Abstract
The major goal of this study is to present, develop, and use the concept of learning affordance, in order to understand visitors’ learning in relation to the possibilities offered by science museum environment. Participants were 7th–11th-grade students (12–16 years old) in Seoul Metropolitan area in Korea. Research site was Gwacheon National Science Museum near Seoul. Research data collected were observing and video recordings of participants while they were visiting the museum in small groups, interviews with participants, and participants’ writings after visiting the museum. The concept of learning affordance was developed as a special kind of affordance defined as the intersection of the affordance of physical environment and visitors’ intention and ability. By analyzing data qualitatively, the dynamic nature of learning affordance was identified. Learning affordance of exhibits depends on the visitors’ ability as well as exhibits’ affordances. The affordances of exhibits could be differentiated into four groups according to usefulness and perceptibility: learning affordance, hidden affordance, false affordance, and correct rejection. Creative zone was also proposed to explain visitors’ interaction with exhibits which have hidden or false affordances. The concept of learning affordance can contribute to the understanding of visitors’ learning in science museum environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Afonso, A. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Educational value of different types of exhibits in an interactive science and technology center. Science Education, 91(6), 967–987. doi:10.1002/sce.20220.
Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(S1), S17–S33. doi:10.1002/sce.20016.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Borun, M., & Dritsas, J. (1997). Developing family-friendly exhibits. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40(3), 178–196. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01302.x.
Botelho, A., & Morais, A. M. (2006). Students-exhibits interaction at a science center. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 987–1018. doi:10.1002/tea.20135.
Coffee, K. (2007). Audience research and the museum experience as social practice. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22(4), 377–389. doi:10.1080/09647770701757732.
Draper, L. (1985). Friendship and the museum experience: The interrelationship of social ties and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, New Orleans, doi: 10.1145/108844.108856.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum (Original work published 1979).
Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 205–217. doi:10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance. London: Routledge.
McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Paper presented at the Graphics Interface 2000, Montreal.
Mortime, R. E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Rahm, J. (2004). Multiple modes of meaning-making in a science center. Science Education, 88(2), 223–247. doi:10.1002/sce.10117.
Rennie, L. J., & McClafferty, T. P. (2002). Objects and learning: Understanding young children’s interaction with science exhibits. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 174–194). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rowe, S. (2002). The role of objects in active, distributed meaning-making. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 17–32). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open‐endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 121–137. doi:10.1002/tea.10068.
Von Uexkull, J. (1992). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–391.
Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705–735.
Young, M. F., Barab, S. A., & Garrett, S. (2000). Agent as detector: An ecological psychology perspective on learning by perceiving-acting systems. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 147–172). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94(3), 478–505. doi:10.1002/sce.20374.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shin, H., Park, E.J., Kim, CJ. (2014). Learning Affordances: Understanding Visitors’ Learning in Science Museum Environment. In: Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., Clément, P. (eds) Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7280-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7281-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)