Mites and Biological Diversity

  • David Evans Walter
  • Heather C. Proctor


‘Ubiquitous’ is a much abused adjective that literally means ‘being everywhere’ but in practice it means considerably less. The word is often trotted out by ecologists and systematists to justify their working on a particular group of plants or animals (e.g. ‘rodents make good bioindicators because they are ubiquitous in terrestrial ecosystems’), sometimes with little support for their assertions. However, mites have a fair claim for being truly omnipresent (Fig. 11.1). With the exception of the water column of the open ocean, they exist in every sort of aquatic, terrestrial, arboreal and parasitic habitat. In spite of this, mites rarely appear in general biodiversity surveys (but see Basset et al. 2012). Data on mite diversity in tropical ecosystems is especially rare. Two interrelated reasons for this neglect, shared with other ubiquitous and ‘hyper-diverse’ taxa such as nematodes, are small body size and alleged difficulty of identification. Small-bodied organisms are often overlooked in rapid assessments of biodiversity, particularly when samples are sorted with the naked eye. Even if mites are seen, it is almost impossible to identify them to species in the field; instead, maceration, slide-mounting and microscopic examination are required.


Species Richness Mite Species Oribatid Mite Small Size Class Local Richness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Basset, Y., & 37 others. (2012). Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science, 338, 1481–1484. doi: 10.1126/science.1226727.
  2. Brown, J. M., & Wilson, D. S. (1994). Poecilochirus carabi: Behavioral and life-history adaptations to different hosts and the consequences of geographical shifts in host communities. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 1–22). New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 345, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colwell, R. K., & Naeem, S. (1994). Life-history patterns of hummingbird flower mites in relation to host phenology and morphology. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 23–44). New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Eickwort, G. C. (1994). Evolution and life-history patterns of mites associated with bees. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and volutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 218–251). New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Faris, J. A. (1996). The paradoxes of Zeno. Sydney: Avebury.Google Scholar
  7. Hammond, P. M. (1992). Species inventory. In B. Groombridge (Ed.), Global biodiversity: Status of the earth’s living resources (pp. 17–39). London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitching, R. L., Bergelson, J. M., Lowman, M. D., McIntyre, S., & Carruthers, G. (1993). The biodiversity of arthropods from Australian rainforest canopies: General introduction, methods, sites and ordinal results. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M., & Warfe, D. M. (2012). Habitat complexity: Approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia, 685, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindquist, E. E., with contributions by Ainscough, B. D., Clulow, F. V., Funk, R. C., Marshall, V. G., Nesbitt, H. H. J., OConnor, B. M., Smith, I. M., & Wilkinson, P. R. (1979). Acari. In H. V. Danks (Ed.), Canada and its insect fauna (Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, Vol. 108, pp. 252–263, 267–284).Google Scholar
  11. Loder, N., Blackburn, T. M., & Gaston, K. J. (1997). The slippery slope: Towards an understanding of the body size frequency distribution. Oikos, 78, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. May, R. M. (1978). The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas. In L. A. Mound & N. Waloff (Eds.), Diversity of insect faunas (pp. 188–204). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  13. May, R. M. (1988). How many species are there on earth? Science, 241, 1441–1449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. OConnor, B. M. (1990). The North American Acari: Current status and future projections. In M. Kosztarab & C. W. Schaefer (Eds.), Systematics of the North American insects and arachnids: Status and needs (Virginia agricultural experiment station information series 90–1, pp. 21–29). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Pérez, T. M. (1996). The eggs of seven species of Fainalges Gaud and Berla (Xolalgidae) from the green conure (Aves, Psittacidae). In R. Mitchell, D. J. Horn, G. R. Needham & W. C. Welbourn (Eds.), Acarology IX: Volume 1, Proceedings (pp. 297–300). Columbus: Ohio Biological Survey.Google Scholar
  16. Pollard, S. D., Beck, M. W., & Dodson, G. N. (1995). Why do male crab spiders drink nectar? Animal Behaviour, 49, 1443–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Proctor, H. C., Kanowski, J., Wardell-Johnson, G., Reis, T., & Catterall, C. P. (2003). Does diversity beget diversity? A comparison between plant and leaf-litter invertebrate richness from pasture to rainforest. Records of the South Australian Museum Monograph Series, 7, 267–274.Google Scholar
  18. Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Brooks, T. M. (2007). Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seeman, O. D. (2000). The immature life stages of the Fedrizziidae (Mesostigmata: Fedrizzioidea). Acarologia, 41, 39–52.Google Scholar
  20. Seeman, O. D. (2002). Mites and passalid beetles: Diversity, taxonomy and biogeography. Ph.D. thesis. The University of Queensland (p. 339).Google Scholar
  21. Seeman, O. D. (2007). Revision of the Fedrizziidae (Acari: Mesostigmata: Fedrizzioidea). Zootaxa, 1480, 1–55.Google Scholar
  22. Seeman, O. D., Proctor, H., Norton, R. A., & Colloff, M. (2001). Myriad Mesostigmata associated with log-inhabiting arthropods. In R. B. Halliday & D. E. Walter (Eds.), Acarology: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Stanton, N. L. (1979). Patterns of species diversity in temperate and tropical litter mites. Ecology, 60, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tr Treat, A. E. (1975). Mites of moths and butterflies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Walter, D. E., & O’Dowd, D. J. (1995). Beneath biodiversity: Factors influencing the diversity and abundance of canopy mites. Selbyana, 16, 12–20.Google Scholar
  26. Walter, D. E., & Proctor, H. C. (1998). Predatory mites in tropical Australia: Local species richness and complementarity. Biotropica, 30, 72–81. [this is cited as 1998b in the text, but should just be 1998]Google Scholar
  27. Walter, D. E., & Proctor, H. C. (1999). Mites: Ecology, evolution and behaviour (p. 322). Wallingford: University of NSW Press, Sydney and CABI. ISBN 0 86840 529 9.Google Scholar
  28. Walter, D. E., Latonas S., & Byers, K. (2013). Almanac of Alberta Oribatida. Part 1. Ver. 2.3. Edmonton: The Royal Alberta Museum.
  29. Walter, D. E., Seeman, O., Rodgers, D., & Kitching, R. L. (1998b). Mites in the mist: How unique is a rainforest canopy knockdown fauna? Australian Journal of Ecology, 23, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walter, D. E., Lindquist, E. E., Smith, I. M., Cook, D. R., & Krantz, G. M. (2009). Order Trombidiformes. In G. W. Krantz & D. E. Walter (Eds.), A manual of acarology (3rd ed., pp. 233–420). Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wise, D. H. (1993). Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Young, M. R., Behan-Pelletier, V. M., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2012). Revealing the hyperdiverse mite fauna of subarctic Canada through DNA barcoding. PLoS One, 7, e48755. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Evans Walter
    • 1
  • Heather C. Proctor
    • 2
  1. 1.Invertebrate ZoologyUniversity of the Sunshine Coast Royal Alberta MuseumEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations