Advertisement

Traditional Chinese Medicine Literature Metadata: A Draft Technical Specification Developed by the International Organization for Standardization

  • Tong Yu
  • Meng Cui
  • Haiyan Li
  • Shuo Yang
  • Yang Zhao
  • Zhang Zhulu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 269)

Abstract

Currently, there is a lack of international standard for literature metadata in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) domain, which becomes a major obstacle for the indexing and retrieval of TCM literature. In 2013, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) finished the draft technical specification (DTS) “Traditional Chinese medicine literature metadata”, which will play an important role in the preservation and utilization of TCM literature resources. In this paper, we articulate the content and characteristics of this DTS, compare it with other related ISO standards, and explain the creativity and necessity of this DTS.

Keywords

Traditional Chinese medicine Literature Metadata International Organization for Standardization Technical specification Standardization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central public welfare research institutes (NO. ZZ070804, NO. ZZ070311, NO ZZ060808, NO. ZZ070314)”, “the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (NO. 2012M520559)”.

References

  1. 1.
    Weibel S (1997) The Dublin core: a simple content description model for electronic resources. Bul Am Soc Info Sci Tech 24(1):9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alasem A (2009) An overview of e-government metadata standards and initiatives based on Dublin core. Electron J e-Govern 7(1):1–10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carpenter B, Park JR (2009) Encoded archival description (EAD) metadata scheme: an analysis of use of the EAD headers. J Libr Metadata 9(1–2):134–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    IEEE P1484.12.1 (2002) Draft standard for learning object metadata. http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_WD6_4.pdf. Accessed on Aug 2002
  5. 5.
    Vargo J, Nesbit JC, Belfer K, Archambault A (2003) Learning object evaluation: computer-mediated collaboration and inter-rater reliability. Int J Comput Appl 25(3):198–205Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malet G, Munoz F, Appleyard R, Hersh W (1999) Model formulation: a model for enhancing internet medical document retrieval with “medical core metadata”. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6(2):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darmoni S, Thirion B, Platel S, Douyère M, Mourouga P, Leroy JP (2002) CISMeF-patient: a French counterpart to MEDLINEplus. J Med Libr Assoc 90(2):248–253Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sakai Y (2001) Metadata for evidence-based medicine resources. In: Oyama K, Gotoda H (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on Dublin core and metadata applications 2001 (DCMI ‘01). National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, pp 81–85Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NLM metadata: U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/tsd/cataloging/metafilenew.html
  10. 10.
    Li HY, Cui M, Ren GH et al (2011) Progress of the standardization efforts for traditional medicine informatics in ISO/TC215. Int J Tradit Chin 33(3):193–195 (In Chinese)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tong Y, Cui M, Yang S (2013) Investigating traditional Chinese informatics standards under the development of ISO/TC 215. Chin Dig Med 8(2):46–49 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein GO (2011) Metadata-an international standard for clinical knowledge resources. Stud Health Technol Inform 169:839–843Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tong Yu
    • 1
  • Meng Cui
    • 1
  • Haiyan Li
    • 1
  • Shuo Yang
    • 1
  • Yang Zhao
    • 1
  • Zhang Zhulu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Information on Traditional Chinese MedicineChina Academy of Chinese Medicine SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations