Advertisement

Research as Response: Methodological Reflections

  • Carmen Mathijssen
  • Danny Wildemeersch
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we reflect on some specific methodological challenges for research on civic learning in the context of community work with people in poverty. Important questions in this regard are as follows: what are appropriate and respectful designs, methodologies and methods for such research organised with practitioners and with people in poverty, considering both the usefulness and the democratic value of the research? This raises wider questions about the connection between research and democracy, including the question whether and how research can be a democratic force.

Keywords

Community Service Participatory Observation Rational Community Round Table Discussion Research Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Biesta, G. (1999). Radical intersubjectivity: Reflections on the “different” foundation of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18(4), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. (2002). “Preparing for the incalculable”: Deconstruction, justice, and the question for education. In G. Biesta & D. Egé-Kuehne (Eds.), Derrida & education (pp. 32–54). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. (2004). The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility. Interchange, 35(3), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder/London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Chinnery, A. (2003). Aesthetics of surrender: Levinas and the disruption of agency in moral education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Boyser, K. (2004). Sociale exclusie en ongelijkheid: Een actuele schets. In J. Vranken, K. De Boyser, & D. Dierckx (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: Jaarboek 2004 (pp. 55–88). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, C., & Berger, L. (2003). Their story/my story/our story: Including the researcher’s experience in interview research. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Postmodern interviewing (pp. 157–178). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Greenwood, D. (2002). Action research: Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges. Concepts and Transformation: International Journal for Action Research and Organizational Renewal, 7(2), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson, P. (2005). Mortality and the ethics of qualitative research in a context of HIV/AIDS. Anthropology Southern Africa, 28(3/4), 78–90.Google Scholar
  10. Hilsen, A. (2006). And they shall be known by their deeds: Ethics and politics in action research. Action Research, 4(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaspers, J., Mortelmans, J., & Willockx, D. (2007). Het nieuwe financieringsmodel Hoger Onderwijs: De Macht van het Getal. Published letter in the newspapers De Morgen and in De Standaard on 27 June 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lincoln, Y. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lincoln, Y. (1998). Commodation and contradiction in academic research. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 4(2), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lingis, A. (1994). The community of those who have nothing in common: Studies in continental thought. Bloomington: University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Loewenthal, D. (2003). The other in educational research: Some postmodern implications for educational practice, theory, research and professionalism. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 8(3), 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathijssen, C. (2008). Activeringspraktijken in de sociale economie: Een casestudy bij buurt- en nabijheidsdiensten (Online published Doctoral thesis), KULeuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/1979/2015. Accessed 29 Aug 2012.
  18. Ortega, P. (2004). Moral education as pedagogy of alterity. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortega, P., & Minguez, R. (2001). Global inequality and the need for compassion: Issues in moral and political education. Journal of Moral Education, 30(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pols, J. (2005). Enacting appreciations: Beyond the patient perspective. Health Care Analysis, 13(3), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reason, P. (2003). Action research and the single case: A response to Bjorn Gustavsen and Davydd Greenwood. Concepts and Transformation, 8(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vranken, J. (2004). Algemene inleiding: Jaarboek (13 jaar) kijkt terug op Verslag (10 jaar). In J. Vranken, K. De Boyser, & D. Dierckx (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: Jaarboek 2004 (pp. 25–52). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  23. Weil, S., Wildemeersch, D., & Jansen, T. (2005). Unemployed youth and social exclusion in Europe: Learning for inclusion? Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zembylas, M. (2005). A pedagogy of unknowing: Witnessing unknowability in teaching and learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24(2), 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Education and SocietyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations