Advertisement

Disturbing Pedagogies in Special Youth Care

  • Karel De Vos
Chapter

Abstract

Due to the ways in which social work practices in Special Youth Care are given shape in Flanders, these practices can lead to factual disengagements towards clients. This state of affairs lends itself to a postmodernist analysis of the fragmentation of professional care, along with an understanding of professionalism as expertness in risk control. Nevertheless, the assumption that children at risk grow into children and adults as a risk is not new. This idea emerged in the nineteenth century with the theory of Social Defence. Child Protection was developed as a resource to safeguard the existing social order. Private child-rearing and public interventions in child-rearing were regarded as instruments of socialisation, aimed at the realisation of integrated citizenship. Social work practices can take a distance from the socialising pedagogical logic of Special Youth Care, if they acknowledge that child-rearing and any pedagogical relation need unconditional engagements and that pedagogy and care are shaped by interdependency within pedagogical as well as care relations. This acknowledgement opens the possibility of changing the anticipations that are built in the settings and upon which social work practices in Special Youth Care rely. Those anticipations are reoriented from anticipations of the future realisation of improved citizenship towards anticipations of possible emergence of subjectified citizenship in the here and now of the relations that are developed in these settings. This reorientation makes social work practices as vulnerable as the consciousness of equal human dignity, present in the developed settings themselves.

Keywords

Social Justice Human Dignity Social Defence Risk Control Juvenile Delinquency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achterhuis, H. (1988/1979). De markt van welzijn en geluk. Een kritiek van de andragogie. Baarn: Ambo.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1963/2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a humane future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011a). Learning democracy in school and society. Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011b). Learning in public places: Civic learning for the 21st century. Inaugural lecture on the occasion of the award of the International Francqui Professorship to Prof. Gert Biesta. Ghent University, 17th Feb 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Bouverne-De Bie, M. (1991). De pedagogisering van sociale problemen. Historische ontwikkelingen in de jeugdwelzijnszorg in Vlaanderen. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Wetenschappen, 36(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  8. Bradt, L., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2009). Social work and the shift from welfare to justice. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broekman, J. M. (1991). Recht en antropologie. Antwerpen: Story-Scientia.Google Scholar
  10. De Blois, M. (1998). Self-determination or human dignity: The core principle of human rights. In M. Bulterman, A. Hendriks, & J. Smith (Eds.), To Baehr in our minds: Essays on human rights from the heart of the Netherlands (pp. 523–539). Utrecht: SIM.Google Scholar
  11. De Vos, K. (2010). Knelpuntdossiers in de Integrale Jeugdhulp: driemaal alsof. In K. De Koster, K. De Vos, D. Kerger, G. Roets, & R. Roose (Eds.), Handboek Integrale Jeugdhulp. Samenwerking- Praktijk (pp. 1–26). Brussel: Politeia.Google Scholar
  12. De Vos, K., Bouverne-De Bie, M., & Roose, R. (in press). Honderd jaar kinderbescherming. De institutionalisering van een pedagogische paradox. Panopticon.Google Scholar
  13. de Winter, M. (2011). Verbeter de wereld, begin bij de opvoeding. Vanachter de voordeur naar democratie en verbinding. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
  14. Debock, G. (1965). Beschouwingen naar aanleiding van de nieuwe wet op de Jeugdbescherming. Rechtskundig Weekblad, 29(5), 226–236.Google Scholar
  15. Donzelot, J. (1994). L’invention du social. Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Lyotard, J. F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar
  18. Mol, A. (2005). De logica van het zorgen. Actieve patiënten en de grenzen van het kiezen. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  19. Mollenhauer, K. (2003). Vergessene Zusammenhänge. Über Kultur und Erziehung. München: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Disability. Nationality. Species Membership. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  21. Papastephanou, M. (2006). Education, risk and ethics. Ethics and Education, 1, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pols, J. (2004). Good care. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.Google Scholar
  23. Prins, A. (1910). La défense sociale et les transformations du droit pénal. Bruxelles: Misch et Tron.Google Scholar
  24. Raes, K., & Coene, G. (2009). Sociale grondrechten als voorwaarden voor een gelijke handelingsvrijheid. Welzijnsgids-Algemene noden, Armoede, 72, 1–23.Google Scholar
  25. Roose, R. (2006). De Bijzondere Jeugdzorg als opvoeder. Gent: Academia.Google Scholar
  26. Smeyers, P. (2008). Child-rearing: On government intervention and the discourse of experts. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 719–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tulkens, F. (1993). Le droit pénal et la défence sociale en Belgique à l’aube du XXe siècle. Panopticon, 14(6), 485–504.Google Scholar
  28. Tulkens, F., & Morau, T. (2000). Droit de la jeunesse. Bruxelles: Larcier.Google Scholar
  29. Verhellen, E. (1996). Jeugdbeschermingsrecht. Gent: Mysch en Breesch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jongerencentrum CidarKortenbergBelgium

Personalised recommendations