Advertisement

Are There Positive Learning Effects of Online Access to Peer-Generated Questions?

  • Fu-Yun YuEmail author
  • Yen-Ting Yang
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This study examined the effects of online access to peer-generated questions during question-generation activities on question-generation performance. This study adopted a quasi-experimental research method. Two eighth grade classes (N = 63) were randomly assigned to different groups—the online access experimental group and the no access contrast group, and participated in six weekly question-generation sessions. An online student question-generation learning system was adopted to support the activity. Independent-sample t-tests done on student week-by-week question-generation performance did not reveal significant differences between the two groups in any of the 6 weeks. The implication of the study is provided.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown SI, Walter MI (2005) The art of problem posing, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drake JM, Barlow AT (2007) Assessing students’ levels of understanding multiplication through problem writing. Teach Child Math 14(5):272–277Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    English LD (1997) Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teach Child Math 4(3):172–179Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luxton-Reilly A (2012) The design and evaluation of studysieve, a tool that supports student-generated free-response questions, answers and evaluations. Unpublished Dissertation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenshine B, Meister C, Chapman S (1996) Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Rev Educ Res 66(2):181–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu FY, Liu YH (2008) The comparative effects of student question-posing and question-answering strategies on promoting college students’ academic achievement, cognitive and metacognitive strategies use. J Educ Psychol 31(3):25–52Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu FY, Liu YH, Chan TW (2005) A Web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations Educ Teach Int 42(4):337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu FY, Liu YH (2005) Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction. Int J Sci Educ 27(11):1319–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu FY (2009) Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Comput Hum Behav 25(5):1129–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Topping K (2008) Peer assisted learning. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torrance EP (1974) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Service, BensenvilleGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu FY, Wu CP (2011) Different identity revelation modes in an online peer-assessment learning environment: Effects on perceptions toward assessors, classroom climate and learning activities. Comput Educ 57(3):2167–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Kaohsiung CianFong Junior High SchoolKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations