Skip to main content

MOOC in Latin America: Implementation and Lessons Learned

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud

Abstract

A critical review on MOOCs is provided in this paper. A discussion on the different types of MOOCs and the design of a MOOC learning experience in South America forms the basis of this paper. The MOOC presented utilized cloud-based tools for deployment of the learning activities. Findings on usability, emotional and motivation aspects from 143 participants who had completed the MOOC course are discussed in this paper. Restrictions to pre-selected cloud-based tools and communication channels as well as guidance provided to the participants revealed positive learners’ attitudes on usability, emotional and motivation aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang V, Gütl C (2010) Generation Y learning in the 21st century: integration of virtual worlds and cloud computing services. In: Abas Z et al (eds) Proceedings of global learn Asia Pacific 2010. AACE, Penang, pp 1888–1897

    Google Scholar 

  2. Downes S (2005) E-learning 2.0. eLearning Magazine, October http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968. Accessed 26 Feb 2013

  3. Hernandez R, Linares BH, Mikroyannidis A, Schmitz H (2012) Cloud services within a ROLE-enabled personal learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on cloud education environments (WCLOUD 2012), vol 945. CEUR Workshop Proceedings ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fini A (2009) The technological dimension of a massive open online course: the case of the CCK08 course tools. Int Rev Res Open and Distance Learn. Special Issue—Openness and the Future of Higher Educ 10(5). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1402. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  5. Gütl C, Chang V (2008) Ecosystem-based theoretical models for learning in environments of the 21st century. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (iJET) 3: 50–60

    Google Scholar 

  6. McAuley A, Stewart B, Siemens G, Cormier D (2010) The MOOC model for digital practice. Last edited 2010. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  7. Rodriguez O (2013) The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis 5(1):67–73

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pisutova K (2012) Open education. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international conference on emerging elearning technologies and applications (ICETA), Stará Lesná, Slovakia, pp 297–300

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiley D (2009) Open teaching multiplies the benefit but not the effort, The Chronicle. http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/david-wiley-open-teaching-multiplies-the-benefit-but-not-the-effort/7271. Accessed 10 Mar 2013

  10. Couros A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. Emerging Technologies in Distance Education, pp 109–128. http://www.aupress.ca/books/120177/ebook/06_Veletsianos_2010-Emerging_Technologies_in_Distance_Education.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2013

  11. Siemens G (2012) MOOCs are really a platform. Elearnspace, last edited 25 July 2012. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/. Accessed 15 Feb 2013

  12. Daniel J (2012) Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J Interact Media Educ 18:1–32 http://jime.open.ac.uk/2012/18. Accessed 26 Feb 2013

  13. Hernandez R, Pardo A. Delgado C. (2007). Creating and deploying effective eLearning experiences using LRN. IEEE Trans Educ 50(4):345–351

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mackness J, Mak SFJ, Williams R (2010) The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning, pp 266–274

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vardi MY (2012) Will MOOCs destroy academia? Commun ACM 55(11):5. doi: 10.1145/2366316.2366317 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2366316.2366317

  16. Lane LM (2012) Three kinds of MOOCs. Lisa’s (Online) Teaching Blog, last edited August 15th, 2012. http://lisahistory.net/wordpress/2012/08/three-kinds-of-moocs/comment-page-1/. Accessed 14 Feb 2013

  17. deWaard I, Abajian S, Gallagher MS, Hogue R, Keskin N, Koutropoulos A, Rodriguez OC (2011) Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 12(7). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046. Accessed 26 Feb 2013

  18. Chamberlin L, Parish T (2011) MOOCs: Massive open online courses or massive and often obtuse courses? eLearn 2011, 8. doi: 10.1145/2016016.2016017 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2016016.2016017

  19. Gonick L (2013) The year ahead in IT. Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/03/predictions-about-higher-ed-technology-2013-essay. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  20. Hyman P (2012) In the year of disruptive education. Commun ACM 55(12):20–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin FG (2012) Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Commun ACM 55(8):26–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernandez R, Gütl C, Amado H, Al-Smadi M (2012) Facebook for CSCL, Latin-American experience for professors. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies iCalt2012, pp 327–328 doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2012.129 ISBN: 978-1-4673-1642-2

  23. Kay RH, Loverock S (2008) Assessing emotions related to learning new software: the computer emotion scale. Comput Hum Behav 24:1605–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tseng SC, Tsai CC (2010) Taiwan college students’ self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer-assessment environments. Internet and Higher Educ 13:164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of research collaboration resulting from visiting academic activities of Professor Christian Gütl at the School of Information Systems. The visits were supported and sponsored by School of Information Systems and Curtin Business School, Curtin University, and Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media (IICM) at Graz University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rizzardini, R.H., Gütl, C., Chang, V., Morales, M. (2014). MOOC in Latin America: Implementation and Lessons Learned. In: Uden, L., Tao, YH., Yang, HC., Ting, IH. (eds) The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7308-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics