Advertisement

Risk Assessment and Toxic Effects of Exposure to Nanoparticles Associated with Natural and Anthropogenic Sources

  • Atar S. Pipal
  • Ajay Taneja
  • Gautam Jaiswar
Conference paper

Abstract

Humans have been exposed to airborne particles, especially to nanoscale particles, during their developing period, but this exposure has increased enormously over the last century due to anthropogenic sources. This increase is due mainly to combustion processes where these particles are released to the environment unintentionally but the rapidly growing field of nanotechnology is likely to become yet another source for such very small particles. Nanoparticles are natural products but their tremendous commercial use has encouraged the synthesis of these fine and ultrafine particles. Accelerated production of these particles may lead to increased risks to humans and the environment. Therefore, a detailed understanding of their sources, release interaction with environment and possible risk would provide a basis for safer use of engineered nanoparticles with minimal or hazardous impact on environment. Each of these particles carries different blends of chemicals and therefore poses a different health risk. Keeping all these points in mind the present work provides up to date information on sources, different types of interaction with environment and possible strategies for risk management of nanoparticles. An understanding makes a major contribution to the risk management that is needed to ensure that utilization of nanoparticles is made safely, is exploited to their full potential and disposed off safely.

Keywords

Adverse Health Effect Number Concentration Ultrafine Particle Biomass Fuel Risk Assessment Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Murr LE, Garza KM (2009) Natural and anthropogenic environmental nanoparticulates: their microstructural characterization and respiratory health implications. Atmos Environ 43:2683–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Massey DD, Masih J, Taneja A (2010) Real room measurements of fine particles in the range of 250–1000 nanometers in photocopier and printer centers in India. In: Proceedings of the international conference on nanoscience and technology in chemistry, health, environment, and energy, Tata McGraw Hill, Agra, pp 296–300Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen KA, Koponen LK, Clausen PA, Schneider T (2009) Dustiness behaviour of loose and compacted Bentonite and organoclay powders: what is the difference in exposure risk. J Nanopart Res 11:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becher S, Soukup JM, Sioutas C, Cassee FR (2003) Response of human alveolar macrophages to ultrafine, fine and coarse urban air pollution particles. Exp Lung Res 29:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pimentel D, Cooperstein S, Randell H, Filiberto D, Sorrentino S, Kaye B (2007) Ecology of increasing diseases: population growth and environmental degradation. Hum Ecol 35:653–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oberdorster G (2001) Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Englert N (2004) Fine particles and human health. Toxicol Lett 149:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pope CA, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:709–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frampton MW (2001) Systematic and cardiovascular effects of airway injury and inflammation: ultrafine particle exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect 109:S529–S532Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donaldson K, Tran CL (2002) Inflammation caused by particles and fibers. Inhal Toxicol 14:5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nel A (2005) Atmosphere. Air-pollution-related illness: effects of particles. Science 308:804–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Amato G, Liccordi G (1998) Outdoor environmental injury of the airways and development of allergic respiration diseases. Pulm Pharmacol 11:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson RL Jr (2004) Relative effects of air pollution on lungs & heart. Circulation 109:5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koenig JQ, Mar TF, Allen RW (2005) Pulmonary effects of indoor and outdoor generated particles in children with asthma. Environ Health Perspect 113:499–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schulte P, Geraci C, Zumwalde R, Hoover M, Kuempel E (2008) Occupational risk management of engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Hyg 5:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buzea C, Blandino IIP, Robbie K (2007) Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2:MR17–MR172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poschl U (2005) Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:7520–7540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niemi JV, Saarikoski S, Tervahattu H, Makela T, Hillamo R, Vehkamaki H, Sogacheva L, Kulmala M (2006) Changes in background aerosol composition in Finland during polluted and clean periods studied by TEM/EDX individual particle analysis. Atmos Chem Phys 6:5049–5066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor DA (2002) Dust in the wind. Environ Health Perspect 110:A80–A87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rogers F, Arnott P, Zielinska B, Sagebiel J, Kelly KE, Wagner D, Lighty JS, Sarofim AF (2005) Real time measurements of jet aircraft engine exhausts. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 55:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bigert C, Gustavsson P, Hallqvist J, Hogstedt C, Lewne M, Plato N, Reuterwall C, Scheele P (2003) Myocardial infarction among professional drivers. Epidemiology 14:333–339Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    See SW, Balasubramanian R (2006) Risk assessment of exposure to indoor aerosols associated with Chinese cooking. Environ Res 102:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    World Health Organisation (1999) Air Management Information System (AMIS). World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith KR (2002) Indoor air pollution in developing countries: recommendations for research. Indoor Air 2:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Family Health Survey (1995) National health family survey (MCH) and family planning: India. International Institute for Population Sciences, BombayGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garshick E, Schenker MB, Mumoz A, Segal T, Smith TJ, Woskiw S, Hammond SK, Speizer FE (1988) A retrospective cohort study of lung cancer and diesel enhaust exposure in railroad workers. Am Rev Respir Dis 137:820–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balakrishnan K, Mehta S, Kumar P, Ramaswamy PSS, Kumar SK (2004) Indoor air pollution associated with household fuel use in India, an exposure assessment and modeling exercise in rural districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. The World Bank Report, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pipal AS, Kulshrestha A, Taneja A (2011) Characterization and morphological analysis of airborne PM2.5 and PM10 in Agra located in north central India. Atmos Environ 45:3621–3630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mossman BT, Bignon J, Corn M, Seaton A, Gee JBL (1990) Asbestos: scientific developments and implications for public policy. Science 247:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fubuni B, Aust AE, Bolton RE, Borm PJ, Bruch J, Ciapett G (2008) Non-animal tests for evaluating the toxicity of solid xenobiotics. Altern Lab Anim 26:579–615Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jia G, Wang H, Yan L, Wang X, Pel R, Yan T, Zhao Y, Guo X (2005) Cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials: single wall nanotube, multiwall nanotube, and fullerene. Environ Sci Technol 39:1378–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster T (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Warheit DB, Brock WJ, Lee KP, Webb TR, Reed KL (2005) Comparative pulmonary toxicity inhalation and instillation studies with different TiO2 particle formulations: impact of surface treatments on particle toxicity. Toxicol Sci 88:514–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Derbyshire E (2005) Natural aerosolic mineral dusts and human health. In: Selinus B, Allowway B, Centebo JA, Finkelman RB, Ruge R, Lindh U, Smedley P (eds) Essentials of medical geology. Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp 459–480Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ferris BG, Speizer FE, Spengler JD, Dockery D, Bishop YMM, Wolfson M, Humble C (1979) Effects of sulfur oxides and respirable particles on human health. Methodology and demography of populations in study. Am Rev Respir Dis 120:767–779Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shi ZB, Shao LY, Jones TP, Whittaker AG, Lu SL, Berube KA, He T, Richards RJ (2003) Characterization of airborne individual particles collected in an urban area, a satellite city and a clean air area in Beijing, 2001. Atmos Environ 37:4097–4108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sondreal EA, Benson SA, Pavlish JH, Ralston NVC (2004) An overview of air quality III: mercury, trace elements, and particulate matter. Fuel Process Technol 85:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ketzel M, Wahlin P, Kristensson A, Swietlicki E, Berkowicz R, Nielsen OJ, Palmgren F (2004) Particle size distribution and particle mass measurements at urban, near-city and rural level in the Copenhagen area and southern Sweden. Atmos Chem Phys 4:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carbon B (2004) Health effects of PM10 in New Zealand, Air quality technical report no. 39–2003. Ministry for the Environment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mueller-Anneling L, Avol E, Peters JM, Thorne PS (2004) Ambient endotoxin concentrations in PM10 from southern California. Environ Health Perspect 112:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wheeler AJ, Williams I, Beaumont RA, Hamilton RS (2000) Characterisation of particulate matter sampled during a study of children’s personal exposure to airborne particulate matter in a UK urban environment. Environ Monit Assess 65:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shah AP, Pietropaoli AP, Frasier LM, Speers DM, Chalupa DC, Delehanty JM, Huang L-S, Utell MJ, Frampton MW (2008) Effect of inhaled carbon ultrafine particles on reactive hyperemia in healthy human subjects. Environ Health Perspect 116:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W (1998) Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fissan H (2008) Nachhaltige Nanotechnologie, Nordrhein-Westfalische Akademie der Wissenschaften-Vortrage I 21. Frediand Schoningh, Paderborn. ISBN 978-3-506-76565-9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryDr. B. R. Ambedkar UniversityAgraIndia

Personalised recommendations