The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics—How Did it Come About? What Challenges Does it Present for Teachers and for the Teaching of Mathematics?

Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)


The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics which incorporates the content descriptions and proficiencies from Foundation Year to Year 10 came into being in December 2010 when all Australian governments—the national government and the governments of the eight States and Territories—gave their approval to the draft which had been in circulation for nearly two years. Prior to that, each State and Territory had responsibility for developing and implementing its own curriculum. In 2008, an Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA) was also established to coordinate and oversee the development of national curricula in all areas of compulsory schooling, and to move towards an agreed upon national curriculum for Years 11 and 12. The formation of ACARA and the adoption of an Australian Curriculum: Mathematics (2010) are interpreted as a result of major transformations of an Australian federalist model over the past twenty years, shaped in large degree by the demands of national assessment and school reporting. This chapter examines how this came about, what has been achieved within Australia’s ongoing federalist framework, and also points to some future challenges for teachers in implementing the national curriculum in mathematics.


Mathematics National curriculum Australia Policy 


  1. Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (2010). Australian curriculum mathematics. Sydney: ACARA., accessed on 10 January, 2013 [to view one year level per page with elaborations, press the E icon in VIEW on the cover page; Senior Secondary Courses can be accessed through the control bar at the top of the page]. Google Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (2012). Draft senior secondary Australian Curriculum: Mathematics, November 2012. Sydney: ACARA., last accessed 25 September 2013. Google Scholar
  3. Australian Education Council (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne: Australian Education Council. Google Scholar
  4. Australian Government (2004). Schools assistance (learning together—achievement through choice and opportunity) act 2004, paragraphs 14(1)(f) and 14(1)(g) and subsections 31(f) and 31(g)., Accessed on 18 August 2011.
  5. Board of Studies (2012). NSW syllabuses for the Australian curriculum: mathematics K-10. Sydney: Board of Studies. Accessed on 14 January 2013. Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (2001). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school: generalization and proof. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study conference. The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (pp. 155–162). Melbourne: University of Melbourne. Google Scholar
  7. Catholic Education Office Melbourne (2011). Rich assessment tasks in mathematics: years 5 to 8. Melbourne: Author. Google Scholar
  8. Council for the Australian Federation (2007). Federalist paper 2: the future of schooling in Australia (pp. 13–14). Melbourne: Department of Premier and Cabinet. rev. ed. http://dpl/Books/2007/FederalistPaper2_SchoolingInAustraliaRevEd.pdf. Accessed on 31 August, 2011. Google Scholar
  9. Dawkins, J. S. (1988). Strengthening Australia’s schools: a consideration of the focus and content of schooling. Canberra: Minister for Employment, Education and Training. http://dpl/Books/2008/StrengtheningAustSchools.pdf. Accessed on 8 August 2011. Google Scholar
  10. Department of Education (2010). National curriculum for mathematics (England). London: Department of Education. Google Scholar
  11. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD) (2008). Victorian essential learning standards (mathematics). Melbourne: DEECD., last accessed 6 February, 2012. Google Scholar
  12. Donnelly, K. (2005). Benchmarking Australian primary school curricula. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training., last accessed 6 February, 2012. Google Scholar
  13. Gillard, J. (2008). Second reading speech: Australian curriculum, assessment and reporting authority bill 2008. Canberra: Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Services., accessed on 2 September 2011. Google Scholar
  14. Japan Society of Mathematical Education (2000). Mathematics program in Japan: elementary, lower secondary and upper secondary schools. Tokyo: JSME. Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, P. (2008). Labor plan is modest progress on education, Australian, 26 September 2008, p. 16,;query=Id%3A%22
  16. Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, A. (2009). Appreciating mathematical structure for all. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 10–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA) (1989). The Hobart declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century.,11577.html, accessed on 2 February, 2012.
  18. Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA) (1999). The Adelaide declaration on schooling.,11576.html, accessed on 2 February, 2012.
  19. Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA) (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians.,25979.html, accessed on 2 February, 2012.
  20. Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China (2001, 2011). Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China (2011). Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education (2011 version). Beijing: Author. Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Education, Singapore (2007). Primary mathematics syllabus. Singapore: Author. Google Scholar
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: a quest for coherence. Reston: Author. Google Scholar
  24. Parliament of Australia: Parliamentary Library (2008). Bills digest no. 60 2008-09: Australian curriculum, assessment and reporting authority bill., accessed 2 February, 2012.
  25. Stephens, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Teacher capacity as a key element of national curriculum reform in mathematics: an exploratory comparative study between Australia and China. In Mathematics: tradition and [ new] practices, joint AAMT-MERGA conference, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, July 3–7 (pp. 702–710). Google Scholar
  26. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2012). AusVELS: mathematics. Melbourne: VCAA., accessed on 13 January, 2013. Google Scholar
  27. Watson, J., & Nathan, E. (2010). Biased sampling and PCK: the case of the marijuana problem. In Shaping the future of mathematics education, 33rd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, July 3–7 (pp. 610–617). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations