Advertisement

Decoding Afrocentrism: Decolonizing Legal Theory

  • Dan Kuwali
  • Dan Kuwali
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 29)

Abstract

When the Europeans colonized African countries, they transplanted Eurocentric legal traditions on the African soil but never considered the impact of the imperial laws’ on, or interaction with, native laws and customs. The knowledge gap in assessment of the cross-fertilization of the legal traditions has left the hegemonic Western legal theory obscuring the indigenous African philosophical traditions; coupled with spurious perceptions of Africa as a ‘dark continent’ of uncivilized people. Surely, to debunk the existence or validity of African juridical thought is to throw the baby with the bath water. Although the legal systems of the native Africans were not formal, the communities were still governed by systematic laws and customs which were not written but integrated in culture and anchored in tradition. Afrocentric legal traditions can, therefore, be decoded through philosophical reflection of social practices and customs of indigenous societies. A sense of difference – in that it is not written but integrated in culture and transmitted through proverbs – is part of the unique ethos of African jurisprudence. Clearly, emblematic of the theories that have emerged from the indigenous African legal thought are, inter alia, concepts such as restorative justice, reconciliation, alternative dispute resolution, ‘ubuntu’ (humanity) which is centred on respect for human rights and human dignity as well as humanity as embodied in the ‘Martens Clause’, consensus decision-making process (panel of the wise), universal jurisdiction and the responsibility to protect (brother’s keeper) literally. The nature of its laws is usually reflective of the fundamental values of that society itself. Yet African juristic thought has been imprisoned in Eurocentric jurisprudence. By unlocking the ‘African-ness’ in mainstream legal theory, African legal theory can be a useful tool in the search for solutions to problems faced by African communities such as among others the peace or justice dilemma in Darfur, in international justice and the selectiveness of the United Nations (UN) Security Council in international law and international relations. For example, the ‘ubuntu’ philosophy was sufficient to deal with the post-apartheid accountability in South Africa. Therefore, let no man put asunder relevant African solutions to uniquely African problems, from ‘land grabs’ to mitigation and adaptation to climate change.

Keywords

Security Council Armed Conflict Restorative Justice Legal Theory Alternative Dispute Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acton HB (1952/1953) Tradition and some other forms of order. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Order New Series 53, pp. 1–28Google Scholar
  2. Adewoye O (1987) Proverbs as vehicle of juristic thought among the Yoruba. Obafemi Awolowo Univ Law J 3(4), pp. 179–195Google Scholar
  3. Allen RE (ed) (1989) The South African pocket Oxford dictionary. Oxford University Press, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayinla LA (2002) African philosophy of law: a critique. J Int Comp Law 6:147–168Google Scholar
  5. Bagley EF (2009) United States Department of State special representative for global partnerships, Global Partnership Initiative, Office of the Secretary of State, 18 JuneGoogle Scholar
  6. Bah AMS (2005) The intervention dilemma. In: Aboagye FB, Bah AMS (eds) A tortuous road to peace: the dynamics of regional, UN and international humanitarian intervention in Liberia. Institute for Security Studies, Pretoria, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  7. Bayles MD (1992) Hart’s legal philosophy. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chimni BS (2006) Third world approaches to international law: a manifesto. Int Commun Law Rev 8:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dike KO, Ajayi JF (1968) African historiography. In: Sills DI (ed) International encyclopedia of social sciences, vol 6. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Driberg JH (1934) The African conception of law. J Comp Legis Int Law 16(4):230–245, http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/07/30/120/30fa_fact_leghrer Google Scholar
  11. Durant W (1954) Our oriental heritage. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Elegido JM (2001) Jurisprudence. Ibadan: Spectrum Law PublishingGoogle Scholar
  13. Elias TO (1956) The nature of African customary law. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  14. Elias TO (1993) Legal theory: a Nigerian perspective. In: Jegede MIJ (ed) Nigerian essays in jurisprudence. MIJ Publishers, LagosGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleischacker S (1994) The ethics of culture. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedmann WG (1969) Chambers’s encyclopaedia new revised edition, vol 8. International Learning Systems Corporation Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Gade CBN (2011) The historical development of the written discourses on Ubuntu. S Afr J Philos 30(3):303–329Google Scholar
  18. Geldenhuys D (2006) Brothers as keepers: Africa’s new sovereignty regime. Strateg Rev South Afr 28(2)Google Scholar
  19. Gluckman M (1963) Order and rebellion in tribal Africa, Chap. 7. Cohen and West, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Gluckman M (1967) Judicial process among the Barotse. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  21. Grotius H (1925) De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Book II, Ch. 25, sec. 8, Vol. IIGoogle Scholar
  22. Gyekye K (1997) Tradition and modernity: philosophical reflections on the African experience. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hans Fabricius (2012) Zimbabwe Torture case (SALC and another v. National Director of Public Prosecutions and others)Google Scholar
  24. Hart HLA (1961) The concept of law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Holleman JF (1974) Issues in African law. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  26. International Court of Justice, Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports 1996 (I). (See dissenting opinion of Judge Koroma, p 14)Google Scholar
  27. International Military Tribunal, The trial of German major war criminals. Proceedings of the international military tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany, Judgment of 1 Oct 1946Google Scholar
  28. Kuwali D (2011) The responsibility to protect: implementation of article 4(h) intervention. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehrer J (2012) Groupthink: the myth of brainstorming myth. The New Yorker available at: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/01/30/20130fa_fact_lehrer. Accessed on 28 sept 2013
  30. Lindy A (2010) The early morning phone call: Somali refugees remittances: studies in forced migration, vol 28. Berghahn Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Lloyd of Hampstead, Freeman MDA (1985) Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. Stevens, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Luck EC (2008) Statement at Arria formula meeting on the responsibility to protect. Working Group on Conflict Prevention and Resolution in Africa United Nations Security CouncilGoogle Scholar
  33. Maluwa T (2000) International law making in the organisation of African unity: an overview. RADIC 12:201–225Google Scholar
  34. Mbeki T (2003) Guardian. Lecture of the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs, LagosGoogle Scholar
  35. Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2012) Available at: http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/consensus. Accessed 7 Apr 2012
  36. Muntharika AP (1995) The role of international law in the twenty-first century: an African perspective. Fordham Int Law J 18:1706–1713Google Scholar
  37. Murungi J (2004) The question of African jurisprudence: some hermeneutic reflections. In: Wiredu K (ed) A companion to African philosophy. Blackwell, Malden, pp 519–526Google Scholar
  38. Mutua M (2000) What is TWAIL?. ASIL Proceedings, April 5–8. Am Soc Int Law. 31–40Google Scholar
  39. Nwakeze PC (1987) A critique of Olufemi Taiwo’s criticism of legal positivism and African legal tradition. Int Philos Q 27(1):101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Obilade AO (1995) A critique of current trends in legal philosophy. Lagos: University of Lagos PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Ocen J (2007) Can traditional rituals bring justice to Northern Uganda? Institute for war and peace reporting. Available at. http://iwpr.net/report-news/can-traditional-rituals-bring-justice-northern-uganda. Accessed 7 May 2012
  42. Okafor FU (1984) Legal positivism and the African legal tradition. Int Philos Q 24(2):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Okafor OC (2008) Critical Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL): theory, methodology, or both? Int Commun Law Rev 10:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oladosu J (2001) Choosing a legal theory on cultural grounds: an African case for legal positivism. West Africa Rev 2(2). http://ivr2003.net/Abstracts/documents/OLADOSU-notinAssociations.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2013
  45. Rajagopal B (1998–1999) Locating the third world in cultural geography. Third World Legal Stud pp. 1–20Google Scholar
  46. Rajagopal B (2006) Counter-hegemonic international law: rethinking human rights and development as a third world strategy. Third World Q 27(5):767–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Republic of South Africa (1996) White paper on welfare. Government Gazette of South Africa, No. 16943 of 2 Feb 1996, Pretoria. http://www.greengazette.co.za/dates/20051230. Accessed 9 Nov 2013
  48. Roberts R, Mann K (1991) Law in colonial Africa. In: Roberts R, Mann K (eds) Law in colonial Africa. Heinemann Educational Books, Portsmouth, pp 3–58Google Scholar
  49. Schachter O (1991) International law in theory and practice. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  50. Sheldo D (2008) Soft law. In: Armstrong D (ed) Routledge handbook of international law. Routledge, London, pp 66–80Google Scholar
  51. Shils E (1981) Tradition. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  52. Slater D (1994) Contesting occidental visions of the global: the geopolitics of theory and north–south relations, 4 Beyond Law, Mas Alla Del DerechoGoogle Scholar
  53. Southern African litigation centre and another v. national director of public prosecutions and others (77150/09) [2012] ZAGPPHC 61; 2012 (10) BCLR 1089 (GNP); [2012] 3 All SA 198 (GNP) (8 May 2012) (See decision of Judge Hans Fabricius, p 54)Google Scholar
  54. Taiwo O (1998) Exorcising Hegel’s ghost: Africa’s challenge to philosophy, on the theme: religion and philosophy in Africa. Afr Stud Q 1(4)Google Scholar
  55. Ticehurst R (1997) The Martens clause and the laws of armed conflict international review of the red cross. 317:125–134. Also available at http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jnhy.htm. Accessed 11 May 2012
  56. Tobi N (1996) Sources of Nigerian law. MIJ Professional Publishers, LagosGoogle Scholar
  57. United Nations (1994) Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its forty-sixth session, 2 May−22 July, GAOR A/49/10Google Scholar
  58. White ND (2007) Regional organizations and humanitarian intervention. Utrecht J Int Eur Law 24(65):24–33Google Scholar
  59. Williams I (2006) Against the Skeptical argument and the Absence thesis: African jurisprudence and the challenge of positivist historiography 6. Available at www.miami.edu/ethics/jpsl. Accessed 7 May 2012
  60. Williams I, Moses O (2008) Theories of law and morality: perspectives from contemporary african jurisprudence. In-Spire J f Law Polit Soc 3(2):151–170Google Scholar
  61. Wilson RA, Nesiah V, Zyl P (2002) Challenging restorative justice. Human Rights Dialogue 2(7). http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/archive/dialogue/2_07/articles/246.html. Accessed 29 Sept 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of LawUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Security StudiesMzuzu UniversityMzuzuMalawi

Personalised recommendations