMA blends by the addition of a small amount of PVAc. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1(8):1650–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cho SW, Park HJ, Ryu JH, Kim SH, Kim YH, Choi CY, Lee MJ, Kim JS, Jang IS, Kim DI, Kim BS (2005) Vascular patches tissue-engineered with autologous bone marrow-derived cells and decellularized tissue matrices. Biomaterials 26(14):1915–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang K, Wang YB, Hillmyer MA, Francis LF (2004) Processing and properties of porous poly (L-lactide)/bioactive glass composites. Biomaterials 25(13):2489–2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kasten P, Beyen I, Niemeyer P, Luginbuehl R, Bohner M, Richter W (2008) Porosity and pore size of beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomater 4(6):1904–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang S, Zhou K, Huang B, Li Z, Zhu S, Wang G (2008) Preparation of an electrodeposited hydroxyapatite coating on titanium substrate suitable for in vivo applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(1):437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun H, Qu Z, Guo Y, Zang G, Yang B (2007) In vitro and in vivo effects of rat kidney vascular endothelial cells on osteogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells growing on polylactide-glycoli acid (PLGA) scaffolds. Biomed Eng Online 6:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lu XB, Wang Y (2004) Highly active, binary catalyst systems for the alternating copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides under mild conditions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 43(27):3574–3577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meng YZ, Du LC, Tiong SC, Zhu Q, Hay AS (2002) Effects of the structure and morphology of zinc glutarate on the fixation of carbon dioxide into polymer. J Polym Sci A 40(21):3579–3591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qin Y, Wang X (2010) Carbon dioxide-based copolymers: environmental benefits of PPC, an industrially viable catalyst. Biotechnol J 5(11):1164–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen SM, Tan L, Qiu FR, Jiang XL, Wang M, Zhang HD (2004) The study of poly (styrene-co-p-(hexafluoro-2-hydroxylisopropyl)-alpha-methyl-styrene)/poly (propylene carbonate) blends by ESR spin probe and Raman. Polymer 45(9):3045–3053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pego AP, Poot AA, Grijpma DW, Feijen J (2003) Physical properties of high molecular weight 1,3-trimethylene carbonate and D, L-lactide copolymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14(9):767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peng SW, An YX, Chen C, Fei B, Zhuang YG, Dong LS (2004) Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly (propylene carbonate) blends (vol 90, p 4054, 2003). J Appl Polym Sci 91(2):1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li XH, Meng YZ, Wang SJ, Rajulu AV, Tjong SC (2004) Completely biodegradable composites of poly (propylene carbonate) and short, lignocellulose fiber Hildegardia populifolia. J Polym Sci B 42(4):666–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chiellini E, Cinelli P, Imam SH, Mao L (2001) Composite films based on biorelated agro-industrial waste and poly (vinyl alcohol) Preparation and mechanical properties characterization. Biomacromolecules 2(3):1029–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yang DZ, Hu P (2008) Miscibility, crystallization, and mechanical properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly (propylene carbonate) biodegradable blends. J Appl Polym Sci 109(3):1635–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang Y, Gao H, Gou M, Ye H, Liu Y, Gao Y, Peng F, Qian Z, Cen X, Zhao Y (2010) Acute toxicity and genotoxicity studies on poly (epsilon-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly (epsilon-caprolactone) nanomaterials. Mutat Res 696(2):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA (2007) Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 28(21):3188–3197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cenni E, Granchi D, Avnet S, Fotia C, Salerno M, Micieli D, Sarpietro MG, Pignatello R, Castelli F, Baldini N (2008) Biocompatibility of poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles conjugated with alendronate. Biomaterials 29(10):1400–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinshu Ma
    • 1
  • Chao Zhang
    • 1
  • Jingying Sai
    • 1
  • Guangyu Xu
    • 1
  • Xiaotian Zhang
    • 1
  • Chao Feng
    • 1
  • Fan Li
    • 1
  • Fang Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathogenobiologyNorman Bethune College of Medicine, Jilin UniversityChangchunPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations