Abstract
The aim of our research was to understand the classroom experiences of 14–16-year-old students studying science in England where a more context-led curriculum had been introduced into government-funded schools. We were interested in how students following different courses talked about their desires for, and experiences of, school science. This is in a context where most teachers have had little if any involvement in the development of the reform and in most cases limited training in the new curriculum content. Students from 19 schools across England took part in group interviews. We analysed students’ talk about what they want and what they get from school science, with particular emphasis on the newly introduced context-based content. Findings indicate that students taking three separate science qualifications (considered a ‘high-status’ academic route) tend to want to learn more canonical science since this interested them and would be useful for the future. Students taking applied science (a ‘lower-status’ science route) tend to want to learn more ‘real-life’ science since this would be useful in their future lives. The content of ‘real-life’ science was hard for many students to define but was generally not the broadly canonical science they typically experienced in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52.
Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., et al. (2010). Doing science versus being a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We Be Burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19((2), 187–229.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., et al. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370.
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2008). Attitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 940–954.
Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414.
Daniels, E., & Arapostathis, M. (2005). What do they really want?: Student voices and motivation research. Urban Education, 40(1), 34–59.
Driver, R., Leach, J., et al. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570.
HM Treasury, DfES, et al. (2004). Science and innovation investment framework: 2004–2014. London: HM Treasury.
Homer, M., Ryder, J., et al. (2011). The use of national data sets to baseline science education reform: Exploring value-added approaches. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(3), 309–325.
Jenkins, E. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710.
Kanter, D. E., & Konstantopoulos S. (2010). The impact of a project-based science curriculum on minority student achievement, attitudes, and careers: The effects of teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based practices. Science Education, 94, 855–887.
Kind, V. (2007). Context-based science: A ‘gift-horse’ for the talented? In K. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners. London: Routledge. xv, 240 p.
Kortland, K. (2005). Physics in personal, social and scientific contexts: A retrospective view on the Dutch physics curriculum development project PLON. In P. Nentwig & D. J. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant : Context based learning of science. Munchen/New York: Waxmann. 359 p.
Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922–944.
Lee, M. K., & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of science–technology–society teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1315–1327.
Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 931–960.
Mandl, H., & Kopp, B. (2005). Situated learning: Theories and models. In P. Nentwig & D. J. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context based learning of science (pp. 15–34). Munchen: Waxmann.
Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College, School of Education.
Morris, H. E. (2012). Girls’ responses to the teaching of socioscientific issues. Leeds: University of Leeds. School of Education, PhD.
Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success. The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: H. Treasury.
Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2010). Multiple aims in the development of a major reform of the national curriculum for science in England. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 709–725.
Ryder, J., & Banner I. (2013). School teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490–514.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536.
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., et al. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., et al. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.
Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction – two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151–1168.
Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410.
Zacharia, Z., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Urban middle-school students’ attitudes toward a defined science. Science Education, 88(2), 197–222.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., et al. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101.
Acknowledgements
The work reported here is one outcome of a 3 year study funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, grant number RES-179-25-0004. Thanks are extended to the teachers and students who participated in this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banner, I., Ryder, J. (2014). The Impact of a Context-Led Curriculum on Different Students’ Experiences of School Science. In: Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., Clément, P. (eds) Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7280-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7281-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)