Skip to main content

Computing Meaning: Annotation, Representation, and Inference

  • Chapter
Computing Meaning

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 47))

Abstract

This chapter introduces the subsequent chapters in the book and how they are related, against the background of a discussion of the nature and the complexity of processes that compute the meanings of natural language expressions. The discussion focuses on three aspects of the computation of meanings that play an important part in later chapters: (1) the nature of meaning representations; (2) the integration of inferencing with compositional interpretation; and (3) the construction of semantically annotated corpora and their use in machine learning of meaning computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ISO (2012). ISO 24617-2: Semantic annotation framework, Part 2: Dialogue acts. International standard. Geneva: ISO, September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile, V., Bos, J., Evang, K., & Venhuizen, N. (2012). Developing a large semantically annotated corpus. In Proceedings of the eight international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey (pp. 3196–3200).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, P., & Bos, J. (2005). Representation and inference for natural language. A first course in computational semantics. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, P., Bos, J., Kohlhase, M., & De Nivelle, H. (2001). Inference and computational semantics. In H. Bunt, R. Muskens, & E. Thijsse (Eds.), Computing meaning (Vol. 2, pp. 11–28). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J. (2013). Recognising textual entailment and computational semantics. In H. Bunt, J. Bos, & S. Pulman (Eds.), Computing meaning (Vol. 4, pp. 89–105). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H. (1995). Dynamic interpretation and dialogue theory. In M. Taylor, F. Neél, & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue II (pp. 139–166). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H. (2000). Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. In H. Bunt & W. Black (Eds.), Abduction, belief and context in dialogue. Studies in computational pragmatics (pp. 81–150). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H. (2013). A methodology for designing semantic annotations (TiCC Technical Report TR 2013-001). Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H., & Muskens, R. (1999). Computational semantics. In H. Bunt & R. Muskens (Eds.), Computing meaning (Vol. 1, pp. 1–32). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S., & Pulman, S. (2007). Combining symbolic and distributional models of meaning. In Proceedings AAAI spring symposium on quantum interaction, Stanford (pp. 52–55).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., Crouch, D., van Eijck, J., Fox, C., van Genabith, J., Jaspars, J., Kamp, H., Milward, D., Pinkal, M., Poesio, M., & Pulman, S. (1996). The FRACAS consortium: Using the framework. Project FraCaS, a framework for computational semantics. Deliverable D16, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagan, I., Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., Greental, I., & Shnarch, E. (2008). Natural language as the basis for meaning representation and inference. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 4949. Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 151–170). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., & Martin, P. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63, 69–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCord, M. (1990). Slot grammar: A system for simpler construction of practical natural language grammars. In Natural language and logic: International scientific symposium (pp. 118–145). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. (Ed.) (1974) Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Deemter, K. (1996). Towards a logic of ambiguous expressions. In K. van Deemter & S. Peters (Eds.), Semantic ambiguity and underspecification (pp. 203–237). Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Bunt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunt, H., Bos, J., Pulman, S. (2014). Computing Meaning: Annotation, Representation, and Inference. In: Bunt, H., Bos, J., Pulman, S. (eds) Computing Meaning. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7284-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7284-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7283-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7284-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics