Choruses are the result of contemporary vocalization of several individuals and species at a precise time of the day (dawn or dusk).
Several hypotheses have been presented in recent years. First, the beginning of the chorus activity is species specific, and this can be explained with body size and eye size.
Intrinsic factors, environmental factors, and social factors can concur in the chorus performance.
Among the several hypotheses to explain this phenomenon, the acoustic transmission hypothesis has received much credit. This hypothesis claims a more favorable condition of acoustic transmission at dawn and at dusk for a quieter atmosphere and the lowest background noise. Reduced foraging efficiency at dawn and at dusk and an excess of food storage the day before are further good arguments.
In amphibians choruses are very common, energetically costly, and occur especially during the short reproductive period. In frogs, a cooperative hypothesis according to which a chorus produces benefits in the entire population is opposed to a competitive hypothesis in which a leading caller is preferred in sexual selection.
In birds there is considerable evidence that choruses can be explained by at least two major hypotheses: an energetic hypothesis and a behavioral hypothesis. According to the first hypothesis, the choruses are performed in coincidence with a food surplus or fat reserves. The second hypothesis considers the choruses as an interactive communication between concurrent males that seem a reaction to the previous day’s vocal interactions between males.
Song Type Wood Frog Playback Experiment Fertile Period Song Rate
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Amrhein V, Erne N (2006) Dawn singing reflects past territorial challenges in the winter wren. Anim Behav 71:1075–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett CA, Briskie JW (2007) Energetic state and performance of dawn chorus in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bee MA (2007) Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sound of a chorus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown TJ, Handford P (2003) Why birds sing at dawn: the role of consistent song transmission. Ibis 145:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush JS, Narins PM (1989) Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour. Anim Behav 37:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt JM, Vehrencamp SL (2005) Dawn chorus as an interactive communication network. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cato DH (1978) Marine biological choruses observed in tropical waters near Australia. J Acoust Soc Am 64(3):736–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthill IC, Macdonald WA (1990) Experimental manipulation of the dawn and dusk chorus in the blackbird Turdus merula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Spain GL, Batchelor HH (2006) Observations of biological choruses in the southern California Bight: a chorus at mid frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 10(4):1942–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelsteen T, Mathevon N (2002) Why do songbirds sing intensively at dawn? A test of the acoustic transmission hypothesis. Acta Ethol 4:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne N, Amrhein V (2008) Long-term influence of simulated territorial intrusions on dawn and dusk singing in the winter wren: spring versus autumn. J Ornithol 149:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farina A, Pieretti N, Piccioli L (2011) The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: a Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecol Inform 6(6):354–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farina A, Pieretti N, Morganti N (2013) Acoustic patterns of an invasive species: the red-billed Leiothrix (Leiothrix lutea Scopoli 1786) in a Mediterranean shrubland. Bioacoustics 22(3):175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish JF, Cummings WC (1972) A 50-dB increase in sustained ambient noise from fish (Cynoscion xanthulus). J Acoust Soc Am 52(4):1266–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote JR, Fitzsimmons LP, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2010) Black-capped chickadee dawn choruses are interactive communication networks. Behaviour 147:1219–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafe TU (1997) Use of metabolic substrates in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor: implications for calling behavior. Copeia 1997:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafe TU (2005) Anuran choruses as communication networks. In: McGregor P (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Greenfield MD (1994) Synchronous and alternating choruses in insects and anurans: common mechanisms and diverse functions. Am Zool 34:605–615Google Scholar
Hardouin LA, Robert D, Bretagnolle V (2008) A dusk chorus effect in a nocturnal bird: support for mate and rival assessment functions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1909–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood K, Fabrick A (1979) A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. Am Nat 114:260–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson JMC (2002) Two explanations of the dawn chorus compared: how monotonically changing light level favour a short break from singing. Anim Behav 64:527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacelnik A (1979) The foraging efficiency of great tits (Parus major) in relation to light intensity. Anim Behav 27:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2005) Seasonal variation in dawn song characteristics in the common nightingale. Anim Behav 70:1265–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller AP (1991) Why mated songbirds sing so much: mate guarding and male announcement of mate fertility status. Am Nat 138:994–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse DH (1989) Song patterns of warblers at dawn and dusk. Wilson Bull 101(1):26–35Google Scholar
Murphy MT, Sexton K, Dolan AC, Redmond LJ (2008) Dawn song of the eastern kingbird: an honest signal of male quality? Anim Behav 75:1075–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narins PM, Lewis ER, McClelland BE (2000) Hyperextended call note repertoire of the endemic Madagascar treefrog Boophis madascariensis (Rhacophoridae). J Zool 250:28–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet J, Helfer V, Yannic G (2007) Estimating population size in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) using individual recognition and chorus counts. Amphibia-Reptilia 28:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poesel A, Foerster K, Kempenaers B (2001) The dawn song of the blue tit Parus caeruleus and its role in sexual selection. Ethology 107:521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford C, Jeffs A, Tindle C, Montgomery JC (2008) Resonating sea urchin skeletons create coastal choruses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues M (1996) Song activity in the chiffchaff: territorial defence or mate guarding? Anim Behav 51:709–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz JJ (1993) Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staicer CA, Spector DA, Horn AG (1996) The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signaling. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
Thomas RJ, Cuthill IC (2002) Body mass regulation and the daily singing routines of European robins. Anim Behav 63:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas RJ, Szekely T, Cuthill IC, Harper DGC, Newson SE, Frayling TD, Wallis PD (2002) Eye size in birds and the timing of song at dawn. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar