Abstract
Knowledge transfer, especially its intrinsic nature, is central to research. A key concept for such inquiry has been ba (Japanese roughly meaning “place” in English), which in terms of knowledge transfer can be thought of as a shared space for knowledge creation. As defined by Nonaka and Konno (Calif Manag Rev, 40(3):40–54, 1998), ba underscores the importance of achieving dynamic interaction, but they do not analytically explain the modalities involved. The authors of this chapter outline an analytical framework for comprehending the sequence of knowledge transfer between members of professional communities and ask whether a system of global organizational knowledge exchange exists. This new topic in knowledge management raises the issue of organizational design and governance, with knowledge management possibly requiring the ability to provide appropriate spaces and animate communities of actors joined by a common spirit and identity. To link these dimensions, the authors develop a theoretical model, the hau-ba theory (Bounfour, Systèmes d’Information et Manag, 5(2):12–40, 2000; Connaissance, reconnaissance et “communautalisme” [Knowledge, recognition and “communautalism”]. In: Bounfour A (ed) Capital immatériel, connaissance et performance. L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 167–194, 2006), and explore its application to the foundry of a large aluminum company.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
When receivers do not possess enough knowledge to reciprocate with knowledge without upsetting the initial giver, then the reciprocation consists of symbols.
- 3.
The presentation of sequences and some of the subsequent developments build on our previous analysis in Bounfour, Grefe (2009: 88–89).
- 4.
In France the law permits short-term work contracts (CDDs) as opposed to contracts of undefined duration (CDIs). CDDs are not temporary missions, for the employer remains the company where the work must be accomplished.
References
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 267–300.
Alter, N. (2006). Sociologie du monde du travail [Sociology of the world of work]. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.
Balkin, D. B., & Richebé, N. (2007). A gift exchange perspective on organizational training. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 52–62.
Berthon, B. (2003). Pour une approche globale du transfert de connaissance: une illustration empirique à l’intra-organisationnel [A global approach to knowledge transfer: An empirical intraorganizational case]. Actes de Congrès de la XIIème Conférence de l’A.I.M.S., 3−6 June, Les Côtes de Carthage.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bounfour, A. (2000). Gestion de la connaissance et systèmes d’incitation: entre théorie du Hau et théorie du Ba [Knowledge management and incentive systems: Between the hau theory and the ba theory]. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 5(2), 12–40.
Bounfour, A. (2005). Modeling intangibles: Transaction regime versus community regime. In A. Bounfour & L. Edvinsson (Eds.), Intellectual capital for communities: Nations, regions and cities (pp. 3–18). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bounfour, A. (2006). Connaissance, reconnaissance et “communautalisme” [Knowledge, recognition and “communautalism”]. In A. Bounfour (Ed.), Capital immatériel, connaissance et performance (pp. 167–194). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Bounfour, A., & Grefe, G. (2009). Designing sequences for knowledge exchange: The hau-ba model. In A. Bounfour (Ed.), Organisational capital: Modelling, measuring, contextualising (pp. 76–108). London: Routledge.
Caillé, A. (2007). La quête de reconnaissance, nouveau phénomène social total [The search for recognition, a new total social phenomenon]. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
Caillé, A., Tarot, C., Dewitte, J., Rospabe, P., Larcebeau, J., Godbout, J., et al. (1996). L’obligation de donner, la découverte sociologique capitale de Marcel Mauss [The obligation to give, the fundamental sociological discovery of Marcel Mauss]. La revue du M.A.U.S.S., 8(2), 12–59.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1991). La science telle qu’elle se fait: anthologie de la sociologie des sciences de langue anglaise [Science as a dynamic process: An anthology of the sociology of sciences of the English language]. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
Boisserolles de Saint Julien, D. (2005). Les survivants, vers une gestion différenciée des ressources humaines [The survivors: Toward differentiated human resource management]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Delobbe, N., Herrbach, O., Lacaze, D., & Mignonac, K. (2005). Comportement organisationnel: Vol. 1. Contrat psychologique, émotions au travail et socialisation organisationnelle [Organizational behavior: Vol. 1. Psychological contract, emotion at the workplace, and organizational socialization]. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck.
Erden, Z., von Krogh, G., & Nonaka, I. (2008). The quality of group tacit knowledge. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 4–18.
Ermine, J. L. (2000). Les systèmes de connaissances [Information systems]. Paris: Hermès Sciences.
Fayard, P. M. (2003). Strategic communities for knowledge creation: A Western proposal for the Japanese concept of ba. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(5), 25–31.
Ferrary, M. (2003). The gift exchange in the social networks of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 45(4), 120–138.
Girod-Séville, M. (1995). Mémoire et organisation [Memory and organization]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris.
Girod-Séville M. (1996). La mémoire des organisations [The memory of organizations]. Paris, Éditions L’Harmattan, collection Logiques de gestion.
Godbout, J. T. (2007). Ce qui circule entre nous [What circulates between us]. Paris: Seuil.
Grefe, G. (2010). Les systèmes d’incitation à l’échange de connaissances au sein de communautés métiers de l’aluminium: essai d’explication d’un modèle [Incentive systems for knowledge-sharing in communities of metalworking: Attempt to explain a model]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-Sud 11, Paris.
Habib, J. (2008). Les processus de connaissance et d’apprentissage dans les projets d’innovation: une approche par les systèmes adaptatifs complexes [Processes of knowledge and learning in innovation projects: A complex adaptive systems approach]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université d’Aix en Provence, France: Marseille.
Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflict. (J. Anderson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maffesoli, M. (2005). Les mémoires des tribus et le réanchantement du monde [The memories of the tribes and the re-enchantment of the world]. In F. Casalegno (Ed.), Mémoire quotidienne, communautés et communication à l’ère des réseaux (pp. 129–146). Laval, Canada: Presses Universitaires de Laval.
Mauss, M. (1950). Sociologie et Anthropologie [Sociology and anthropology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (2003). Analyses des données qualitatives [Qualitative data analysis] (2nd ed.). Paris: De Boeck
Monnier-Sénicourt, L. (2005). Utilisation d’un système de gestion des connaissances et capitalisation; l’influence des caractéristiques professionnelles dans les métiers du conseil [Use of a system for managing and capitalizing on knowledge: The influence of professional characteristics in consulting]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Nishida, K. (1990). An inquiry into the good (M. Abe & C. Ives, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1921)
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14–37.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ba: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Osty, F. (2003). Le désir de métier, engagement, identité et reconnaissance au travail [Occupational desire, commitment, identity and recognition at the workplace]. Rennes, France: Sociétés, Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Osty, F. (2005). Identités au travail et accès à la reconnaissance [Labor identity and access to recognition]. In G. Minguet & C. Thuderoz (Eds.), Travail, entreprise et ingénierie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Osty, F., & Dahan-Seltzer, G. (2006). Le pari du métier face à l’anomie [The power of occupational activities against anomy]. Nouvelle revue de Psychologie, 2, 91–106.
Poitou, J. P. (1997). La gestion collective des connaissances et la mémoire individuelle [Collective knowledge management and individual memory]. Paris: CREPCO-CNRS.
Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Ricœur, P. (2005). Parcours de la reconnaissance [The course of recognition]. Paris: Folio, Essais.
Sainsaulieu, R. (1985). L’identité au travail: Les effets culturels de l’organisation [Identity at work: The cultural effects of the organization] (rev. & exp. 2nd ed.). Paris: Presses de la FNSP.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
Tönnies, F. (1977). Communauté et Société, Catégories fondamentales de la sociologie pure: Introduction et traduction de J. LEIF [Community and Society: Fundamental concepts in pure sociology (J. Leif, Trans.)]. Paris: Retz-C.E.P.L. (Original German work, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, published 1887)
Wilkins, A. L., & Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 468–481.
Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal (pp. 159–184). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bounfour, A., Grefe, G. (2014). Organizational Design for Knowledge Exchange: The Hau-Ba Model. In: Berthoin Antal, A., Meusburger, P., Suarsana, L. (eds) Learning Organizations. Knowledge and Space, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7220-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7220-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7219-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7220-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)