Skip to main content

Leadership Styles and School Climate Variables of the Pashiardis-Brauckmann Holistic Leadership Framework: An Intimate Relationship?

Abstract

In this chapter, school climate variables are employed in order to explore school principals’ influence on student achievement through the Pashiardis-Brauckmann Holistic Leadership Framework. The aim is to identify the mechanisms through which leadership influences student learning. For the purposes of the LISA project, a number of school climate variables were used as mediating variables between the principal’s leadership styles and student achievement. All analyses pointed towards a model comprising seven such mediating factors. The seven school climate factors were labeled as follows: Professional Development Opportunities, Evaluation and Feedback, Teacher Commitment, Parental Involvement, Teaching and Learning Practices, Student-Teacher Interactions, and Student Expectations. Then, an analysis was performed that examined the degree to which school leadership styles reliably predicted school climate variables. The findings suggest that the Instructional, the Structuring, and the Entrepreneurial leadership styles are utilized by school principals in order to enhance student achievement.

Keywords

  • School Climate
  • Leadership Style
  • School Leader
  • Learn Practice
  • Professional Development Opportunity

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7290-8_5
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-7290-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 5.1

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that the responsibility for the school systems and schools in Germany rests within the different Länder (provinces). For more information, the reader is directed to Döbert (2007).

  2. 2.

    Again, the reader should be cautioned that each participating country was represented by four schools each which do not allow us to talk about Europe at large; however, we might be leading towards a European perspective of certain leadership styles since these communalities are described as trends across seven different school systems.

References

  • Barnett, K., & McCormick, J. (2004). Leadership and individual principal-teacher relationships in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 406–434.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(4), 338–356.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Döbert, H. (2007). Germany. In H. Döbert, W. Hörner, B. Kop, & W. Mitter (Eds.), Educational systems in Europe (pp. 299–325). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 221–239.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Effective leadership in schools facing challenging circumstances. London: NCSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, M. L., Witziers, B., & Sleegers, P. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1), 1–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, S. M., & Herrington, C. (2007). Revisiting the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 724–736.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pashiardis, P. (1998). Researching the characteristics of effective primary school principals in Cyprus. A qualitative approach. Educational Management & Administration, 26(2), 117–130.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pashiardis, P., & Brauckmann, S. (2008, November 13–15). Introduction to the LISA framework from a social systems perspective. Paper presented during the LISA conference, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petros Pashiardis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pashiardis, P., Brauckmann, S. (2014). Leadership Styles and School Climate Variables of the Pashiardis-Brauckmann Holistic Leadership Framework: An Intimate Relationship?. In: Pashiardis, P. (eds) Modeling School Leadership across Europe. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7290-8_5

Download citation