Using Inertia Measurement Unit to Develop Assessment Instrument for Self-Measurement of the Mobility of Shoulder Joint and to Analyze Its Reliability and Validity

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 260)

Abstract

Frozen shoulder is one type of shoulder disease that is commonly seen clinically, and its main symptom is the limit in the mobility of the shoulder joint of the patient and the shoulder pain. Since its therapeutic process of rehabilitation takes a long period of time, the patient usually abandons the therapy. In addition, under the current medical situation, physical therapist usually does not have extra time and space to help each patient densely to measure the mobility of the joint and to evaluate the progress of rehabilitation, hence, the patient usually is lack of in-time feedback to understand clearly the current rehabilitation progress, which in turn results in future low willingness of the patient to take rehabilitation, eventually, the goal of early and continuous therapy cannot be reached. Therefore, the objective of this research is to develop a set of “Assessment instrument for self-measurement of the mobility of shoulder joint”, meanwhile, its reliability and validity is tested too. The system has associated wireless sensor technology and virtual reality, and the patient only has to follow the instruction and teaching on the screen to finish all kinds of standard shoulder joint actions, the progress in shoulder joint can then be evaluated at any time, eventually, the goal of real-time and self-assessment of the effectiveness of rehabilitation can be achieved.

Keywords

Wireless IMU sensor Virtual reality Frozen shoulder 

References

  1. 1.
    Codman EA (1934) The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. T. Todd Co, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neviaser JS (1945) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, a study of the pathological findings in periarthritis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 27(2):211–222Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thierry D (2005) Adhesive capsulitis. Emedicine 11:7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lundberg BJ (1969) The frozen shoulder. Clinical and radiographical observations. The effect of manipulation under general anesthesia. Structure and glycosaminoglycan content of the joint capsule. Local bone metabolism. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 119:1–59Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ (1987) The frozen shoulder. Diagnosis and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 223:59–64Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer HC, Stubblefield K, Kline T, Luo X, Kenyon RV, Kamper DG (2007) Hand rehabilitation following stroke: a pilot study of assisted finger extension training in a virtual environment. Top Stroke Rehabil 14(1):1–12Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuttuva M et al (2006) The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav 9(2):148–151Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cameirao MS, i Badia SB, Zimmerli L (2007) The rehabilitation gaming system: a virtual reality based system for the evaluation and rehabilitation of motor deficits. IEEE of Virtual Rehabilitation, Venice, Italy, pp 29–33Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hauschild M, Davoodi R, Loeb GE (2007) A virtual reality environment for designing and fitting neural prosthetic limbs. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 15(1):9–15Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rose FD et al (2000) Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics 43(4):494–511Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Central UniversityZhongliTaiwan, Republic of China
  2. 2.Taipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations