Advertisement

Integrating Durability in Marine Composite Certification

  • Andreas T. Echtermeyer
Chapter
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 208)

Abstract

A brief overview is given on how design standards are written. Static strength, fatigue, stress rupture, damage tolerance and the effect of the environment are addressed. Examples are given to show how durability is or can be addressed in design standards. Extensive testing is required today to certify long-term properties. Suggestions for research topics to reduce the test effort are discussed.

Keywords

Pressure Vessel Design Standard Matrix Crack Stress Rupture Cyclic Fatigue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Mørk KJ, Sødahl N, Bjørnsen T (2000) Optimised design procedures for deep water risers. Deep water pipeline and riser technology conference, Houston, 7–9 March 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mørk KJ, Sødahl N, Souza L (2000) Present and future fatigue analysis procedures for dynamic risers. In: Proceedings of OMAE’ 2001, 20th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–8 June 2001Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DNV Recommended Practice DNV-RP-A203 Qualification of new technology 2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DNV Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C501 Composite components 2010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DNV Recommended Practice DNV-RP-F202 Composite risers 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DIN 55303-2, Statistische Auswertung von Daten; Testverfahren und Vertrauensbereiche für Erwartungswerte und Varianzen 1984Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halpin JC (1984) Primer on composite materials: analysis. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agarwal BD, Broutman LW, Chandrashekhara K (2006) Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 3rd edn. Jhon Wiley & Sons, July 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniel IM, Ishai O (2005) Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, USA, July 2005Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    British Standard BS 4994—(1987) Design and construction of vessels and tanks in reinforced plasticsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salama MM, Stjern G, Storhaug T, Spencer B, Echtermeyer A (2002) The first offshore field installation for a composite riser joint, OTC 14018. Offshore technology conference, Houston, Texas, 6–9 May 2002Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Echtermeyer T, Kensche C, Bach P, Poppen M, Lilholt L, Andersen SI, Brønsted P (1996) Method to predict fatigue lifetimes of GRP wind turbine blades and comparison with experiments. In: Proceedings of the 1996 European Union wind energy conference and exhibition, 20–24 May, Göteborg, Sweden, H.P. Stephens&Associates, Bedford, UK, pp 907–913 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ronold KO, Echtermeyer AT (1996) Estimation of fatigue curves for design of composite laminates. Compos A 27A:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Storhaug T, Echtermeyer AT, Sund OE, Salama MM, Bjørn P (2002) Composite tethers—qualified for ultra deep waters. Deepwater Offshore Technology (DOT), New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 14692 Petroleum and natural gas industries—glass-reinforced plastics (GRP) piping, parts, 1–4 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    FRP-3-Guideline for filament wound composite cylinders with non load sharing liners, 2nd edn. CGA C-19-2002, Compressed Gas Association, Inc., Chantilly, 2002Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ANSI/CSA NGV2-2000, American National Standard for “Basic requirements for compressed gas vehicle (NGV) fuel containers”, 3rd edn. CSA International, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, March 2000Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO/DIS 11119-3.2 Gas cylinders of composite construction—specification and test methods—part 3: fully wrapped fiber reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450L with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic linersGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO/DIS 11515.2 Gas cylinders—refillable composite reinforced tubes of water capacity between 450L and 3,000L—design, construction and testingGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DNV Rules for high speed, light craft and naval surface craft, part 3 Chapter 4, “Hull structural design, fibre composite and sandwich constructions” 2011Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pipes RB (1974) Interlaminar fatigue characteristics of fibre reinforced composite materials. Composite materials: testing and design (3rd conference), ASTM STP 546, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia Pa., 1974, pp 419–432Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Echtermeyer AT, Ekeberg TS, Sund OE (2004) Long-term testing of composite through-thickness properties. Research report 131, Health and Safety Executive, HSE, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutherland LS, Guedes Soares C (2005) Impact behaviour of typical marine composite laminates. Compos B Eng 37(2–3):89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abrate S (1998) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aymerich F, Dore F, Priolo P (2009) Simulation of multiple delaminations in impacted cross-ply laminates using a finite element model based on cohesive interface elements. Compos Sci Technol 69(11–12):1699–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinho STD, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Iannucci L, Robinson P (2005) Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity. NASA technical reports, NASA/TM-2005-213530, L-19089Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perillo G, Vedvik NP, Echtermeyer AT Low velocity impact on GRP plates. NTNU, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozdil F, Carlsson LA (2000) Characterization of mixed mode delamination growth in glass/epoxy composite cylinders. J Compos Mater 34:420–441Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Morais AB, Silva JF, Marques AT, de Castro PT (2002) Mode II interlaminar fracture of filament wound angle-ply specimens. Appl Compos Mater 9(2):117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Davies P, Rannou F (1994) The effect of defects in tubes: part 1. Mode I delamination resistance. Appl Compos Mater 1(5):333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    ISO TS 24817 Composite repairs for pipework—qualification and design, installation, testing and inspection 2008Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    DNV Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C301 Design, fabrication, operation and qualification of bonded repair of steel structures 2012Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ramirez FA, Carlsson LA, Acha BA (2008) Evaluation of water degradation of vinylester and epoxy matrix composites by single fiber and composite tests. J Mater Sci 43(15):5230–5242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    API 17J “Specification for unbonded flexible pipe”, 3rd edition, 1 January 2009, ISO 13628-2:2006 (Identical), Petroleum and natural gas industries—design and operation of subsea production systems—part 2: unbonded flexible pipe systems for subsea and marine application, 2006Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    API (2003) The ageing of PA-11 in flexible pipes. API technical report 17TR2. API Publishing Services, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown D, Clarke JHR (1991) Molecular dynamics simulation of an amorphous polymer under tension. 1. phenomenology. Macromolecules 24(8): 2075–2082. 7Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lavine MS, Waheed N et al (2003) Molecular dynamics simulation of orientation and crystallization of polyethylene during uniaxial extension. Polymer 44(5):1771–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hossain D, Tschopp MA et al (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of deformation mechanisms of amorphous polyethylene. Polymer 51(25):6071–6083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sahputra IH, Echtermeyer AT Effect of temperature and strain rate on the deformation of amorphous polyethylene: comparison between molecular dynamics simulations and experimental results. NTNU, to be publishedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Det Norske VeritasHøvikNorway

Personalised recommendations