The Impact of a Context-Led Curriculum on Different Students’ Experiences of School Science
The aim of our research was to understand the classroom experiences of 14–16-year-old students studying science in England where a more context-led curriculum had been introduced into government-funded schools. We were interested in how students following different courses talked about their desires for, and experiences of, school science. This is in a context where most teachers have had little if any involvement in the development of the reform and in most cases limited training in the new curriculum content. Students from 19 schools across England took part in group interviews. We analysed students’ talk about what they want and what they get from school science, with particular emphasis on the newly introduced context-based content. Findings indicate that students taking three separate science qualifications (considered a ‘high-status’ academic route) tend to want to learn more canonical science since this interested them and would be useful for the future. Students taking applied science (a ‘lower-status’ science route) tend to want to learn more ‘real-life’ science since this would be useful in their future lives. The content of ‘real-life’ science was hard for many students to define but was generally not the broadly canonical science they typically experienced in the classroom.
KeywordsScience Education School Science Science Classroom Science Curriculum National Curriculum
The work reported here is one outcome of a 3 year study funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, grant number RES-179-25-0004. Thanks are extended to the teachers and students who participated in this research.
- Driver, R., Leach, J., et al. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- HM Treasury, DfES, et al. (2004). Science and innovation investment framework: 2004–2014. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
- Kanter, D. E., & Konstantopoulos S. (2010). The impact of a project-based science curriculum on minority student achievement, attitudes, and careers: The effects of teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based practices. Science Education, 94, 855–887.Google Scholar
- Kind, V. (2007). Context-based science: A ‘gift-horse’ for the talented? In K. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners. London: Routledge. xv, 240 p.Google Scholar
- Kortland, K. (2005). Physics in personal, social and scientific contexts: A retrospective view on the Dutch physics curriculum development project PLON. In P. Nentwig & D. J. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant : Context based learning of science. Munchen/New York: Waxmann. 359 p.Google Scholar
- Mandl, H., & Kopp, B. (2005). Situated learning: Theories and models. In P. Nentwig & D. J. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context based learning of science (pp. 15–34). Munchen: Waxmann.Google Scholar
- Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.Google Scholar
- Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College, School of Education.Google Scholar
- Morris, H. E. (2012). Girls’ responses to the teaching of socioscientific issues. Leeds: University of Leeds. School of Education, PhD.Google Scholar
- Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success. The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: H. Treasury.Google Scholar
- Ryder, J., & Banner I. (2013). School teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490–514.Google Scholar
- Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction – two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar