Skip to main content

National, Regional and Global Radiology and Medical Imaging Referral Guidelines: Issues and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radiological Safety and Quality

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the access to and use of referral guidelines in radiology and medical imaging worldwide. The rationale; national, regional and global actions; development and implementation processes; and issues and opportunities for referral guidelines are discussed. (The discussions are related to other chapters. Please refer to the following for more detail: (a) Use of referral guidelines as a justification tool: national perspective. (b) Use of imaging appropriateness criteria for decision support during radiology order entry: the MGH experience. (c) Improving quality through lean process improvement: the example of clinical decision support).

Radiology referral guidelines are tools to assist referrers and providers towards Good Medical Practice and procedure justification by using radiology and medical imaging appropriately, thus minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure and waste of resources. The development and provision of up-to-date evidence-based contents in an innovative user-friendly package lay the foundation in a multi-stage process involving many stakeholders. For system-wide implementation, the support from the competent authorities is needed. Strong advocacy from organizations and agencies on the use of guidelines will facilitate their incorporation into policy. The active involvement and participation of the end-users along these steps will improve awareness, ownership, acceptance and use. Leadership from individual experts, organizations, and agencies by facilitating stakeholder engagement, collaboration and participation will improve guideline use leading to better patient care, safer and more appropriate use of procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American College of Radiology (2012) Appropriateness criteria. Available from http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria Accessed 30 June 2012

  2. Blackmore CC (2007) Defining quality in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4(4):217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunnick NR, Applegate KE, Arenson RL (2005) The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 intersociety conference. J Am Coll Radiol 2(5):401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission (2000) Radiation Protection 118. Referral guidelines for imaging. European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11(2):88–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. General Medical Council, United Kingdom (2012) Good medical practice. Available from http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice.asp. Accessed 14 July 2012

  8. Georgen S (2010) They don’t know what they don’t know. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Government of Western Australia (2012) Diagnostic imaging pathways. Available from http://www.imagingpathways.health.wa.gov.au/includes/index.html. Accessed 30 June 2012

  10. Image Gently (2012) The alliance for radiation safety in pediatric imaging. http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed 30 June 2012

  11. Image Wisely (2012) http://www.imagewisely.org/. Accessed 30 June 2012

  12. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA1) (2012) Radiation protection of patients. http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/index.htm. Accessed 12 Mar 2012

  13. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA2) (2012) Triple-A investment in patient health. Available from http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2010/tripleinvestment.html. Accessed 30 June 2012

  14. International Radiology Quality Network (2012) Referral guidelines project. Available from http://www.irqn.org/work/referral-guidelines.htm. Accessed 30 June 2012

  15. InsideRadiology (2012) http://www.insideradiology.com.au/. Accessed 30 June 2012

  16. Lau LSW (2006) A continuum of quality in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 3(4):233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lau LSW (ed) (2001) Imaging guidelines, 4th edn. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lau LSW, Perez MR, Applegate KE et al (2011) Global quality imaging: improvement actions. J Am Coll Radiol 8(5):330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehnert BE, Bree RL (2010) Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol 7(3):192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malone JF (2008) New ethical issues for radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129(1–3):6–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report No.160. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ng KH, Maclean ID (2011) Diagnostic radiology in the tropics: technical considerations. Semin Musculoskel Radiol 15(5):441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E et al (2009) Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19(5):1161–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  25. RadiologyInfo (2012) http://www.radiologyinfo.org/. Accessed 30 June 2012

  26. Smith-Bindman R (2010) Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med 363(1):1–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB (2008) Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 27(6):1491–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM et al (2005) Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 293(21):2609–2617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. The Royal College of Radiologists (2012) RCR referral guidelines. Available from http://www.rcr.ac.uk/content.aspx?PageID=99. Accessed 30 June 2012

  30. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2010) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes, United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valentin J (ed) (2007) ICRP Publication 105. Radiological protection in medicine. Ann ICRP 37(6). Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  32. Virtual Departments (2012) http://www.goingfora.com/index.html. Accessed 30 June 2012

  33. World Health Organization (2008) WHO global initiative on radiation safety in health care settings technical meeting report. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  34. World Health Organization (2010) World health statistics 2010. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  35. World Health Organization (2010) Medical imaging specialists call for global referral guidelines. Available from http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/medical_exposure/referral_guidelines.pdf. Assessed 30 June 2012

  36. Zhou GZ, Wong DD, Nguyen LK et al (2010) Student and intern awareness of ionizing radiation exposure from common diagnostic imaging procedures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(1):17–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Lau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lau, L. (2014). National, Regional and Global Radiology and Medical Imaging Referral Guidelines: Issues and Opportunities. In: Lau, L., Ng, KH. (eds) Radiological Safety and Quality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7256-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics