Advertisement

Biomass Production in Intensively Managed Forests

  • Ben du Toit
Chapter
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 26)

Abstract

Intensively managed plantations of fast-growing trees, planted on a short rotations at high stand densities, is arguably one of the most productive and energy efficient ways to produce biomass. In this chapter we discuss silvicultural options to establish and manage highly productive bio-energy plantations, based on case studies from short-rotation plantation forests in warm-climate regions. Our focus is on the growing of biomass as a main product. We also explore the energy and green house gas balances from such intensively managed systems.

Keywords

Stand Density Site Index Short Rotation Rotation Length Silvicultural Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackerman PA, Pulkki RE (2004) “Shorthaul” pulpwood transport in South Africa. A network analysis case study. South Afr For J 201:43–51Google Scholar
  2. Barros NF, Novais RF, Neves JCL, Leal PGL (1992) Fertilizing eucalypt plantations on the Brazilian savannah soils. South Afr For J 160:7–12Google Scholar
  3. Barros NF, Neves JCL, Novais RF (2004) Mineral fertilizer recommendations for eucalypt plantations. In: Gonçalves JLM, Benedetti V (eds) Forest nutrition and fertilization. Institute of Forest Research and Study (IPEF), Piracicaba, pp 269–284Google Scholar
  4. Beard JS (1952) The use of fertiliser in wattle culture. J S Afr For Assoc 22:7–33Google Scholar
  5. Bennett LT, Weston CJ, Attiwill PM (1997) Biomass, nutrient content and growth response to fertilisers of six-year-old Eucalyptus globulus plantations at three contrasting sites in Gippsland, Victoria. Aust J Bot 45:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boreham GR, Pallett RN (2007) The influence of tree improvement and cultural practices associated with mid-rotation Eucalyptus productivity in the temperate region of South Africa. In: Eucalypts and diversity: balancing productivity and sustainability. Proceedings of the IUFRO working group 20803 conference, Durban, 22–26 Oct 2007 (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  7. Carlson CA (2000) Impact of fertilization at first thinning on Pinus patula basal area increment in Mpumalanga. South Afr For J 189:35–45Google Scholar
  8. Carlson CA, Allan R, Morris AR (2004) Effects of temperature on Pinus patula seedlings growing in pots in a controlled environment. South Afr For J 200:27–38Google Scholar
  9. Carlson CA, Fox TR, Colbert SR, Kelting DL, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ (2006) Growth and survival of Pinus taeda in response to surface and subsurface tillage in the Southeastern United States. For Ecol Manage 234(1–3):209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen ZJ (2010) Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigour. Trends Plant Sci 15(2):57–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coetzee J (1999) Growth prediction for short rotation E. grandis crops, ICFR bulletin 9/99. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
  12. Coetzee J, Naicker S (1998) The final results for age two to eleven years in the case of Kia-ora spacing trial, ICFR bulletin 3/98. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Coetzee J, Chiswell K, Storey P, Arbuthnot AL (1996) The final results of the E. grandis spacing trial, Kwambonambi, for age two to ten years, ICFR bulletin 10/96. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
  14. Crous JW, Morris AR, Scholes MC (2007) The significance of residual phosphorus and potassium fertiliser in countering yield decline in a fourth rotation of Pinus patula in Swaziland. South Hemisphere For J 69(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crous JW, Morris AR, Scholes MC (2008) Growth and foliar nutrient response to recent applications of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) and to residual P and K fertiliser applied to the previous rotation of Pinus patula at Usutu, Swaziland. For Ecol Manage 256(4):712–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deleporte P, Laclau JP, Nzila JD, Kazotti JG, Marien JN, Bouillet JP, Szwarc M, D’Annunzio R, Ranger J (2008) Effects of slash and litter management practices on soil chemical properties and growth in second rotation eucalypts in the Congo In: Nambiar EKS (ed) Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests: proceedings of workshops in Piracicaba (Brazil), 22–26 Nov 2004 and Bogor (Indonesia) 6–9 Nov 2006, CIFOR, Bogor, pp 5–22Google Scholar
  17. Donald DGM (1987) The application of fertilizer to pines following second thinning. S Afr For J 142:13–16Google Scholar
  18. Dovey SB (2005) Above-ground allomerty, biomass and nutrient content of Acacia mearnsii across four ages and three sites in the KwaZulu-Natal. Midlands M.Sc. thesis, University of Kwa-ZuluNatal, Pietermaritzburg, 106ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Dovey SB (2009) Estimating biomass and macronutrient content of some commercially important plantation species in South Africa. South For 71(3):245–251Google Scholar
  20. Dovey SB (2012) Effects of clear felling and residue management on nutrient pools, productivity and sustainability in a clonal eucalypt stand in South Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stellenbosch, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  21. Durán A, Gryzenhout M, Slippers B, Ahumada R, Rotella A, Flores F, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2008) Phytophthora pinifolia sp. nov associated with a serious needle disease of Pinus radiata in Chile. Plant Pathol 57(4):715–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. du Toit B (2002) Wattle nutrition. In: Dunlop RW, MacLennan L (eds) Black wattle: the South African research experience. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Pietermaritzburg, pp 47–64Google Scholar
  23. du Toit B (2008) Effects of site management on growth, biomass partitioning and light use efficiency in a young stand of Eucalyptus grandis in South Africa. For Ecol Manage 255(7):2324–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. du Toit B (2012) Chapter 23: Matching site, species and silvicultural regime to optimise the productivity of commercial softwood species in southern Africa. In: Bredenkamp BV, Upfold S (eds) South African forestry handbook, 5th edn. Southern African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, pp 53–59Google Scholar
  25. du Toit B, Dovey SB (2005) Effect of site management on leaf area, biomass development and stand growth efficiency of a young stand of Eucalyptus grandis in South Africa. Can J For Res 35(4):891–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. du Toit B, Arbuthnot A, Oscroft D, Job RA (2001) The effects of remedial fertilizer treatments on growth and pulp properties of Eucalyptus grandis stands established on infertile soils of the Zululand Coastal Plain. South Afr For J 192:9–18Google Scholar
  27. du Toit B, Dovey SB, Smith CW (2008) Effects of slash and site management treatments on soil properties, nutrition and growth of a Eucalyptus grandis plantation in South Africa. In: Nambiar EKS (ed) Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests: proceedings of workshops in Piracicaba (Brazil), 22–26 Nov 2004 and Bogor (Indonesia), 2–9 Nov 2006, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, pp 63–78Google Scholar
  28. du Toit B, Smith CW, Little KM, Boreham G, Pallett RN (2010) Intensive, site-specific silviculture: manipulating resource availability at establishment for improved stand productivity. For Ecol Manage 259:1836–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dvorak WS, Hodge GR, Payn KG (2008) The conservation and breeding of Eucalyptus urophylla: a case study to better protect important populations and improve productivity. South For 70(2):77–85Google Scholar
  30. Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood C, Van Wyk G (1994) Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 288ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Fox TR, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ, Rubilar R, Carlson CA (2007a) Tree nutrition and forest fertilization of pine plantations in the Southern United States. South J Appl For 31(1):5–11Google Scholar
  32. Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007b) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the Southern United States. J For 105(7):337–347Google Scholar
  33. Gardner RAW, Swain TL (1996) Snow damage to timber plantations in KwaZulu-Natal during July 1996 and subsequent species recommendations, ICFR bulletin 8/96. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 12pGoogle Scholar
  34. Gava JL (1997) Efeito da adubação potassica em plantios de E. grandis conduzidos em segunda rotação em solos comdiferentes teores de potasssio trocavel. Serie Tecnica, Piracicaba, IPEF 11, pp 89–94Google Scholar
  35. Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Binkley D (2003) Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Glob Change Biol 9:1438–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gonçalves JLM, Stape JL, Benedetti V, Fessel VAG, Gava JL (2004) An evaluation of minimum and intensive soil preparation regarding fertility and tree nutrition. In: Gonçalves JLM, Benedetti V (eds) Forest nutrition and fertilization. Institute of Forest Research and Study (IPEF), Piracicaba, pp 13–64Google Scholar
  37. Gonçalves JLM, Wichert MCP, Gava JL, Masetto AV, Arthur JC Jr, Serrano MIP, Mello SLM (2007) Soil fertility and growth of Eucalyptus grandis in Brazil under different residue management practices. South Hemisphere For J 69(2):95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gonçalves JLM, Stape JL, Laclau J, Bouillet J, Ranger J (2008) Assessing the effects of early silvicultural management on long-term site productivity of fast-growing eucalypt plantations: the Brazilian experience. South For 70(2):105–118Google Scholar
  39. Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2003) Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenergy 25:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herbert MA (1996) Fertilisers and eucalypt plantations in South Africa. In: Attiwill PM, Adams MA (eds) Nutrition of eucalypts. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 303–325Google Scholar
  41. Herbert MA (2012) Chapter 24: Site requirements of commercial Eucalyptus and Corymbia species in Southern Africa. In: Bredenkamp BV, Upfold S (eds) South African forestry handbook, 5th edn. Southern African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, pp 51–58Google Scholar
  42. Herbert MA, Schönau APG (1989) Fertilizing commercial forest species in Southern Africa: research progress and problems (part I). S Afr For J 151:58–70Google Scholar
  43. Hodge GR, Dvorak WS (2007) Variation in pitch canker resistance among provenances of Pinus patula and Pinus tecunumanii from Mexico and Central America. New For 33(2):193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hurley BP, Slippers J, Wingfield MJ, Dyer C, Slippers B (2012) Perception and knowledge of the Sirex woodwasp and other forest pests in South Africa. Agric For Entomol 14(3):306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanzler A, Hagedorn SF, Hodge GR, Dvorak WS (2003) Genotype by environment interaction for volume growth at 6 years of age in a series of five Pinus patula progeny trials in Southern Africa. South Afr For J 198:3–15Google Scholar
  46. Kotze H, du Toit B (2012) Chapter 211: Silviculture of industrial pine plantations in Southern Africa. In: Bredenkamp BV, Upfold S (eds) South African forestry handbook, 5th edn. Southern African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, pp 133–149Google Scholar
  47. Kyle KH, Andrews LJ, Fox TR, Aust WM, Burger JA, Hansen GH (2005) Long-term effects of drainage, bedding, and fertilization on growth of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the coastal plain of Virginia. South J Appl For 29(4):205–214Google Scholar
  48. Lacey ST, Brennan PD, Parekh J (2001) Deep may not be meaningful: cost and effectiveness of various ripping tine configurations in a plantation cultivation trial in eastern Australia. New For 21(3):231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Laclau J-P, Deleporte P, Range J, Bouillet J-P, Kazotti G (2003) Nutrient dynamics throughout the rotation of Eucalyptus clonal stands in Congo. Ann Bot 91:879–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. For Ecol Manage 95:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lincoln MC, Will RE, Morris LA, Carter EA, Markewitz D, Britt JR, Cazell B, Ford V (2007) Soil change and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seedling growth following site preparation tillage in the upper coastal plain of the Southeastern United States. For Ecol Manage 242(2–3):558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Linder S (1985) Potential and actual production in Australian forest stands. In: Landsberg JJ, Parsons W (eds) Research for forest management. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 11–35Google Scholar
  53. Little KM, Rolando CA (2008) Regional vegetation management standards for commercial Eucalyptus plantations in South Africa. South For 70(2):87–97Google Scholar
  54. Little KM, van Staden J (2003) Interspecific competition affects early growth of a Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis hybrid clone in Zululand, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 69(4):505–513Google Scholar
  55. Little KM, Smith CW, Norris CH (2001) The influence of various methods of plantation residue management on replanted Acacia mearnsii growth. Aust For 63(3):226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Little KM, van Staden J, Clarke JPY (2003) Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis variability and intra-genotypic competition as a function of different vegetation management treatments. New For 25:227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Little KM, Rolando CA, Morris CD (2007) An integrated analysis of 33 Eucalyptus trials linking the onset of competition-induced tree growth suppression with management, physiographic and climatic factors. Ann For Sci 64:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lopez GA, Potts BM, Tilyard PA (2000) F1 hybrid inviability in Eucalyptus: the case of E. ovata × E. globulus. Heredity 85(3):242–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Louw JH, Scholes M (2002) Forest site classification and evaluation: a South African perspective. For Ecol Manage 171(1–2):153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Louw, Smith (2012) Chapter 22: Forest site classification. In: Bredenkamp BV, Upfold S (eds) South African forestry handbook, 5th edn. Southern African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, pp 27–41Google Scholar
  61. Louw JH, Germishuizen I, Smith CW (2011) A stratification of the South African forestry landscape based on climatic parameters. South For 73(1):51–62Google Scholar
  62. Malan FS, Verryn SD (1996) Effect of genotype-by-environment interaction on the wood properties and qualities of four-year-old Eucalyptus grandis and E grandis hybrids. S Afr For J 176:47–53Google Scholar
  63. Maree B, Kotze H, du Toit B (2012) Chapter 212: Silviculture of industrial Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in South Africa. In: Bredenkamp BV, Upfold S (eds) South African forestry handbook, 5th edn. Southern African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, pp 151–165Google Scholar
  64. Matthews RW (2001) Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems. Biomass Bioenergy 21:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mead DJ, Pimentel D (2006) Use of energy analyses in silvicultural decision-making. Biomass Bioenergy 30:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mendham DS, Grove TS, O’Connell AM, Rance SJ (2008) Impacts of inter-rotation site management on soil nutrients and plantation productivity in Eucalyptus globulus plantations in South-western Australia. In Nambiar EKS (ed) Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests: proceedings of workshops in Piracicaba (Brazil), 22–26 Nov 2004 and Bogor (Indonesia), 6–9 Nov 2006, CIFOR, Bogor, pp 79–92Google Scholar
  67. Mitchell RG, Wingfield MJ, Hodge GR, Dvorak WS, Coutinho TA (2013) Susceptibility of provenances and families of Pinus maximinoi and Pinus tecunumanii to frost in South Africa. New For 44:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nambiar EKS (ed) (2008) Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, 236ppGoogle Scholar
  69. Nambiar EKS, Sands R (1990) Effects of compaction and simulated root channels in the subsoil on root development, water uptake and growth of radiata pine. Tree Physiol 10:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Noble AD, Herbert MA (1991) Influence of soil organic matter content on the responsiveness of Eucalyptus grandis to nitrogen fertiliser. S Afr For J 156:23–27Google Scholar
  71. Owens SJ, Miller R (2009) Cross- and self-fertilization of plants – Darwin’s experiments and what we know now. Bot J Linn Soc 161(4):357–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pallett RN (2005) Precision forestry for pulpwood re-establishment silviculture. South Afr For J 203:33–40Google Scholar
  73. Pallett RN, Sale G (2002) Operational gain: measuring the capture of genetic gain. South Afr For J 195:33–38Google Scholar
  74. Payn TW, de Ronde C, Grey DC (1988) Phosphate fertilization of mature Pinus radiata stands. S Afr For J 147:26–31Google Scholar
  75. Rubilar R, Blevins L, Toro J, Vita A, Muñoz F (2008) Early response of Pinus radiata plantations to weed control and fertilization on metamorphic soils of the Coastal Range, Maule Region, Chile. Bosque 29(1):74–84Google Scholar
  76. Schlamadinger B, Apps M, Bohlin F, Gustavsson L, Jungmeier G, Marland G, Pingoud K, Savolaine I (1997) Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems. Biomass Bioenergy 13(6):359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schönau APG (1983) Fertilisation in South African forestry. S Afr For J 125:1–19Google Scholar
  78. Schönau APG (1984) Silvicultural considerations for high productivity of Eucalyptus grandis. For Ecol Manage 9:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith CW, du Toit B (2005) The effect of harvesting operations, slash management and fertilisation on the growth of a Eucalyptus clonal hybrid on a sandy soil. South Afr For J 203:15–26Google Scholar
  80. Smith CW, Norris CH, Esprey LJ (2000) The effect of land preparation at establishment on the productivity of fast growing hardwoods in the summer rainfall regions of South Africa, ICFR bulletin series 06/2000. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith CW, Little KM, Norris CH (2001) The effect of land preparation at re-establishment on the productivity of fast growing hard woods in South Africa. Aust For 64:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith CW, Pallett RN, Kunz R, Gardner RAW, du Plessis M (2005) A strategic forestry site classification for the summer rainfall region of Southern Africa based on climate, geology and soils, Institute for commercial forestry research bulletin series 03/2005. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
  83. Snowdon P (2002) Modeling Type 1 and Type 2 growth responses in plantations after application of fertiliser or other silvicultural treatments. For Ecol Manage 163:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Snowdon P, Waring HD (1984) Long-term nature of growth responses obtained to fertiliser and weed control applied at planting and their consequences of forest management. In: Grey DC, Schonau APG, Schutz CJ, van Laar A (eds) IUFRO symposium on site and site productivity of fast growing plantations, vol 2. South African Forest Research Institute (SAFRI) and Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria, pp 701–711Google Scholar
  85. Sochacki SJ, Harper RJ, Smettem KRJ (2007) Estimation of woody biomass production from a short-rotation bio-energy system in semi-arid Australia. Biomass Bioenergy 31:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stape JL (2002) Production ecology of clonal Eucalyptus plantations in northeastern Brazil. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft CollinsGoogle Scholar
  87. Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG (2008) Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations. For Ecol Manage 255(3-4):920–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG, Fonseca S, Loos RA, Takahashi EN, Azevedo MR (2010) The Brazil eucalyptus potential productivity project: influence of water, nutrients and stand uniformity on wood production. For Ecol Manage 259(9):1684–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Swart WJ, Wingfield MJ, Knox-Davies PS (1988) Relative susceptibility to Sphaeropsis sapinea of six Pinus spp. cultivated in South Africa. Eur J For Pathol 18(3–4):184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tribe GD, Cillié JJ (2004) The spread of Sirex noctilio fabricius (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in South African pine plantations and the introduction and establishment of its biological control agents. Afr Entomol 12(1):9–17Google Scholar
  91. Turnbull CRA, Beadle CL, Bird T, McLeod DE (1988) Volume production in intensively managed eucalypt plantations. Appita J 41:447–450Google Scholar
  92. Turner J, Knott JH, Lambert M (1996) Fertilization of Pinus radiata after thinning I Productivity gains. Aust For 59(1):7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Verryn SD (2002) Harvesting genetics for productive plantations. South Afr For J 195:83–87Google Scholar
  94. Verryn SD (2008) Breeding for wood quality – a perspective for the future. N Z J For Sci 38(1):5–13Google Scholar
  95. Viero PWM, Little KM (2006) A comparison of different planting methods including hydrogels, and their effect on eucalypt survival and initial growth in South Africa. South Hemisphere For J 208:5–13Google Scholar
  96. Wagner RG, Little KM, Richardson B, McNabb K (2006) The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world’s forests. Forestry 79:57–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. White DA, Crombie DS, Kinal J, Battaglia M, McGrath JF, Mendham DS, Walker SN (2009) Managing productivity and drought risk in eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-western Australia. For Ecol Manage 259(1):33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Williams CO (1928) Manuring of wattles. Farming S Africa 3:1013–1019Google Scholar
  99. Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Hurley BP, Coutinho TA, Wingfield BD, Roux J (2008) Eucalypt pests and diseases: growing threats to plantation productivity. South For 70(2):139–144Google Scholar
  100. Wu HX, Eldridge KG, Colin Matheson A, Powell MB, McRae TA, Butcher TB, Johnson IG (2007) Achievements in forest tree improvement in Australia and New Zealand 8. Successful introduction and breeding of radiata pine in Australia. Aust For 70(4):215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Xu ZH, Simpson JA, Osborne DO (1995a) Mineral nutrition of slash pine in subtropical Australia. I. Stand growth response to fertilization. Fertil Res 41(2):93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Xu ZH, Simpson JA, Osborne DO (1995b) Mineral nutrition of slash pine in subtropical Australia. III. Relationships between foliar P concentration and stand growth. Fertil Res 41(2):109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zobel B, Talbert J (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  104. Zwolinski J, Johnston M, Kotze H (2002) Soil treatments for improved timber production in Pinus radiata plantations in South Africa. For Ecol Manage 171(1–2):199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest and Wood ScienceStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations