Advertisement

The Richmond Birdwing Butterfly

  • Donald P. A. Sands
  • Tim R. New
Chapter

Abstract

In the early 1900s, the Richmond birdwing (at that time referred to widely as ‘the Trojan’ in northern New South Wales, and more formally considered generally to be a variety of ‘Troides priamus’, for example, by Rainbow 1907) was known to have had a patchy distribution from near Grafton and the Clarence River, New South Wales, to Maryborough, Queensland (Illidge 1898; Rainbow 2007; Waterhouse 1932; Common and Waterhouse 1981) (Fig. 2.1), thus incorporating a range far beyond the current distributional extremes for both the butterfly and its major food plant. The historical distribution was likely to have been limited in subtropical Australia, linked with the distribution of its lowland food plant, Pararistolochia praevenosa, with both food plant and butterfly dependent on the restricted climatic envelope suitable for their growth, development and reproduction. By the early 1930s the butterfly had become scarce at the northern and southern parts of the range, prompting Waterhouse (1932) to state: ‘Very few specimens are now to be found at Maryborough and Gympie…, or on the Clarence River…’ (Fig. 2.2). By 1959 the last natural breeding colony near Mary River Heads was cleared of birdwing food plants for urban development (Sands and Scott 2002) and by the mid 1980s, the small birdwing habitat patch with rainforest and food plant vines near Rainbow Beach was observed being destroyed during logging operations. In 1984, a male birdwing was seen near this site by the late Murdoch De Baar and Sands: it was probably the last individual seen in the former northern habitats between Gympie and Maryborough. Birdwing distribution had by then contracted to about two thirds of the original range and the numbers of habitat patches supporting the butterfly were declining rapidly. A recent (2011) report of birdwings seen on Clarence Peak near the southernmost recorded range margin requires confirmation, but some apparently suitable plant communities remain to the east of Grafton that may continue to support the butterfly and its food plant in some remote areas. Detailed surveys are needed to determine whether this is so.

Keywords

Food Plant Breeding Site Fore Wing Pupal Mass Larval Skin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barratt CL, Burns AN (1951) Butterflies of Australia and New Guinea. N.H. Seward, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Common IFB, Waterhouse DF (1981) Butterflies of Australia. Angus and Robertson, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Abrera B (1971) Butterflies of the Australian region. Lansdowne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  4. Feeny PP (1995) Ecological opportunism and chemical constraints in the host associations of swallowtail butterflies. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC (eds) Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Science Publishers, Gainesville, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  5. Hughes L (2006) Adult birdwings need nectar: what flowers could be their enticements? Newsletter of the Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Inc. 7: 14–17Google Scholar
  6. Illidge R (1898) List of butterflies of the Brisbane district. Proc R Soc Qld 13: 89–102 (also separately paginated in reprint: 1–14)Google Scholar
  7. Illidge R (1924b) Insect notes. Qld Nat 4:78–80Google Scholar
  8. Illidge R (1927) Brisbane butterflies of the family Papilionidae. A general account of these insects, as observed in the gardens and streets of Brisbane and its vicinity, with notes on food plants both native and introduced. (Series 1) Qld Nat 6: 33–39; (Series II) 47–50; (Series III) 55–58Google Scholar
  9. Matthews GF (1888) Life-histories of Rhopalocera from the Australian region. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 1888:137–188Google Scholar
  10. Orr AG (1994) Inbreeding depression in Australian butterflies: some implications for conservation. Mem Qld Mus 36:179–184Google Scholar
  11. Orr A, Kitching R (2010) The butterflies of Australia. Jacana Books/Allen & Unwin, Crows NestGoogle Scholar
  12. Parsons MJ (1996b) New species of Aristolochia and Pararistolochia of Australia and New Guinea. Bot J Linn Soc 120:199–238Google Scholar
  13. Pena LE, Ugarte AJ (revised ed. 2006). Las Mariposas de Chile (The butterflies of Chile). Editorial Universitaria, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Rainbow WJ (2007) A guide to the study of Australian Butterflies. Lothian, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  15. Richardson J (2009) The Richmond Birdwing (dvd). J. Richardson, KenmoreGoogle Scholar
  16. Sands DPA (1962) Papilio priamus richmondius. Communication Entomological Section of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales 13: 21Google Scholar
  17. Sands DPA, Scott S (1996) Richmond birdwing butterfly (Ornithoptera richmondia [Gray] recovery plan 1996–2001. CSIRO Dossier, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  18. Sands DPA, Scott S (eds) (2002) Conservation of birdwing butterflies. SciComEd, and THECA, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  19. Sands DPA, Scott SE, Moffatt R (1997) The threatened Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia [Gray]: a community conservation project. Mem Mus Vict 56:449–453Google Scholar
  20. Selvey H (2008) Studies of the eggs and larvae of the Richmond birdwing butterfly (Ornithoptera richmondia). Metamorphosis Aust Issue 5:15–16Google Scholar
  21. Southcott RV (1991) A further revision of Charletonia (Acarina: Erythraeidae) based on larvae, protonymphs and deutonymphs. Invertebr Taxon 5:61–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor MFJ (1984) The dependence of development and fecundity of Samea multiplicalis on early larval nitrogen intake. J. Insect Physiol 30:779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor MFJ, Sands DPA (1986) Effects of ageing and nutrition on the reproductive system of Samea multiplicalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull Entomol Res 76:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Waterhouse GA (1932) What butterfly is that? Angus and Robertson, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams CH, Twine JR (1967) Determination of nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium in plant material by automatic analysis. CSIRO Div. Plant Industry Tech Paper No 24. CSIRO, CanberraGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald P. A. Sands
    • 1
  • Tim R. New
    • 2
  1. 1.Ecosystem SciencesCSIROBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations