The EU, the US and Right to be Forgotten

  • Paul Bernal


The so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ has been a subject of much debate on both sides of the Atlantic since Commissioner Viviane Reding announced her intention to introduce it in 2010. What is seen by those proposing it on the European side to be a simple and logical extension of existing data protection principles is presented in the US as ‘the biggest threat to free speech on the internet in the current decade’. Both sides see themselves as protecting the rights of the ordinary people—the EU in the face of the potentially overwhelming power of the corporate internet behemoths, the US in the face of the excessive and controlling zeal of the European regulators.


Personal Data European Regulator Data Protection Social Networking Site Free Speech 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bell, C. G., and J. Gemmell. 2009. Total recall: How the E-memory revolution will change everything. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  2. Bernal, Paul. 2011. A right to delete? European Journal of Law and Technology Vol. 2, No. 2.
  3. Bambauer, Jane. (forthcoming 2014). Is Data Speech? 66 Stan. L. Rev.Google Scholar
  4. Brin, David. 1998. The transparent society: Will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom? Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Haynes Stuart, Allyson. 2013. Search results—Buried if not forgotten, paper presented at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference, Berkeley, June 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Hoven, Michael. 2012. Balancing privacy and speech in the right to be forgotten, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 2012.
  7. Rosen, Jeffrey. 2012. The right to be forgotten, Stanford Law Review Online.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UEA Law SchoolUniversity of East AngliaCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations