Advertisement

Social Networks and Reduction of Risk in Disasters: An Example of the Wenchuan Earthquake

  • Zhao Yandong 
Chapter
Part of the Quality of Life in Asia book series (QLAS, volume 4)

Abstract

Social capital and social networks are considered as the most dependable resources in the aftermath of natural disasters. Based on the data from a rapid needs assessment survey after the May 12 earthquake in Sichuan, China, this chapter describes the role of social networks in the search and rescue of victims and providing information and support and maintaining the mental health of the affected population. The theoretical and policy implications are also discussed.

Keywords

Social Network Social Capital Wenchuan Earthquake Network Member Mental Health Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguirre, E. (1988). The lack of warning before the Saragosa Tornado. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 6, 65–74.Google Scholar
  2. Aguirre, E., Wenger, D., Glass, T., Diaz-Murillo, M., & Vigo, G. (1995). The social organization of search and rescue: Evidence from the Guadalajara Gasoline Explosion. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 13, 93–106.Google Scholar
  3. Bian, Y., & Li, Y. (2000). Social network capital of Chinese urban families. Tsinghua Sociological Review, 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Bolin, R., & Klenow, D. (1983). Response of elderly to disaster: An age-stratified analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 16, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drabek, T., & Key, W. (1984). Conquering disaster: Family recovery and long-term consequences. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  6. Drabek, T., Taminga, J., Kilijanek, T., & Adams, C. (1981). Managing multiorganizational emergency responses: Emergent search and rescue networks in natural disasters and remote area settings. Boulder: Institute of Behavior Science, University of Colombia.Google Scholar
  7. Dynes, R. (2005). Community social capital as the primary basis for resilience (Preliminary Paper No. 344). Newark DE: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzpatrick, C., & Mileti, D. (1994). Public risk communication. In R. Dynes & K. Tierney (Eds.), Disasters, collective behavior, and social organizations (pp. 71–84). Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  9. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak tie. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haines, V., Hurlbert, J., & Beggs, J. (1996). Exploring the determinants of support provision: Provider characteristics, personal networks, community contexts, and support following life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37(3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobfoll, S. (1988). The ecology of stress. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  12. Hobfoll, S., & Lerman, M. (1989). Predicting receipt of social support: A longitudinal study of parents’ reactions to their child’s illness. Health Psychology, 8, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurlbert, J., Haines, V., & Beggs, J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations? American Sociological Review, 65(4), 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. (1995a). In search of altruistic community: Patterns of social support mobilization following Hurricane Hugo. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 447–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. (1995b). Mobilization and deterioration of social support following natural disasters. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(3), 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreps, G. (1984). Sociological inquiry and disaster research. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lechat, M. (1989). Corporal damage as related to building structure and design. Lovain: Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster, Catholic University.Google Scholar
  18. Lin, N. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 131–147). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Raffaella, Y. N. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1982). Natural hazards and public choice: The state and local politics of hazards mitigation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  24. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Yang, T., Huang, L., & Wu, Z. (2003). The validity of Chinese health questionnaire in the mental disorder studies in mainland China. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 24, 769–773.Google Scholar
  26. Zhao, Y. (2002). Social capital in re-employment: Its efficacy and limit. Sociological Research, 100(4), 43–54. Retrieved online at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/CJFD_en_New/Detail.ashx?t=e&url=/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ200204006.htm.
  27. Zhao, Y. (2007). Social capital and post-disaster recovery: A sociological study on disaster. Sociological Research, 131(5), 164–187. Retreived online at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ200705009.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Science, Technology and SocietyChinese Academy of Science and Technology for DevelopmentBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations