Advertisement

Adopt Technology Acceptance Model to Analyze Factors Influencing Students’ Intention on Using a Disaster Prevention Education System

  • Yong-Ming Huang
  • Chien-Hung LiuEmail author
  • Yueh-Min Huang
  • Yung-Hsin Yeh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 260)

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of geographic information system (GIS) in disaster prevention education. Open source GIS is applied to build a disaster prevention education system used to assist students in strengthening their knowledge of typhoon prevention and enhancing awareness of typhoon disaster. An experiment which the technology acceptance model was applied as the theoretical fundamental was designed to investigate students’ intention on using the system. A total of 34 university students participated in using the proposed system. Results show that (1) perceived ease of use has a positive and significant influence on attitude toward use and perceived usefulness; (2) perceived usefulness has a positive and significant influence on attitude toward use and behavioral intentions; (3) attitude toward usage does not have a significant influence on the students’ intention to use the system.

Keywords

GIS Disaster prevention education Technology acceptance model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC 102-2511-S-041-001, and NSC 101-2511-S-432-001.

References

  1. 1.
    ISDR (2011) International strategy for disaster reduction. Retrieved 3 Apr 2011 from http://www.unisdr.org/eng/terminology/terminology-2009-eng.html
  2. 2.
    Mansourian A, Rajabifard A, Valadan Zoej MJ, Williamson I (2006) Using SDI and web-based system to facilitate disaster management. Comput Geosci 32(3):303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaluf IM, Ahmadun F, Said AM, Mustapha S, Sharif R (2002) Technological man-made disaster precondition phase model for major accidents. Disaster Prev Manage 11(5):380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker SM (2000) Environmental disaster education at the university level: an integrative approach. Saf Sci 35(1–3):95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ronan KR, Johnston DM (2001) Correlates of hazard education programs for youth. Risk Anal 21(6):1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanaka K (2005) The impact of disaster education on public preparation and mitigation for earthquakes: a cross-country comparison between Fukui, Japan and the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. Appl Geogr 25(3):201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vitek JD, Berta SM (1982) Improving perception of and response to natural hazards: the need for local education. J Geogr 81(6):225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen CY, Lee WC (2012) Damages to school infrastructure and development to disaster prevention education strategy after Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. Disaster Prev Manage 21(5):541–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13(3):319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 35(8):982–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu IF, Chen MC, Sun YS, Wible D, Kuo CH (2010) Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Comput Educ 54(2):600–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanchez-Franco MJ (2010) WebCT—the quasimoderating effect of perceived affective quality on an extending technology acceptance model. Comput Educ 54(1):37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fishbein M, Azjen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chatzoglou PD, Sarigiannidis L, Vraimaki E, Diamantidis A (2009) Investigating Greek employees’ intention to use web-based training. Comput Educ 53(3):877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). Retrieved 22 Oct 2010 from http://www.smartpls.de
  16. 16.
    Teo T, Noyes J (2011) An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling approach. Comput Educ 57(2):1645–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong-Ming Huang
    • 1
  • Chien-Hung Liu
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yueh-Min Huang
    • 3
  • Yung-Hsin Yeh
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Applied Informatics and MultimediaChia Nan University of Pharmacy and ScienceTainanTaiwan, Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Network Multimedia DesignHsing Kuo University of ManagementTainanTaiwan, Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Engineering ScienceNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations