Islam Online Guides Spouses Towards Marital Bliss: Arabic vs. English Counselling Perspectives on Marital Communication

  • Mona Abdel-FadilEmail author
Part of the Muslims in Global Societies Series book series (MGSS, volume 7)


‘Islam Online Guides Spouses towards Marital Bliss: Arabic Vs. English Counselling Perspectives on Marital Communication’ documents and discusses the case of, which was one of the most influential Islamic, and indeed religious websites worldwide for more than a decade. More specifically, Mona Abdel-Fadil explores what types of counselling perspectives and advice Islam Online employs when addressing marital communication problems. The focus is on the characteristics, recurring themes, and underpinning gender perspectives of the counselling. Moreover, the chapter examines how ‘Islam’ fits into the Islam Online counselling mix. Last and not least, this contribution discusses how advice provided on Islam Online Arabic and Islam Online English compare to one another, an exercise that provides some perhaps surprising results, contrary to previous scholarly assumptions that Arabic webpages would entail a more religiously conservative outlook.


Internet Islam Islam Online Gender Marriage New media Religion 


  1. Abdel-Fadil, M. 2002. Whose right to divorce in contemporary Egypt?: Competing interpretations of Islamic sources, Høgskolen i Oslo, M.Phil. 2002:2.Google Scholar
  2. Abdel-Fadil, M. 2011. The Islam-online crisis: A battle of Wasatiyya vs. Salafi ideologies? CyberOrient 5(1). Accessed 7 Feb 2013.
  3. Abdel-Fadil, M. 2012. Living ‘the Message’ and Empowering Muslim Selves: A behind the screens study of online Islam. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  4. Abduh, S. 2010. Interview with Samar Abduh, with Abdel-Fadil, M., 2 June 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Alexa. 2010. Site Info Accessed July 2010.
  6. Alkholy, K. 2009. Interview with Kawther Alkholy May 2009 with Abdel-Fadil, M., 25 May 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, J. W. 1996. On the social order of cyberspace: Knowledge workers and new creoles. Social Science Computer Review. Accessed 15 July 2010.
  8. Anderson, J.W. 2003. Redefining Muslim publics. In New media and the Muslim world, ed. D.F. Eickelman and J.W. Anderson. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bogstad, T. 2009. Mellom juridisk og religøs diskurs: Argumentasjon om islamsk skilsmisse hos Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  10. Bunt, G.R. 2003. Islam in the digital age: E-jihad, online fatwas and cyber Islamic environments. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bunt, G.R. 2009. iMuslims: Rewiring the house of Islam. Chapel Hill: The University of North California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, D. 2007. The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dawson, L.L., and D.E. Cowan. 2004. Religion online: Finding faith on the internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Eickelman, D.F., and J.W. Anderson. 2003. New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elawady, N. 2010. Trying to understand Islam online’s crisis. Accessed 14 July 2010.
  16. Ferraro, G.P. 1992. Cultural anthropology: An applied perspective. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
  17. Gräf, B. 2008. Independent, interactive, popular. Arab Media and Society. Accessed 15 July 2010.
  18. Gräf, B. 2009. The concept of wasatiyya in the work of Yusuf al-Qardawi. In Global Mufti: The phenomenon of Yusuf al-Qardawi, ed. B. Gräf and J.S. Petersen. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, J. 1992. Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Halldén, P. 2006. Militant Salafism on the internet: “” and the legacy of Yusuf al-‘Ayyiri’. In Religious communities on the internet, ed. G. Larsson. Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet.Google Scholar
  21. Hofheinz, A. 2007. Arab internet use: Popular trends and public impact. In Arab media and political renewal: Community, legitimacy and public life, ed. N. Sakr. London/New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  22. Hough, M. 2006. Counselling: Skills and theory. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  23. Irfan, H. 2009. Interview with Hwaa Irfan May 2009 with Abdel-Fadil, M., 25 May 2009.Google Scholar
  24. Islamonline. 2013. Accessed 6 Feb 2013.
  25. Kutsher, J. 2009. The politics of virtual fatwa counselling in the 21st century. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 1: 33–50.Google Scholar
  26. Mahfouz, N. 2006, March 2. Common thoughts… that steal the happiness of wives. Islam Online Arabic. Accessed 15 July 2010.
  27. Mandaville, P.G. 2002. Transnational Muslim politics: Reimagining the umma. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. 2012. Accessed 7 Feb 2012.
  29. 2013. Accessed 6 Feb 2013.
  30. Peters, R. 2005. Jihad in classical and modern Islam. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Rashid, D. 2007. The seasons of love: Spring and summer. Accessed 18 July 2010.
  32. Rowan, J. 1983. The reality game: A guide to humanistic counselling and therapy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  33. Sisler, V. 2007. The internet and the construction of Islamic knowledge in Europe. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 1: 2.Google Scholar
  34. Sisler, V. 2009. European Courts’ authority contested? The case of marriage and divorce fatwas on-line. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 3. Online. Available HTTP: Accessed 15 July 2010.
  35. Tveitereid, M. 2007. Spørsmål og svar på The University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  36. Yousef, N., and Abdel-Fadil, M. 2006. De usynlige barna. Håpets Klinikk i Kairo (The invisible children: The hope clinic in cairo), 1:74–83. Babylon: Tidsskrift om Midtøsten og Nord-Afrika.Google Scholar
  37. Zimmerman, T.S., S.A. Haddock, and C.R. McGeorge. 2007. Mars and Venus: Unequal planets. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1: 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fafo Institute for Applied International StudiesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations