Advertisement

What (Use) is a MOOC?

  • Russell Boyatt
  • Mike Joy
  • Claire Rocks
  • Jane Sinclair
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

The phenomenon of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) has spread with amazing speed. Many universities in the USA and Europe are now joining up with MOOC providers to allow free access to courses. Participant numbers for an individual course may reach hundreds of thousands. Expectations are high for what these courses can achieve in terms of opening access, widening participation and cost saving. In this paper we conduct a literature review to examine what is known about MOOCs (both those following the original connectivist model and the more traditionally didactic variety) and what indications there are that they can live up to such expectations. We discuss concerns arising from the review and identify issues including lack of evidence, absence of pedagogy, lack of support and unrealistic expectations particularly on beginner learners.

Keywords

Learning Objective Massive Open Online Course Digital Artefact Press Article Cheap Option 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Coursera (2013) https://www.coursera.org/. Accessed 19 March 2013
  2. 2.
    edX. https://www.edx.org/. Accessed 19 March 2013
  3. 3.
    Lewin T (2013) Universities abroad join partnerships on the web. The New York Times, 21 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Futurelearn. futurelearn.com. Accessed 19 March 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    iversity. http://www.iversity.org/. Accessed 19 March 2013
  6. 6.
    Walsh T (2011) Unlocking the gates: How and why leading universities are opening up access to their courses. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McAuley A, Stewart B, Siemens G, Cormier D (2010) Massive open online courses. Digital ways of knowing and learning. The MOOC model for digital practiceGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pisutova K (2012) Open courses. In: 10th IEEE international conference on emerging elearning technologies and applications, pp 297–300Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodriguez CO (2012) Moocs and the ai-stanford like courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. LearningGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Angel ES (2013) Massive list of MOOC resources, lit and literati. http://www.worldofwebcast.com/post/massive-list-of-mooc-resources-lit-and-literati. Accessed 19 March 2013
  11. 11.
    What you need to know about MOOCs, 19 March 2013Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pappano L (2012) The year of the MOOC. The New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Young JR (2012) Inside the Coursera contract: how an upstart company might profit from free courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19 July 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waldrop MM (2013) Massive open online courses, aka MOOCs, transform higher education and science. Scientific American, pp 223–236Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chamberlin L, Parish T (2011) MOOCs: massive open online courses or massive and often obtuse courses? eLearn 2011(8):1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mackness J, Mak S, Williams R (2010) The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In: Networked learning conference, University of Lancaster, pp 266–275Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snyder MD (2012) Much ado about MOOCs. Academe 98(6):55Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniel J (2012) Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J Interact Media in Educ 3: http://jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-18. Date accessed: 24 July 2013
  19. 19.
    Lewin T (2012) Education Site expands slate of universities and courses. The New York Times, 19 Sept 2012Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeSantis N (2012) After leadership crisis fueled by distance-ed debate. UVa will put free classes Online. The Chronicle of Higher Education 17 July 2012Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan L, Powell S (2013) MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education. A white paper. Technical report, JISC. Accessed 19 March 2013Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Downes S (2013) MOOCs are really a platform. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/. Accessed 19 March 2013
  23. 23.
    Bates T (2013) Harvards current thinking on MOOCs. http://tinyurl.com/a2uh86z. Accessed 19 March 2013
  24. 24.
    Cormier D, Siemens G (2010) The open course: through the open door–open courses as research, learning, and engagement. Educause Rev 45(4):30–32Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Masters K (2011) A brief guide to understanding MOOCs. Int J Med Educ 1(2)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fini A (2009) The technological dimension of a massive open online course: the case of the cck08 course tools. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 10(5):1–26Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kop R, Fournier H, Mak JSF (2011) A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 12(7):74–93Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mak S, Williams R, Mackness J (2010) Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In: Networked learing conference, University of Lancaster, pp 275–285Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fournier H, Kop R, Sitlia H (2011) The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environmentGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kop R (2011) The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: learning experiences during a massive open online course. The Int Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(3):19–38Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kop R, Carroll F (2012) Cloud computing and creativity: learning on a massive open online course. LearningGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    de Waard I, Abajian S, Gallagher MS, Hogue R, Keskin N, Koutropoulos A, Rodriguez OC (2011) Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand Chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 12(7):94–115Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Waard I, Koutropoulos A, Hogue RJ, Abajian SC, Keskin NÖ, Rodriguez CO, Gallagher MS (2012) Merging MOOC and mLearning for increased learner interactions. Int J Mob Blended Learn (IJMBL) 4(4):34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    de Waard I, Koutropoulos A, Özdamar Keskin N, Abajian SC, Hogue R, Rodriguez CO, Gallagher MS (2011) Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning. mLearn 12(7)94–115Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Downes S (2013) The MOOC guide. https://sites.google.com/site/themoocguide/home. Accessed 19 March 2013
  36. 36.
    Sadigh D, Seshia SA, Gupta M (2012) Automating exercise generation: a step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems. In: Proceedings of the workshop on embedded systems educationGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Belanger Y, Thornton J (2013) Bioelectricity: a quantitative approach. Duke Universitys First MOOC. Technical report, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heckel U, Bach U, Richert A, Jeschke S (2012) Massive open online courses in engineering education-a novel approach to teaching large classes. ICERI, pp 2330–2339Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Skiba DJ (2012) Disruption in higher education: massively open online courses (MOOCs). Nurs Educ Perspect 33(6):416–417MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bond P (2013) Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) for professional development and growth. In: Continuing education for librarians: essays on career improvement through classes, workshops, conferences and more, p 28Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Creed-Dikeogu G, Clark C (2013) Are you MOOC-ing yet? A review for academic libraries. Kansas Libr Assoc Coll Univ Libr Sect 3:9–13Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Armstrong L (2012) Coursera and MITx—sustaining or disruptive? http://www.changinghighereducation.com/2012/08/coursera-.html. Accessed 19 March 2013
  43. 43.
    Lukes D (2013) What is and what is not a MOOC: a picture of family resemblance (working undefinition). http://researchity.net/2012/08/14/what-is-and-what-is-not-a-mooc-a-picture-of-family-resemblance-working-undefinition-moocmooci. Accessed 19 March 2013
  44. 44.
    Rodriguez O (2013) The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs. Open Praxis 5(1):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Downes S (2007) An introduction to connective knowledge. In: Hug T(ed) Media, knowledge and education—exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologiesGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hill P (2012) MOOCs: two different approaches to scale, access and experimentation. http://mfeldstein.com/moocs-two-different-approaches-to-scale-access-and-experimentation. Accessed 19 March 2013
  47. 47.
    Siemens G (2012) MOOCs are really a platform. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/ Accessed 19 March 2013
  48. 48.
    Vihavainen A, Luukkainen M, Kurhila J (2012) Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. In: Connolly RW, Armitage WD (eds) SIGITE Conference. ACM, pp 171–176Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kolowich S, Without credit. Inside Higher Ed, 18 July 2012Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Siemens G (2005) Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn 2(1):3–10Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Anderson T, Dron J (2011) Three generations of distance education pedagogy. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 12(3):80–97Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kop R, Hill A (2008) Connectivism: learning theory of the future or vestige of the past. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 9(3):1–13Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Verhagen P (2006) Connectivism: a new learning theory? Connectivism: a new learning theory? Accessed 19 March 2013Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tschofen C, Mackness J (2012) Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 13(1):124–143Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kolowich S (2012) Georgia tech and Coursera try to recover from MOOC stumble. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 26 July 2012Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kolowich S (2013) Professor leaves a MOOC in mid-course in dispute over teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 18 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Clow D (2013) MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Third conference on learning analytics and knowledgeGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kern J (2013) Learning from Harvard: MOOC story. http://elearningindustry.com/subjects/concepts/item/450-learning-from-harvard-mooc-story-pt4. Accessed 19 March 2013
  59. 59.
    Rivard R (2013) Measuring the MOOC dropout rate. Inside Higher Ed, 8 March 2013Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hill P (2013) The four student archetypes emerging in MOOCs. http://mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/. Accessed 19 March 2013
  61. 61.
    Kirschner A (2012) A pioneer in online education tries a MOOC. http://chronicle.com/article/A-Pioneer-in-Online-Education/134662/, Accessed 19 March 2013
  62. 62.
    Lederman D (2013) Expanding pathways to MOOC credit. Inside Higher Ed, 7 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fain P, Rivard R (2013) Outsourcing public higher Ed. Inside Higher Ed, 13 March 2013Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gibbs L (2012) Coursera fantasy: yes, plagiarism: how sad is that? http://courserafantasy.blogspot.kr/2012/08/yes-plagiarism-how-sad-is-that.html Accessed 19 March 2013
  65. 65.
    Kolowich S (2013) The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 March 2013Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Martin F (2012) Fight the MOOC-opalypse! and Reflections on the aporia of learning. http://ccscne.org/ccscne2013/keynotes. Accessed 19 March 2013
  67. 67.
    Hill P (2012) MOOCs in 2012: dismantling the status quo. http://mfeldstein.com/moocs-in-2012-dismantling-the-status-quo/. Accessed 19 March 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations