Advertisement

Evaluation Model of Medical English Teaching Effect Based on Item Response Theory

  • Lanfen Ji
  • Dianjun Lu
  • Dianxiang Lu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 269)

Abstract

The teaching effect of medical English involves learning competence of students and teaching level of teachers, at medical college its significance has immediate influence on the vocational skills and knowledge absorbing capacity of students. As one of modern psychometric techniques, item response theory provides more insights over and above those gained from classical psychometric techniques. Using item response theory to evaluate medical English teaching effect is a new attempt. This paper presents an introduction to item response theory and demonstrates the evaluation model of the teaching effect of medical English based on item response theory.

Keywords

Item response theory Cumulative IRT models Psychometric techniques Medical english 

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerman TA (1994) Using multidimensional item response theory to understand what items and tests are measuring. Appl Measur Educ 7:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackerman TA, Gierl MJ, Walker CM (2003) Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological tests. Educ Measur Issues Pract 22:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foti RJ, Lord RG (1987) Prototypes and scripts: the effects of alternative methods of processing information on rating accuracy. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 39:318–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tejeda MJ, Scandura TA, Pillai R (2001) The MLQ revisited: psychometric properties and recommendations. Leadersh Quart 12:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Facteau JD, Craig SB (2001) Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? J Appl Psychol 86:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reise SP, Henson JM (2003) A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales. J Pers Assess 81:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drasgow F, Hulin CL (1990) Item response theory. In: Dunnette MD and Hough LM (eds) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed, vol 1. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, pp 577–636Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ (1991) Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coombs CH (1950) Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychol Rev 57:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thurstone LL (1928) Attitudes can be measures. Am J Sociol 33:529–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberts JS (1995) Item response theory approaches to attitude measurement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1995, 56, 7089B, Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charles, Scherbaum, Finlinson S, Barden K, Tamanini K(2006) Applications of item response theory to measurement issues in leadership research. Leadersh Q 17:366–386Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Foreign Language Department of Qinghai Normal UniversityXiningPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics of Qinghai Normal UniversityXiningPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Research center for high altitude medicine in Qinghai UniversityXiningPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations