Advertisement

The Physics of Cold in the Cold War—“On-Line Computing” Between the ICBM Program and Superconductivity

  • Johannes Knolle
  • Christian Joas
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 299)

Abstract

Superconductivity—the loss of resistance in various materials close to absolute zero temperature—was a hot topic after World War II. Advances in nuclear reactor technology led to the discovery of the isotope effect in 1950 (Maxwell 1950; Reynolds et al. 1950), which brought about crucial insights about the role of electron-lattice interactions in superconductors that ultimately led to the formulation of a microscopic theory of this phenomenon. Generations of physicists had been struggling to find an explanation of superconductivity ever since its discovery in 1911 by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes.

Keywords

Nonlinear Integral Equation Quantitative Theory Absolute Zero Temperature Eliashberg Equation Hughes Aircraft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

 The authors wish to thank R. Joseph Anderson, Alexander S. Blum, Jeremiah James, Christoph Lehner, Jean Matricon, Jürgen Renn, Skúli Sigurðsson, and Georges Waysand for helpful comments and suggestions, as well as the Project on the History and Foundations of Quantum Physics (a collaborative project of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science and the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Berlin) for its generous financial support. Substantial parts of the present contribution are based on Knolle, J., Joas, C. 2013. Supraleitung und Interkontinentalraketen. “On-Line Computing” zwischen Militär, Industrie und Wissenschaft. In Physik im Kalten Krieg. Beiträge zur Physikgeschichte während des Ost-West-Konflikts, ed. D. Hoffmann and C. Forstner. Wiesbaden: Springer.

Bibliography

  1. Bardeen, J., L.N. Cooper, and J.R. Schrieffer. 1957. Theory of superconductivity. Physical Review 108: 1175–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, C.G., and A. Newell. 1971. Computer structures: Readings and examples. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Culler, G.J., and B.D. Fried. 1957. Universal gravity turn trajectories. Journal of Applied Physics 28: 672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Culler, G.J., and R.W. Huff. 1962. Solution of nonlinear integral equations using on-line computer control. Proceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference, 129–138. May 1962.Google Scholar
  5. Culler, G.J., B.D. Fried, R.W. Huff, and J.R. Schrieffer. 1962. Solution of the gap equation for a superconductor. Physical Review Letters 8: 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyer, D. 1998. TRW. Pioneering technology and innovation since 1900. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eliashberg, G.M. 1960. Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Soviet Physics JETP 11: 696–702.Google Scholar
  8. Forman, P. 1987. Behind quantum electronics: National security as basis for physical research in the United States, 1940–1960. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 18: 149–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fried, B.D., M. Gell-Mann, J.D. Jackson, and H.W. Wyld. 1960. Longitudinal plasma oscillations in an electric field. Journal of Nuclear Energy. Part C: Plasma Physics 1: 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galison, P. 1996. Computer simulations and the trading zone. In The disunity of science, ed. P. Galison and D.J. Stump. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Galison, P. 1997. Image and logic: The material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gavroglu, K., and Y. Goudaroulis. 1984. Some methodological and historical considerations in low temperature physics: The case of superconductivity 1911–1957. Annals of Science 41: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giaever, I. 1960a. Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling. Physical Review Letters 5: 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giaever, I. 1960b. Electron tunneling between two superconductors. Physical Review Letters 5: 464–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giaever, I., and K. Megerle. 1961. Study of superconductors by electron tunneling. Physical Review 122: 1101–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giaever, I., H.R. Hart, and K. Megerle. 1962. Tunneling into superconductors at temperatures below 1 K. Physical Review 126: 941–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorkov, L.P. 1958. On the energy spectrum of superconductors. Soviet Physics JETP 7: 505–508.Google Scholar
  18. Gruntman, M. 2004. Blazing the trail. The early history of spacecraft and rocketry. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
  19. Helfinstein, B. 1961. Programming manual AN/FSQ-27 (RW-400). 2nd edn., February 1, 1961. Canoga Park: Data Systems Project Office, Ramo Wooldridge. Online: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/trw/rw-400/AN-FSQ-27_RW-400_Programming_Man_Feb61.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2011.
  20. Hoddeson, L., H. Schubert, S.J. Heims, and G. Baym. 1992. Collective phenomena. In Out of the crystal maze. Chapters from the history of solid-state physics, ed. L. Hoddeson, E. Braun, J. Teichmann, and S. Weart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kaiser, D. 2006. The physics of spin: Sputnik politics and American physicists in the 1950s. Social Research 73(4): 1225–1252.Google Scholar
  22. Kevles, D.J. 1988. R&D and the arms race: An analytical look. In Science, technology, and the military, vol. XII, ed. E. Mendelsohn, M.R. Smith, and P. Weingart. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Laplante, P.A., E.P. Rose, and M. Gracia-Watson. 1995. An historical survey of early real-time computing developments in the U.S. Real-Time Systems 8: 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marcus, G. 2006. The pioneer rocket. QUEST The History of Spaceflight Quarterly 13(4): 26.Google Scholar
  25. Matricon, J., and G. Waysand. 2003. The cold wars. A history of superconductivity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Maxwell, E. 1950. Isotope effect in the superconductivity of mercury. Physical Review 78: 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McMillan, W.L., and J.M. Rowell. 1969. Tunneling and strong-coupling superconductivity. In Superconductivity, vol. I, ed. R.D. Parks. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Migdal, A.B. 1958. Interaction between electrons and lattice vibrations in a normal metal. Soviet Physics JETP 34: 996–1001.Google Scholar
  29. Morales, G.J., and F.V. Coroniti. 2003. Burton David Fried (Obituary). Physics Today 56(7): 68–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morel, P., and P.W. Anderson. 1962. Calculation of the superconducting state parameters with retarded electron–phonon interactions. Physical Review 125: 1263–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neufeld, J. 1993. Reflections on research and development in the United States air force: an interview with General Bernard A. Schriever and Generals Samuel C. Phillips, Roger T. Marsh, and James H. Doolittle, and Dr. Ivan A. Getting. Conducted by Richard H. Kohn. Washington, DC: Center for Air Force History.Google Scholar
  32. Parks, R.D. (ed.). 1969. Superconductivity, vol. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Ramo, S. 1988. Memoirs of an ICBM pioneer. Fortune 117(9): 309.Google Scholar
  34. Reynolds, C.A., B. Serin, W.H. Wright, and L.B. Nesbitt. 1950. Superconductivity of isotopes of mercury. Physical Review 78: 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowell, J.M. 1987. Superconducting tunneling spectroscopy and the observation of the Josephson effect. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 23(2): 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowell, J.M., A.G. Chynoweth, and J.C. Phillips. 1962. Multiphonon effects in tunneling between metals and superconductors. Physical Review Letters 9: 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rowell, J.M., P.W. Anderson, and D.E. Thomas. 1963. Image of the phonon spectrum in the tunneling characteristics between superconductors. Physical Review Letters 10: 334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmalian, J. 2011. Failed theories of superconductivity. In BCS: 50 years, ed. L.N. Cooper and D. Feldman. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  39. Schrieffer, J.R., D.J. Scalapino, and J.W. Wilkins. 1963. Effective tunneling density of states in superconductors. Physical Review Letters 10: 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sheehan, N. 2009. A fiery peace in a cold war: Bernard Schriever and the ultimate weapon. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Swihart, J.C. 1962. Solutions of the BCS integral equation and deviations from the law of corresponding states. IBM Journal of Research and Development 6(1): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, Z. 2008. In Sputnik’s shadow: The President’s Science Advisory Committee and Cold War America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex SystemsDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Ludwig Maximilians UniversityMunichGermany
  3. 3.Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society and Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations