GARCH Type Volatility Models Augmented with News Intensity Data

  • Sergei P. Sidorov
  • Paresh Date
  • Vladimir Balash
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


It is well-known that financial markets and investors react nervously to important news, economic crises, wars, political disorders or natural disasters. In such periods financial markets behave chaotically, prices of financial assets may fluctuate very much and volatility changes over time. Understanding the nature of such time dependence is very important for many macroeconomic and financial applications. In this paper we analyze the impact of extraneous sources of information on stock volatility by considering some augmented Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models. We will consider the ‘daily number of press releases on a stock’ (news intensity) as the most appropriate explanatory variable in the basic equation of GARCH model. The results of the likelihood ratio test indicate that the GARCH(1,1) model augmented with the news intensity performs better than the ‘pure’ GARCH model.


Stock Return Trading Volume GARCH Model Earning Announcement Brit Amer Tobacco 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to express our gratitude to Prof. Gautam Mitra, director of CARISMA, for the kindly provided opportunity to use Raven Pack news analytics data, and to Prof. Brendan McCabe and Keming Yu for helpful comments and remarks.


  1. Andersen TG (1996) Return volatility and trading volume: an information flow interpretation of stochastic volatility. J Finance 51:169–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry TD, Howe KM (1993) Public information arrival. J Finance 49:1331–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econometrics 31:307–327MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark PK (1973) A subordinated stochastich process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica 41:135–155MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox DR, Hinkley DV (1974) Theoretical statistics. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Ederington LH, Lee JH (1993) How markets process information: news releases and volatility. J Finance 48:1161–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epps T, Epps M (1976) The stochastic dependence of stochastic price changes and transaction volume: implications for the mixture of distribution hypothesis. Econometrica 44:305–321CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Francq C, Zakoan J-M (2010) Estimating GARCH models by quasi-maximum likelihood. In: GARCH models: structure, statistical inference and financial applications. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen P, Lunde A (2001) A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)? Working paper, Department of Economics, Brown UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris L (1987) Transaction data tests of the mixture of distributions hypothesis. J Financ Quant Anal 22:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janssen G (2004) Public information arrival and volatility persistence in financial markets. Eur J Finance 10:177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalev PS, Liu W-M, Pham PK, Jarnecic E (2004) Public information arrival and volatility of intraday stock returns. J Bank Finance 280(6):1447–1467Google Scholar
  13. Karpoff JM (1987) The relation between price changes and trading volume: a survey. J Financ Quant Anal 22:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim S, Shephard N, Chib S (1998) Stochastic volatility: likelihood inference and comparison with arch models. Rev Econ Stud 65:361–393CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamoureax CG, Lastrapes WD (1990) Heteroskedasticity in stock return data: volume versus GARCH effects. J Bus Econ Stat 2:253–260Google Scholar
  16. Lamoureax CG, Lastrapes WD (1991) Endogenous trading volume and momentum in stock-return volatility. J Finance 45:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee JH, Brorsen BW (1997) A Cox-type non-nested test for time series models. Appl Econ Lett 4:765–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell ML, Mulherin JH (1994) How markets process information: news releases and volatility. J Finance 49:923–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitra G, Mitra L (eds) (2001) The handbook of news analytics in finance. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Najand M, Yung K (1991) A GARCH examination of the relationship between volume and variability in futures markets. J Futures Markets 11:613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tauchen GE, Pitts M (1983) The price variability volume relationship on speculative markets. Econometrica 51:485–505CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergei P. Sidorov
    • 1
  • Paresh Date
    • 2
  • Vladimir Balash
    • 1
  1. 1.Saratov State UniversitySaratovRussian Federation
  2. 2.Brunel UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations