Abstract
Even simple texts can require active interpretation. Gaps in logical sequences will force the reader to make presumptions about the meanings of the text or the intentions of its author. These gaps are called semantic discontinuities. In scientific writing, semantic discontinuities occur so frequently that they might be regarded as standard practice. The ability to make the required assumptions, through the narrative of a scientific text, could be thought of as a necessary skill; one that must be learned by students as they become proficient in their discipline. Of course, examination questions demand answers and these answers are scientific texts in their own right. Very often, the nature of the question will force the candidate to include semantic discontinuities within their answers. Such demands often lie beyond the capability of the candidate. In these cases, a candidate who understands the science behind a question may fail because they are unable to formulate an acceptable answer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. W. (1942). Gem testing. London: Butterworths.
Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations; regrammaticising experience. As Technical Knowledge. In Martin,J. R. & Veel, R. (Eds.), Reading science; critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
Hill, G. (1986). Chemistry counts. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning; The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. Continuum: London.
Sellgren, K. (2010). New science GCSE.s ‘not tough enough’ says watchdog. In BBC News, Education and family. 16th June.
Sweiry, E., Crisp, V., Ahmed, A., & Pollitt, A. (2002). Tales of the expected: The influence of students’ expectations on exam validity. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Day, A. (2014). Active Readers. In: The Structure of Scientific Examination Questions. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7488-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7488-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7487-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7488-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)