Abstract
This chapter focuses on the access to and use of referral guidelines in radiology and medical imaging worldwide. The rationale; national, regional and global actions; development and implementation processes; and issues and opportunities for referral guidelines are discussed. (The discussions are related to other chapters. Please refer to the following for more detail: (a) Use of referral guidelines as a justification tool: national perspective. (b) Use of imaging appropriateness criteria for decision support during radiology order entry: the MGH experience. (c) Improving quality through lean process improvement: the example of clinical decision support).
Radiology referral guidelines are tools to assist referrers and providers towards Good Medical Practice and procedure justification by using radiology and medical imaging appropriately, thus minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure and waste of resources. The development and provision of up-to-date evidence-based contents in an innovative user-friendly package lay the foundation in a multi-stage process involving many stakeholders. For system-wide implementation, the support from the competent authorities is needed. Strong advocacy from organizations and agencies on the use of guidelines will facilitate their incorporation into policy. The active involvement and participation of the end-users along these steps will improve awareness, ownership, acceptance and use. Leadership from individual experts, organizations, and agencies by facilitating stakeholder engagement, collaboration and participation will improve guideline use leading to better patient care, safer and more appropriate use of procedures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American College of Radiology (2012) Appropriateness criteria. Available from http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria Accessed 30 June 2012
Blackmore CC (2007) Defining quality in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4(4):217–223
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284
Dunnick NR, Applegate KE, Arenson RL (2005) The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 intersociety conference. J Am Coll Radiol 2(5):401–406
European Commission (2000) Radiation Protection 118. Referral guidelines for imaging. European Communities, Luxembourg
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11(2):88–94
General Medical Council, United Kingdom (2012) Good medical practice. Available from http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice.asp. Accessed 14 July 2012
Georgen S (2010) They don’t know what they don’t know. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(1):1–2
Government of Western Australia (2012) Diagnostic imaging pathways. Available from http://www.imagingpathways.health.wa.gov.au/includes/index.html. Accessed 30 June 2012
Image Gently (2012) The alliance for radiation safety in pediatric imaging. http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed 30 June 2012
Image Wisely (2012) http://www.imagewisely.org/. Accessed 30 June 2012
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA1) (2012) Radiation protection of patients. http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/index.htm. Accessed 12 Mar 2012
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA2) (2012) Triple-A investment in patient health. Available from http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2010/tripleinvestment.html. Accessed 30 June 2012
International Radiology Quality Network (2012) Referral guidelines project. Available from http://www.irqn.org/work/referral-guidelines.htm. Accessed 30 June 2012
InsideRadiology (2012) http://www.insideradiology.com.au/. Accessed 30 June 2012
Lau LSW (2006) A continuum of quality in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 3(4):233–239
Lau LSW (ed) (2001) Imaging guidelines, 4th edn. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Sydney
Lau LSW, Perez MR, Applegate KE et al (2011) Global quality imaging: improvement actions. J Am Coll Radiol 8(5):330–334
Lehnert BE, Bree RL (2010) Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol 7(3):192–197
Malone JF (2008) New ethical issues for radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129(1–3):6–12
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report No.160. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP, Bethesda
Ng KH, Maclean ID (2011) Diagnostic radiology in the tropics: technical considerations. Semin Musculoskel Radiol 15(5):441–445
Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E et al (2009) Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19(5):1161–1165
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (Epub ahead of print)
RadiologyInfo (2012) http://www.radiologyinfo.org/. Accessed 30 June 2012
Smith-Bindman R (2010) Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med 363(1):1–4
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB (2008) Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 27(6):1491–1502
Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM et al (2005) Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 293(21):2609–2617
The Royal College of Radiologists (2012) RCR referral guidelines. Available from http://www.rcr.ac.uk/content.aspx?PageID=99. Accessed 30 June 2012
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2010) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes, United Nations, New York
Valentin J (ed) (2007) ICRP Publication 105. Radiological protection in medicine. Ann ICRP 37(6). Elsevier, Oxford
Virtual Departments (2012) http://www.goingfora.com/index.html. Accessed 30 June 2012
World Health Organization (2008) WHO global initiative on radiation safety in health care settings technical meeting report. WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (2010) World health statistics 2010. WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (2010) Medical imaging specialists call for global referral guidelines. Available from http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/medical_exposure/referral_guidelines.pdf. Assessed 30 June 2012
Zhou GZ, Wong DD, Nguyen LK et al (2010) Student and intern awareness of ionizing radiation exposure from common diagnostic imaging procedures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(1):17–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lau, L. (2014). National, Regional and Global Radiology and Medical Imaging Referral Guidelines: Issues and Opportunities. In: Lau, L., Ng, KH. (eds) Radiological Safety and Quality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7255-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7256-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)