Advertisement

Social and Economic Implications of Increasing Income Inequality: Accountability Concerns

  • Sue RavenscroftEmail author
  • Christine A. Denison
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Business Ethics Research book series (ABER, volume 4)

Abstract

Any discussion of CSR extends beyond the concept of accounting for productive capacity and operations to the broader notion of accountability. That notion includes looking at how social resources are allocated. Accountants should assume greater responsibility to help the public understand the implications of corporate behavior, especially in relation to a major social pattern, income inequality, which has created significant social problems. We look at how income distribution patterns have changed since the Great Depression and the reasons for those changes, one of which is a shift in government policies towards neoliberalism. We then suggest information that we believe should be required in corporate reports in order to help the public understand whether and how corporate behavior contributes to increased income inequality.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Gross Domestic Product Income Inequality Executive Compensation Transfer Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AAACSC (American Accounting Association Committee on Social Costs). 1975. Report of the committee on social costs. The Accounting Review, 50(Suppl), 50–89.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C.A. 2004. The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17(5): 731–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, M. 2010. Economics for the rest of us: Debunking the science that makes life dismal. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, S., J. Cavanagh, C. Collins, S. Pizzigati, and M. Lapham. 2008. Executive excess 2008: How average taxpayers subsidize runaway pay. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy. http://www.faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  5. Atkinson, A.B., T. Piketty, and E. Saez. 2011. Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature 49(1): 3–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Baber, W.R., L. Liang, and Z. Zhu. 2012. Associations between internal and external corporate governance characteristics: Implications for investigating financial accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons 26: 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayou, M.E., A. Reinstein, and P.F. Williams. 2011. To tell the truth: A discussion of issues concerning truth and ethics in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bezruchka, S. 2012. The hurrieder I go the behinder I get: The deteriorating international ranking of U.S. health status. Annual Review of Public Health 33: 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bivens, J. 2005. Truth and consequences of offshoring: Recent studies overstate the benefits and ignore the costs to American workers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, August 1. http://www.epi.org/publication/bp155/. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  11. Chang, H. 2010. 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalism. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, H., D. C. Parsley, and Y. Yang. 2010. Corporate lobbying and ginancial performance. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014264. Accessed 29 Mar 2012, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1014264
  13. Chirinko, R.S., and D.J. Wilson. 2010. Can lower tax rates be bought? Business rent-seeking and tax competition among U. S. states. National Tax Journal 63: 967–993.Google Scholar
  14. Cho, C.H., R.P. Guidry, A.M. Hageman, and D.M. Patten. 2012. Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37(1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, C., A. Goldberg, S. Klinger, and S. Pizzigati. 2011. Unnecessary austerity, unnecessary shutdown. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies, April 7. http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/unnecessary_austerity_unnecessary_government_shutdown. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  16. Collison, D., C. Dey, G. Hannah, and L. Stevenson. 2007. Income inequality and child mortality in wealthy nations. Journal of Public Health 29(2): 114–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 2011. Trends in the distribution of household income between 1979 and 2007. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.Google Scholar
  18. Cotton, J.L., and J.M. Tuttle. 1986. Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. The Academy of Management Review 11(1): 55–70.Google Scholar
  19. Dey, C. 2007. Developing silent and shadow accounts. In Sustainability accounting and accountability, ed. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, and B. O’Dwyer, 327–344. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms. American Economic Review 96(1): 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.Google Scholar
  22. Fukuyama, F. 2012. The future of history. Foreign Affairs 91(1): 53–61.Google Scholar
  23. Galbraith, J.K. 2008. The predator state: How conservatives abandoned the free market and why liberals should too. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garner, C. A. 2004. Offshoring in the service sector: Economic impact and policy issues. Economic Review. 89(3): 5–38 [Third Quarter, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City]Google Scholar
  25. Gray, R. 2002. The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(7): 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guthrie, J.P. 2000. Alternative pay practices and employee turnover: An organization economics perspective. Group & Organization Management 25(4): 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hacker, J.S., and P. Pierson. 2010. Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer – and turned its back on the middle class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, M. D., G. W. Kelly, G. B. Lockhart, and R. A. Van Ness. 2011. Determinants and effects of corporate lobbying. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1420224. Accessed 29 Mar 2012, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1420224
  30. JCT (Joint Committee on Taxation). 2010. Present law and background related to possible income shifting and transfer pricing, July 20, Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Taxation.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, J. 2008. Corporate lobbying revisited. Business and Politics 10(2): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levine, L. 2012. An analysis of the wealth across households, 1989–2010. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Available at www.crs.gov
  33. Levitt, A. 2002. Take on the street: How to fight for your financial future. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, R.L. 2011. Fixing the game: Bubbles, crashes, and what capitalism can learn from the NFL. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mattera, P., K. Tarczynska, L. McIlvaine, T. Cafcas, and G. LeRoy. 2012. Paying taxes to the boss. Washington, DC: Good Jobs First. Available at www.goodjobsfirst.org
  36. Merino, B., A.G. Mayper, and T. Tolleson. 2010. Neoliberalism, deregulation and Sarbanes-Oxley: The legitimatisation of a failed corporate governance model. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 23: 774–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan, J.P. 2011. Profits. Eye on the Market, July 11, 1.Google Scholar
  38. Owen, D. 2008. Chronicles of wasted time? a personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(2): 240–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker, L.D. 2005. Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18(6): 842–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips, K. 2002. Wealth and democracy: A political history of the American rich. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  41. Phillips, K. 2008. Bad money: Reckless finance, failed politics, and the global crisis of American capitalism. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  42. Pollin, R. 2003. Contours of descent. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Powell, L. F. Jr. 1971. Confidential memo: Attack on the American free enterprise system. http://law.wlu.edu/powellarchives/page.asp?pageid=1251
  44. Ramanathan, K.V. 1976. Toward a theory of corporate social accounting. The Accounting Review 51(3): 516–528.Google Scholar
  45. Rani, U. 2008. Impact of changing work patterns on income inequality. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inst/publications/discussion/dp19308.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  46. Rappaport, A. 1964. Establishing objectives for published corporate accounting reports. The Accounting Review 39(4): 951–962.Google Scholar
  47. Reberioux, A. 2007. Does shareholder primacy lead to a decline in managerial accountability? Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 307–324.Google Scholar
  48. Reich, R.B. 2011. Aftershock: The next economy & America’s future. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  49. Richter, B.K., K. Samphantharak, and J.F. Timmons. 2009. Lobbying and taxes. American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robison, J. 2008. Turning around employee turnover. Gallup Business Journal, (May 8). http://gmj.gallup.com/content/106912/turning-around-your-turnover-problem.aspx. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  51. Saez, E. 2012. Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (updated with 2009 and 2010 estimates), March 2. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2010.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  52. Sahadi, J. 2005. CEO pay: Sky high gets even higher. CNN Money, Last modified August 30. http://money.cnn.com/2005/08/26/news/economy/ceo_pay/.
  53. Shamir, R. 2004. The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology 30(3): 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sloan, A. 2011. Big corporations need to show us how much they pay in taxes. Fortune 164(9): 79.Google Scholar
  55. Slottje, D.J., S.A. Woodbury, and R.W. Anderson. 2000. Employee benefits and the distribution of income and wealth. In Employee benefits and labor markets in Canada and the United States, ed. W.T. Alpert and S.A. Woodbury, 349–378. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, A. 1776/2000. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library Paperback Edition.Google Scholar
  57. Soederberg, S. 2008. A critique of the diagnosis and cure for ‘Enronitis’: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and neoliberal governance of corporate America. Critical Sociology 34(5): 657–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stigler, G.J. 1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sullivan, M. A. 2010. Transfer pricing costs U.S. at least $28 Billion. Tax Notes, March 29.Google Scholar
  60. Thomas, K.P. 2011. Investment incentives and the global competition for capital. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Tilly, C. 1990. Short hours, short shrift: Causes and consequences of part-time work. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. http://epi.3cdn.net/c6374dfbf045a10c38_9gm6ivu46.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  62. Tinker, T., and R. Gray. 2003. Beyond a critique of pure reason: From policy to politics to praxis in environmental and social research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 16(5): 727–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wessel, D., and S.L. Greenberg. 2011. Big U.S. firms shift hiring abroad. Wall Street Journal 257(90): B1–B2.Google Scholar
  64. Western, B., and J. Rosenfeld. 2011. Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. American Sociological Review 76(4): 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whoriskey, P. 2011. Cozy relationships and ‘peer benchmarking’ send CEOs’ pay soaring. The Washington Post Online, October 3. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/cozy-relationships-and-peer-benchmarking-send-ceos-pay-soaring/2011/09/22/gIQAgq8NJL_story.html. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  66. Wilkinson, R., and K. Pickett. 2010. The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, D.S., and E.O. Wilson. 2007. Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 82(4): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yu, F., and X. Yu. 2011. Corporate lobbying and fraud detection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46: 1865–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zimmerman, J. I. 2011. The folly of corporate relocation incentives. The Atlantic Cities, December 16. http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2011/12/folly-corporate-relocation-incentives/737/. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations