Advertisement

System for Reporting and Analysing Incidents

  • Catherine MandelEmail author
  • William Runciman
Chapter

Abstract

Incident reporting is a key safety tool in high-risk sectors, including healthcare. To be effective, an incident reporting system must be well constructed and reporting encouraged and supported. The presence of a fair and just culture in the workplace, where reporting is seen as a means of improving patient care, and not a tool to punish others, encourages open and honest reporting. This chapter outlines the rationales, benefits, issues, and features essential for an incident reporting system for radiology and medical imaging by using the Radiology Events Register (RaER) as an example. The challenges limiting incident reporting and the possible solutions are also presented.

Keywords

Incident report Near miss Patient safety Radiology error Risk management 

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Radiology (2012) General Radiology Improvement Database (GRID). Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety. Accessed 31 Dec 2012
  2. 2.
    Australian Patient Safety Foundation (2012) Advanced Incident Management System (AIMSTM). Available at: http://www.apsf.net.au/about.php. Accessed 31 Dec 2012
  3. 3.
    Autorité de sûreté nucléaire (2012) Available at: http://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr. Accessed 31 Dec 2012
  4. 4.
    Braithewaite J, Westbrook M, Tavaglia J et al (2010) Cultural and associated enablers of, and barriers to, adverse incident reporting. Qual Saf Health Care 19(3):229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brun A (2005) Preliminary results of an anonymous internet-based reporting system for critical incidents in ambulatory primary care. Ther Umsch 62(3):175–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cassidy CJ, Smith A, Arnot-Smith J (2011) Critical incident reports concerning anesthetic equipment: analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from 2006–2008. Anesthesia 66(10):879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Department of Health (2000) An organisation with a memory. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fukuda H, Imanaka Y, Hirose M et al (2010) Impact of system-level activities and reporting design on the number of incident reports for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 19(2):122–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galloway H, Hibbert P, Agar A (2009) Radiology events register progress report – second phase. Available at: http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/quality-a-safety/qudi/past-projects/quality-services-accredited-providers. Accessed 8 May 2012
  10. 10.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (2012) Safety in radiological procedures (SAFRAD). Available at: https://rpop.iaea.org/SAFRAD/About.aspx. Accessed 31 Dec 2013
  11. 11.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds) (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lau LSW (2007) The Australian national quality program in diagnostic imaging and interventional radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4(11):849–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawton R, Parker D (2002) Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system. Qual Saf Health Care 11(1):15–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magrabi F, Ong MS, Runciman W et al (2012) Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19(1):45–53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Audit Office (2009) Patient safety – sixth report of session 2008–2009. The Stationery Office. LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Patient Safety Agency (2004) Seven steps to patient safety: an overview guide for NHS staff Second print. National Patient Safety Agency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Patient Safety Agency (2004) Seven steps to patient safety. The full reference guide. National Patient Safety Agency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Patient Safety Agency (2005) Building a memory: preventing harm, reducing risks and improving patient safety. The first report of the National Reporting and Learning System and of the Patient Safety Observatory. National Patient Safety Agency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Patient Safety Agency (2010) WHO surgical safety checklist for radiological intervention only. In: National Patient Safety Agency “How to guide” five steps to safer surgery. Available at: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=73612. Accessed 30 Dec 2012
  20. 20.
    National Patient Safety Agency (2010) NPSA issue Europe’s first interventional radiology surgical checklist. Available at: http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/corporate/news/npsa-issue-europes-first-interventional-radiology-surgical-checklist/?vAction=fntDown. Accessed 5 May 2012
  21. 21.
    O’Beirne M, Sterling P, Reid R et al (2010) Safety learning system development – incident reporting component for family practice. Qual Saf Health Care 19(3):252–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF et al (1993) Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med 119(5):370–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (2012) Available at: http://www.rosis.info/. Accessed 30 Dec 2012
  24. 24.
    Radiology Events Register (2012) Available at: http://www.raer.org/index.htm. Accessed 8 May 2012
  25. 25.
    Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320(7237):768–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ricci M, Goldman AP, de Leval MR et al (2004) Pitfalls of adverse event reporting in paediatric cardiac intensive care. Arch Dis Child 89(9):856–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Runciman WB, Webb RK, Helps SC et al (2000) A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. II: Reviewer behavior and quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):379–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Runciman B, Merry A, Smith AM (2001) Improving patients’ safety by gathering information. Anonymous reporting has an important role. BMJ 323(7308):298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Runciman WB, Williamson JA, Deakin A et al (2006) An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification. Qual Saf Health Care 15(Suppl 1):i82–i90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R et al (2009) Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Saf Health Care 21(1):18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simon A, Lee RC, Cooke DL et al (2005) Institutional medical incident reporting systems: a review. Health Technology Assessment Unit, Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical (AHFMR) Research, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spencer PA (2012) Shared learning can help minimize errors. Available at: http://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=nws&sub=rad&pag=dis&ItemID=607379. Accessed 19 Jan 2013
  34. 34.
    The Royal College of Radiologists, Society and College of Radiographers, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, National Patient Safety Agency, British Institute of Radiology (2008) Towards safer radiotherapy. The Royal College of Radiologists, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    VA National Center for Patient Safety (2011) VHA national patient safety improvement handbook. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www1.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=2389. Accessed 30 Dec 2012
  36. 36.
    Webb RK, Currie M, Morgan CA et al (1993) The Australian incident monitoring study – an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 21(5):520–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wolf ZR, Hughes RG (2008) Error reporting and disclosure. In: Hughes GH (ed) Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    World Health Organization (2009) More than words. Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety version 1.1. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cancer ImagingPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreEast MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology, Social Work and Social PolicyUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations