Risk Management, Banality of Evil and Moral Blindness in Organizations and Corporations

  • Jacob Dahl Rendtorff
Part of the Ethical Economy book series (SEEP, volume 43)


This paper applies Hannah Arendt’s philosophy of the banality of evil and moral blindness to risk management, business ethics and organization ethics. The paper investigates figures of banality of evil in organizations and corporations on the basis of Hannah Arendt’s analysis of the Eichmann as the stereotype of the obedient administrator that is unable to understand the moral risk implications of his actions. Thus the paper contains the following major parts: (1) The concept of moral blindness as proposed in Arendt’s philosophy of responsibility and judgment (2) Interpretations of moral blindness, power and domination following from the concept of systemic action in Arendt’s philosophy: Zygmunt Bauman (Modernity and the Holocaust), Stanley Milgram (obedience under authority), Philip Zimbardo (The Lucifer effect (3) Discussion of how the concept of moral blindness apply to analyze administrative evil in organizations and corporations in relation to a kind of risk management that is blind to the moral consequences of management decisions (4) Conclusion and perspectives.


Business Ethic Risk Management Financial Crisis Business Organization Moral Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adams, Guy B., and Danny L. Balfour. 2009. Unmasking administrative evil, 3rd ed. London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Guy B., and V.H. Ingersoll. 1990. Culture, technical rationality, and organizational culture. American Review of Public Administration 20: 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alford, F.C. 1990. The organization of evil. Political Psychology 11: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alford, F.C. 2001. Whistleblowers, broken lives and organizational behavior. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, Hannah. 1950. Social science techniques and the study of concentration camps. In Echoes from the holocaust philosophical reflections on a dark time, ed. Allan Rosenberg, Gerald E. Myers, 365–378. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1964.Google Scholar
  7. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. Arendt, Hannah. 1964. Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. Arendt, Hannah. 1965. On revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. Arendt, Hannah. 1989. Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy, ed. R. Beiner. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bakan, Joel. 2004. The corporation. The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Oxford: Polity Press. 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1993. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Baumeister, R.E. 1997. Evil: Inside human cruelty and violence. New York: Freeman Press.Google Scholar
  15. Benhabib, Seyla (ed.). 2010. Politics in dark times. Encounters with Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bercowitz, Roger, Thomas Keenan, and Jeffrey Katz. 2010. Thinking in dark times. Hannah Arendt on ethics and politics. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bernstein, Richard J. 1996a. Hannah Arendt and the Jewish question. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bernstein, Richard J. 1996b. Did Hannah Arendt change her mind? From radical evil to the banality of evil. In Hannah Arendt, twenty years later, ed. Larry May and Jerome Kohn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bernstein, Richard J. 2002. Radical evil. A philosophical investigation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bernstein, Richard J. 2005. The Abuse of evil: Corruption of politics and religion since 9/11. Cambridge, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bird, Frederick Bruce. 1996. The muted conscience. Moral silence and practice of ethics in business. Conneticut and London: Quorums books.Google Scholar
  22. Black, Edwin. 2001. IBM and the Holocaust. The strategic alliance between Nazi-Germany and America’s most powerful corporation. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Darley, J.M. 1992. Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry 3: 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finkelstein, Norman G. 2000. The Holocaust industry. Reflections on the exploitation of Jewish suffering. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  25. Finkelstein, Norman G., and Ruth Bettina Birn. 1998. A nation on trail. The Goldhagen thesis and historial truth. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert, S.J. 1981. Another look at the Milgram obedience studies: The role of the graduated series of shocks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4: 690–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldhagen, Daniel J. 1996. Hitler’s willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  28. Goodpaster, Kenneth E. 2007. Conscience and corporate culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Hilberg, Raul. 1961 The destruction of the European Jews, 3rd edn. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
  30. Ishiguro, Kazuo. 1993. The remains of the days. New York: Vintage International Edition.Google Scholar
  31. Kateb, George. 1993. Hannah Arendt, politics, conscience, evil. New Jersey: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
  32. Kelman, H.C., and V.L. Hamilton. 1989. Crimes of obedience. Towards a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lifton, Robert J. 1986. The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Luban, David. 2003. Integrity: Its causes and cures. Fordham Law Review 72: 279–310.Google Scholar
  35. Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to authority, An experimental view. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  36. Rubenstein, R.L. 1975. The cunning of history. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  37. Sorkin, Andrew R. 2010. Too big to fail. The inside story of how Washington and wall street fought to save the financial system – and themselves. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Vetlesen, Arne Johan. 2005. Evil and human agency. Understanding collective evildoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vila, Dana. 1999. Politics, philosophy terror. Essays on the thought of Hannah Arendt. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  40. Werhane, Patricia H. 1998. Moral imagination and the search for ethical decision-making in management. London: The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  41. Zimbardo, P.G. 2004. A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In The social psychology of good and evil, ed. A.G. Miller, 21–50. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Zimbardo, P.G. 2007. The Lucifer effect. How good people turn evil. Reading: Ramdom House Group Company.Google Scholar
  43. Zimbardo, P.G., C. Maslach, and C. Haney. 2000. Reflections on the Stanford prison experiment: Genesis, transformations, consequences. In Obedience to authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram paradigm, ed. T. Blass, 193–237. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Roskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations