Advertisement

Professional Learning of Science Teachers

  • Jan H. Van Driel
Chapter
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 1)

Abstract

Professional learning of teachers, both pre-service and in-service, is a complex process. Only recently research has begun to demonstrate that what and how teachers learn from teacher education and professional development programmes has an impact on whether and how they change their knowledge and practice (Desimone et al. 2002; Fishman et al. 2003). Studies on teachers’ professional learning have shown that high-quality professional development programmes must entail a form of inquiry (Little 2001; Lotter et al. 2006) that enables (pre-service and in-service) teachers to actively construct knowledge through practice and reflection (Guskey 1986, 2002; Schön 1983). Moreover, it has become clear that multiple strategies are necessary to effectively promote teacher learning. Several review studies revealed that for strategies aimed at promoting professional learning of teachers to be successful, the following elements are important: (a) an explicit focus on teachers’ initial knowledge, beliefs and concerns, (b) opportunities for teachers to experiment in their own practice, (c) collegial co-operation or exchange among teachers and (d) sufficient time for changes to occur (e.g. Bell and Gilbert 1996; Garet et al. 2001; Hawley and Valli 1999; Hewson 2007; Van Veen et al. 2010).

Keywords

Science Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge Instructional Strategy Professional Learning Professional Development Programme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Dr. Rosária Justi and Dr. Dirk Wongsopawiro for allowing me to use the results of their studies and Dr. Amanda Berry for her help with the preparation of my plenary lecture and this chapter.

References

  1. Anderson, R. D.,& Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: National Association for Research in Science Teaching and National Science Teachers Association/Macmillan Publisher.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. M., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., Wubbels, T., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2000). The professional development of teachers. In R. J. Simons, J. van de Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  6. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.Google Scholar
  7. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  10. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.Google Scholar
  11. Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. (2002). Does professional development change teachers’ instruction? Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.Google Scholar
  12. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658.Google Scholar
  14. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38, 915–945.Google Scholar
  15. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.Google Scholar
  16. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.Google Scholar
  17. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.Google Scholar
  18. Hashweh, M. Z. (2003). Teacher accommodative change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 421–434.Google Scholar
  19. Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179–1203). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.Google Scholar
  22. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Investigating teachers’ ideas about models and modelling: Some issues of authenticity. In: Paper presented at the fourth international conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, 19–23 Aug 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). The use of the IMTPG as a framework for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 437–450.Google Scholar
  24. Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598.Google Scholar
  25. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.Google Scholar
  26. Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Little, J. W. (2001). Professional development in pursuit of school reform. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 28–44). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 185–216.Google Scholar
  29. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  30. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  32. Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571–588.Google Scholar
  33. Rhine, S. (1998). The role of research and teachers’ knowledge base in professional development. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 27–31.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  35. Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27–54). London: Palmer Press.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1151–1176). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Sprinthall, N. A., Reiman, A. J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 666–703). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Tom, A. R., & Valli, L. (1990). Professional knowledge for teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 372–392). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Science teacher education. In B. McGraw, P. L. Peterson, & E. Baker (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (pp. 712–718). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158.Google Scholar
  43. Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., Meirink, J., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professional development of teachers: A review study on the effective characteristics of professional interventions of teachers. (Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren). Leiden: ICLON/Expertisecentrum: Leren van Docenten.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: A review of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.Google Scholar
  45. Wongsopawiro, D. (2012). Examining science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the context of a professional development programme. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  46. Wubbels, T. (1992). Taking account of student teachers’ preconceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 137–150.Google Scholar
  47. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues and answers report, REL 2007, Vol. 033). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  48. Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 165–187.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of TeachingICLON – Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations