Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Chemistry Teachers’ Content Knowledge: Is It Correlated to Pedagogical Content Knowledge?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Topics and Trends in Current Science Education

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 1))

Abstract

Although the construct of professional knowledge has been gained in the center stage of educational research, content knowledge as one of the main aspects is only marginally handled. While in many studies teachers’ content knowledge and its relation to other teacher characteristics are not based on a direct measurement, a large-scale test instrument for quantifying chemistry teachers’ content knowledge has been developed. The development of test items in a multiple-choice single-select format was based on a theoretical model which considers different types of knowledge, different topics, and curricular classifications. Besides evaluation of content knowledge, a scale for describing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was used and background information was collected. This study’s sample includes 166 teachers of different school types (basic general education, extensive general education, intensified general education, and comprehensive school) which show significant differences both in content knowledge and in pedagogical content knowledge. This procedure allows for revealing aspects influencing teachers’ content knowledge and information about the correlation between content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Furthermore presented results serve as a basis for discussion on teacher’s content knowledge needed in school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teachers’ knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Hill, H. H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14, 16–17, 20–22, 43–46. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65072

  • Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147–161). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Seeber, S., Lehmann, R., Kaiser, G., Schwarz, B., Felbrich, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Messung des fachbezogenen Wissens angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte. In S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer. Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare (pp. 49–88). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., Lehmann, R., König, J., Döhrmann, M., Buchholtz, C., & Hacke, S. (2009). TEDS-M: Messung von Lehrerkompetenzen im internationalen Vergleich. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, D. Sembill, R. Nickolaus, & R. Mulder (Eds.), Lehrprofessionalität. Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung (pp. 181–210). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsen, M., Bos, W., & Frey, K. A. (2008). Germany. In I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, J. F. Olson, D. R. Berger, D. Milne, & G. M. Stanco (Eds.), TIMSS 2007 encyclopedia. A guide to mathematics and science education around the world. Volume I (pp. 203–216). Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski, A., Neuhaus, B. J., Tepner, O., Wirth, J., Fischer, H. E., Leutner, D., Sandmann, A., & Sumfleth, E. (2010). Professionswissen von Lehrkräften in den Naturwissenschaften (ProwiN) – Kurzdarstellung des BMBF-Projekts. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world. What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 707–718). London: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, O., & van Driel, J. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 477–491. doi:10.1007/s10763-004-4197-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, A., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Views of inquiry: Mismatches between views of science education faculty and students of an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 716–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2010). The importance of teaching. The schools white paper 2010. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher. Teacher knowledge and teacher education (Professional development and practice series). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2012). Development of items for a pedagogical content knowledge test based on empirical analysis of pupils’ errors. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1125–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khourey-Bowers, C., & Fenk, C. (2009). Influence of constructivist professional development on chemistry content knowledge and scientific model development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Neubrand, M., Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Besser, M., & Elsner, J. (2011). Konzeptualisierung und Testkonstruktion zum fachbezogenen Professionswissen von Mathematiklehrkräften. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp. 135–161). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., & Baumert, J. (2009). Professionelle Kompetenz von Mathematiklehrkräften: Das COACTIV-Modell. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, D. Sembill, R. Nickolaus, & R. Mulder (Eds.), Lehrprofessionalität. Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihreMessung (pp. 153–165). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.502191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, S. J. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1989). Teachers’ knowledge of students’ knowledge in mathematics problem solving: Correlating and case analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 558–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2008). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Instruments zur Messung professioneller Handlungskompetenz bei (angehenden) Physiklehrkräften. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 1(2), 625–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2009). Fachbezogene Kompetenzmessung und Kompetenzentwicklung bei Lehramtsstudierenden der Physik im Vergleich verschiedener Studiengänge. Lehrerbildung auf demPrüfstand, 2(1), 104–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2009b). Structure and development of physics student teachers’ professional action competence. In: NARST (Ed.), Grand challenges and great opportunities in science education. Proceedings of the NARST 2009 Annual Meeting, Garden Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2010). Empirische Erkenntnisse zur Struktur professioneller Handlungskompetenz von angehenden Physiklehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The Place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual framework. Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepner, O., Borowski, A., Dollny, S., Fischer, H. E., Jüttner, M., Kirschner, S., Leutner, D., Neuhaus, B. J., Sandmann, A., Sumfleth, E., Thillmann, H., & Wirth, J. (2012). Modell zur Entwicklung von Testitems zur Erfassung des Professionswissens von Lehrkräften in den Naturwissenschaften. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thillmann, H. (2008). Selbstreguliertes lernen durch experimentieren: Von der Erfassung zur Förderung. Dissertation, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of models an modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1141–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahser, I. (2008). Training von naturwissenschaftlichen Arbeitsweisen zur Unterstützung experimenteller Kleingruppenarbeit im Fach Chemie. Studien zum Physik- und Chemielernen, vol 72. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpuski, M., Tepner, O., Sumfleth, E., Dollny, S., Hostenbach, J., & Pollender, T. (2012). Multiple perspectives on students’ scientific communication & reasoning in chemistry education: VISIONS 2011: Teaching. ActaDidacticaNorge, 6(1). Retrieved from http://adno.no/index.php/adno/article/view/206

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemistry Education, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Oliver Tepner

  2. Vestisches Gymnasium Kirchhellen, Bottrop, Germany

    Sabrina Dollny

Authors
  1. Oliver Tepner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sabrina Dollny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Tepner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. EA 4148 S2HEP, University of Lyon 1, ENS-Lyon, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

    Catherine Bruguière

  2. UMR ICAR, CNRS, UMR ICAR, CNRS, University of Lyon 2, ENS-Lyon, Lyon Cedex 07, France

    Andrée Tiberghien

  3. EA 4148 S2HEP, University of Lyon 1, ENS-Lyon, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

    Pierre Clément

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tepner, O., Dollny, S. (2014). Measuring Chemistry Teachers’ Content Knowledge: Is It Correlated to Pedagogical Content Knowledge?. In: Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., Clément, P. (eds) Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation