e-Learning Requirement in University

  • Zahraa F. MuhsenEmail author
  • Adi Maaita
  • Ashrf Odeah
  • Ayman Nsour
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Each development to the e-learning systems is a profit to the learning model. Most universities work with e-learning system as a main request at their education to automate the managing of learning events to get more flexibility in their learning system. This work compares e-learning systems, our study discuss the basis for choosing the most adequate one. The paper presents the results of the comparison of the most popular e-learning system. The comparison is based on various pedagogical and technical aspects. The open source factor supported the improvement of the e-learning which give great developed communities in many universities. Moodle is the most e-learning management system that has been chosen in many education processes. The article analyses three distance learning environments (Moodle, Blackboard, and Claroline).


Learn Management System Blackboard System Lightweight Directory Access Protocol Integrity Attack Layer Internet Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Fertalj K, Jerkovae H, Hluplae N (2006) Comparison of e-learning management systems. In: 5th WSEAS international conference on E-Activities, Venice, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abbad M, Morris D, de Nahlik C (2009) Looking under the bonnet: factors affecting student adoption of E-learning systems in Jordan. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 10:10–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hazaimeh H (2007) Foreign student enrollment rises in Jordanian universities, website of the embassy of Hashemite kingdom of Jordan Washington D.C. Accessed 21 Aug 2007
  4. 4.
    Mirza AA, Al-Abdulkareem M (2011) Models of e-learning adopted in the Middle East. Appl Comput Inform 9(2):83–93Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Ajlan A, Zedan H (2008) Why Moodle. In: 12th IEEE international workshop on future trends of distributed computing systems, pp 58–64Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar SA, Gankotiya K, Dutta K (2011) A comparative study of Moodle with other e-learning systems. In: Electronics computer technology (ICECT), 3rd international conference on, Kanyakumari, pp 414–418Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ponomariov K, Galdikiene S, Goštautaitė S (2007) Analysis and comparison of learning and control tools of virtual learning applications Moodle 1.6.1 and blackboard learning system ce 6.1 enterprise. Comput Model New Technol 11(3):28–34Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Machado M, Tao E (2007) Blackboard vs. Moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems. Paper presented at the 37th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Milwaukee, WI, S4J7–12Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miyazoe T (2007) LMS-based EFL blended learning: Blackboard vs. Moodle. In: JALT 2007 conference proceedings, pp 745–753Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Unal Z, Unal A (2011) Evaluating and comparing the usability of web-based course management systems. J Inf Technol Educ 10:19–38Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sumak B, Hericko M, Pusnik M, Polancic G (2011) Factors affecting acceptance and use of Moodle: an empirical study based on TAM. Int J Comput Inform 35(1):91–100Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M (2008) Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stake holders, analysis. Educ Technol Soc 11(3):26–36Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Som N (2003) E-learning: a guidebook of principles, procedures and practicesGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dougiamas M (2008) Moodle.
  15. 15.
    Gauthier F, Letarte D, Lavoie T, Merlo E (2011) Extraction and comprehension of moodle’s access control model: a case study. In: Privacy, security and Trust (PST), 9th annual international conference on 19–21 July 2011, 44–51, Montreal, QC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandal S (2011) Problem based learning tool as a plug-in for Moodle. Master thesis of technology submitted Indian institute of technologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zahraa F. Muhsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adi Maaita
    • 1
  • Ashrf Odeah
    • 1
  • Ayman Nsour
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Sciences DepartmentIsra UniversityAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations