Historical Review of Advance Directives

Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 54)

Abstract

As medicine progresses, many people are increasingly concerned about being dependent on physicians in times of severe illness. The wish to influence future medical treatment, and especially to refuse measures such as mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in certain situations, led to the development of advance directives. These provide instructions for situations in which the patient is no longer able to consent to or refuse medical treatment. Various kinds of advance directives were developed in the US in the 1970s and 1980s, and subsequently also in other countries. Today, regulations governing the validity and legal authority of advance directives exist in the US and in many European countries. The fact that these regulations differ widely reflects the varying importance attached by different countries to patient autonomy, on the one hand, and the obligation of physicians or the state to provide care and protect human life, on the other.

Keywords

Advance Directive Legal Regulation Advance Care Planning Artificial Nutrition Psychological Continuity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Linda Hüllbrock for assistance with translation and Bernd Alt-Epping for constructive criticism.

References

  1. Aigner, G. 2007. Das Patientenverfügungs-Gesetz. Historie und Ausgangslage. In Das österreichische Patientenverfügungsgesetz. Ethische und rechtliche Aspekte, ed. U. Körtner, Ch. Kopetzki, and M. Kletecka-Pulker, 74–80. Wien/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Binet, J.R. 2008. France. In: Country reports on advance directives, ed. S. Brauer, N. Biller-Andorno, and R. Andorno, 27–29. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  3. Brauer, S. 2007. Die Patientenverfügung in der Schweiz. Bioethica Forum 55: 26–28.Google Scholar
  4. Brauer, S., N. Biller-Andorno, and R. Andorno (eds.). 2008. Country reports on advance directives. http://www.ethik.uzh.ch/ibme/veranstaltungsarchiv/2008/ESF-CountryReports.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  5. Brown, B.A. 2003. The history of advance directives: A literature review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 29(4): 4–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, A.E., and D.W. Brock. 1989. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Childress, J.F. 1982. Who should decide? Paternalism in health care. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Council of Europe. 1997a. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  9. Council of Europe. 1997b. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine. Explanatory report. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Reports/Html/164.htm. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  10. Cugliari, A.M., T. Miller, and J. Sobal. 1995. Factors promoting completion of advance directives in the hospital. Archives of Internal Medicine 155: 1893–1898.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Damato, A.N. 1993. Advance directives for the elderly: A survey. New Jersey Medicine 90: 215–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Faden, R.R., and T.L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fagerlin, A., P.H. Ditto, J.H. Danks, R.M. Houts, and W.D. Smucker. 2001. Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments. Health Psychology 20: 166–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feinberg, J. 1971. Legal paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1: 105–124.Google Scholar
  15. Geth, C. 2010. Passive Sterbehilfe. Basler Studien zur Rechtswissenschaft. Reihe C, Strafrecht. Band 24. Basel: Helbing Lichtenhag.Google Scholar
  16. Inthorn J., and M. Kletecka-Pulker. 2008. Austria. In: Country reports on advance directives, ed. S. Brauer, N. Biller-Andorno, and R. Andorno, 5–11. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  17. Kutner, L. 1969. Due process of euthanasia: The living will, a proposal. Indiana Law Journal 44: 539–554.Google Scholar
  18. Lehmann, L. 2008. USA. In: Country reports on advance directives, ed. S. Brauer, N. Biller-Andorno, and R. Andorno, 103–107. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  19. Meier, D.E., B.R. Fuss, D. O’Rourke, et al. 1996. Marked improvement in recognition and completion of health care proxies: A randomized controlled trial of counseling by hospital patient representatives. Archives of Internal Medicine 156: 1227–1232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meran, J.G., S.E. Geissendörfer, A.T. May, and A. Simon (eds.). 2002. Möglichkeiten einer standardisierten Patientenverfügung. Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Gesundheit. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
  21. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Patzig, G. 1989. Gibt es eine Gesundheitspflicht. Ethik Medicine 1(1): 3–12.Google Scholar
  23. Rubin, S.M., W. Strull, M.F. Fialkow, et al. 1994. Increasing the completion of the durable power of attorney for health care: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 271: 209–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rurub, M. 2008. The Netherlands. In: Country reports on advance directives, ed. S. Brauer, N. Biller-Andorno, and R. Andorno, 53–58. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  25. Schöne-Seifert, B. 1996. Medizinethik. In Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung, ed. J. Nida-Rümelin, 552–648. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
  26. Seoane, J.A., and Simón, P. 2008. Spain. In: Country reports on advance directives, ed S. Brauer, N. Biller-Andorno, and R. Andorno, 83–87. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  27. Simon, A. 2010. Medizinethische Aspekte. In Patientenverfügungen: Rechtliche und ethische Aspekte, ed. D. Sturma, D. Lanzerath, and B. Heinrichs, 59–109. Freiburg/Br.: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  28. Teno, J., J. Lynn, N. Wenger, et al. 1997. Advance directives for seriously Ill hospitalized patients: Effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45: 500–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Turone, F. 2009. Doctors announce death of woman at centre of Italian ‘right to die’ case. BMJ 338: b574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turone, F. 2011. Italian law on advance directives offers no choice for patients. BMJ 343: d4610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilkinson, A., N. Wenger, and L.R. Shugarman. 2007. Literature review on advance directives. Prepared for office of disability, aging and long-term care policy, office of the assistant secretary for planning and evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2007/advdirlr.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  32. Zucker, M.B. (ed.). 1999. The right to die debate: A documentary history. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academy for Ethics in MedicineGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations