Advertisement

Related Projections

  • Stanley K. Smith
  • Jeff Tayman
  • David A. Swanson
Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 37)

Abstract

Many planning and budgeting decisions are based on projections of households, school enrollment, family structure, employment, poverty, disability status, and similar variables. These projections are related to population projections in that they are strongly affected by population size and demographic composition. In this chapter, we describe two methods for making projections of socioeconomic characteristics, health characteristics, and a variety of population subgroups (e.g., persons in prison or enrolled in government benefits programs). One derives these projections from population projections by age (and sometimes by sex, race, and ethnicity as well) and the other employs cohort-change ratios similar to those described in  Chap. 7. We illustrate the application of these methods using projections of school enrollment, disability, labor force, and households.

Keywords

Labor Force Housing Unit School Enrollment Population Projection Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alba, R., & Islam, T. (2009). The case of disappearing Mexican Americans: An ethnic-identity mystery. Population Research Policy Review, 28, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arterburn, D. E., Crane, P. K., & Sullivan, S. D. (2004). The coming epidemic of obesity in elderly Americans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya, J., Cutler, D. M., Goldman, D. P., Hurd, M. D., Joyce, G. F., Lakdawalla, D. N., Panis, C. W. A., & Shang, B. (2004). Disability forecasts and future Medicare costs. NBER Frontiers in Health Policy Research, 7, 75–94.Google Scholar
  4. George, M. V., Smith, S., Swanson, D. A., & Tayman, J. (2004). Population projections. In J. Siegel & D. A. Swanson (Eds.), The methods and materials of demography (2nd ed., pp. 561–601). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Kaneshiro, M., Martinez, A., & Swanson, D. A. (2011). Disappearing Hispanics? The case of Los Angeles County, California: 1990–2000. In R. Verdugo (Ed.), The demography of the Hispanic population: Selected essays (pp. 95–122). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Lindh, T., & Malmberg, B. (2007). Demographically based global income forecasts up to the year 2050. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martins, J., Yusuf, F., & Swanson, D. A. (2012). Consumer demographics and behaviour: Markets are people. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Modigliani, F. (1970). The life-cycle hypothesis and intercountry differences in the saving ratio. In W. Eltis, M. Scott, & J. Wolfe (Eds.), Induction, growth, and trade: Essays in honour of Sir Roy Harrod (pp. 197–225). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies. (2005). Household forecasts. Paris, from http://www.insee.fr/en/methodes/default.asp?page=sources/ope-projections-de-menages.htm
  10. O’Rand, A., & Krecker, M. (1990). Concepts of the life cycle: Their history, meanings, and uses in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Population Research Center. (2009). Population forecasts for Lane County, its Cities and unincorporated area 2008–2035, from http://www.lanecounty.org/departments/pw/lmd/landuse/documents/forecasts_report_final.pdf
  12. Siegel, J. S. (2002). Applied demography. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Singer, B. H., & Manton, K. G. (1998). The effects of health changes on projections of health service needs for the elderly population of the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 15618–15622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, S. K., Rayer, S., & Smith, E. A. (2008). Aging and disability: Implications for the housing industry and housing policy in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Southern California Association of Governments. (2013). Forecast methodology: City demographic trend projection, from http://www.scag.ca.gov/forecast/methods.htm
  16. Stark, R. (2007). Sociology (Tenth ed.). Independence: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  17. Swanson, D. A., & Tayman, J. (2012). Subnational population estimates. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sweeney, S. H., & Middleton, E. J. (2005). Multiregional cohort enrolment projections: Matching methods to enrolment policies. Population, Space and Place, 11, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Toossi, M. (2012). Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 43–64.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012a). Current Population Survey (CPS) – Definitions. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, from http://www.census.gov/cps/about/cpsdef.html
  21. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012b). Projections of the population by selected age groups and sex for the United States: 2015 2060. NP2012-T2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, from http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012/summarytables.html
  22. Zeng, Y., Land, K. C., Wang, Z., & Gu, D. (2006). U.S. family household momentum and dynamics: An extension and application of the ProFamy method. Population Research and Policy Review, 25, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanley K. Smith
    • 1
  • Jeff Tayman
    • 2
  • David A. Swanson
    • 3
  1. 1.Bureau of Economic and Business ResearchUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Economics DepartmentUniversity of California-San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations