Advertisement

Identifying Evacuees’ Demand of Tsunami Shelters Using Agent Based Simulation

  • Erick Mas
  • Bruno Adriano
  • Shunichi Koshimura
  • Fumihiko Imamura
  • Julio H. Kuroiwa
  • Fumio Yamazaki
  • Carlos Zavala
  • Miguel Estrada
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 35)

Abstract

In plain areas prone to tsunami, finding a way to shelter and escape from the inundation becomes a difficult task for residents. The 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami has shown that the horizontal evacuation using cars can compromise the safety of people. Another alternative is the vertical evacuation. In many cases, not only the capacity of these shelters plays an important role, but the spatial distribution and the evacuee preference for the nearest shelter. Such preference and location creates a conflict between capacity offer and demand. In this paper, we used an agent based model to simulate the evacuation of pedestrians and cars in La Punta, Peru. Twenty designated buildings for vertical evacuation are available for sheltering and escape from tsunami. The stochastic simulation of population spatial distribution and their refuge preferences revealed the over demand of some shelters. Finally, a capacity-demand map was created to share results with local authorities as a first step for future countermeasures in the district.

Keywords

Agent based model Evacuation simulation Tsunami evacuation building Tsunami simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our deep appreciation to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and JST-JICA (Peru) for the financial support throughout the study. Also, a special thanks to the authorities and residents in La Punta for their participation and insights.

References

  1. Berninghausen WH (1962) Tsunamis reported from the west coast of South America 1562–1960. Bull Seismol Soc Am 52(4):915–921Google Scholar
  2. Chlieh M, Perfettini H, Tavera H, Avouac J-P, Remy D, Nocquet J-M, Rolandone F et al (2011) Interseismic coupling and seismic potential along the Central Andes subduction zone. J Geophys Res 116(B12):1–21. doi: 10.1029/2010JB008166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorbath L (1990) Assessment of the size of large and great historical earthquakes in Peru. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80(3):551–576Google Scholar
  4. Imamura F (1995) Review of tsunami simulation with a finite difference method. In: Long-wave runup models, World Scientific, p. 25–42Google Scholar
  5. Imamura, F. (1996) Review of tsunami simulation with finite difference method. In: Yeh, H., Liu, P., Synolakis, C. (Eds.), Long-Wave Runup Models, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore. pp. 25–42Google Scholar
  6. INEI (2007) Censos Nacionales 2007. XI de Poblacion y VI de vivienda @onlineGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuroiwa J (2004) Disaster reduction: living in harmony with nature, 1st edn. Editorial NSG, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  8. Langer CJ, Spence W (1995) The 1974 Peru earthquake series. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(3):665–687Google Scholar
  9. Mas E, Suppasri A, Imamura F, Koshimura S (2012) Agent based simulation of the 2011 great East Japan earthquake tsunami evacuation. An integrated model of tsunami inundation and evacuation. J Nat Disaster Sci 34(1):41–57Google Scholar
  10. Mas E, Imamura F, Koshimura S (2013a) Tsunami departure curves for evacuation simulation. A new approach to model the human behavior in tsunami evacuation. (under review)Google Scholar
  11. Mas E, Adriano B, Koshimura S (2013b) An integrated simulation of tsunami hazard and human evacuation in La Punta, Peru. Journal of Disaster Research 8(2):285–295Google Scholar
  12. Pulido N, Tavera H, Perfettini H, Chlieh M, Aguilar Z, Aoi S, Nakai S et al (2011) Estimation of slip scenarios for megathrust earthquakes: a case study for Peru. 4th IASPEI/IAEE International Symposium, Santa Barbara, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  13. Takahashi S, Endoh K, Zen-ichiro M (1992) Experimental study on people’s safety against overtopping waves on breakwaters. Port Harb Res Inst 31-4:3–31Google Scholar
  14. Wilensky U (2001) Modeling nature’s emergent patterns with multi-agent languages. EuroLogo, Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erick Mas
    • 1
  • Bruno Adriano
    • 1
  • Shunichi Koshimura
    • 1
  • Fumihiko Imamura
    • 1
  • Julio H. Kuroiwa
    • 2
  • Fumio Yamazaki
    • 3
  • Carlos Zavala
    • 4
  • Miguel Estrada
    • 4
  1. 1.International Research Institute of Disaster ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil EngineeringNational University of EngineeringLimaPeru
  3. 3.Department of Urban Environment SystemsChiba UniversityChibaJapan
  4. 4.Japan Peru Center for Earthquake Engineering Research and Disaster MitigationNational University of EngineeringLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations