Advertisement

Facilitation Payments in International Business Transactions: Law, Accounting, and the Public Interest

  • Cindy Davids
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Business Ethics Research book series (ABER, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter considers international dimensions of foreign bribery and the legal regimes that have been put in place to combat this problem, with a particular focus on the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. The chapter discusses a range of interwoven public interest dimensions of the problem of foreign bribery, with a particular emphasis on the continued acceptability of facilitation payments in some countries. The intersection of accounting and the problem of foreign bribery is shown to be significant in terms of the way certain forms of payment are treated – both in the accounting records of the paying country and in the taxation regimes of their home countries. Accounting “books and records” provisions are also important in the prosecution of foreign bribery matters.

Keywords

Transparency International Foreign Corrupt Practice Foreign Official International Business Transaction Foreign Public Official 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ACCA – The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. 2007. Bribery and corruption: The impact on UK SMEs. London: ACCA.Google Scholar
  2. Attorney-General’s Department. 2011. Divisions 70 and 141 of the Criminal Code Act 1995: Assessing the ‘facilitation payments’ defence to the Foreign Bribery offence and other measures, Public Consultation Paper, 15 November 2011. http://wwwcrimeprevention.gov.au/Financialcrime/Pages/Briberyofforeignpublicofficials.aspx.
  3. CAER – Corporate Analysis, Enhanced Responsibility. 2011. Anti-Corruption and Bribery Practices in Corporate Australia: A review of exposure to corruption and bribery risk across the S&P/ASX 200. Research Paper, Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  4. Carrington, P.D. 2007. Law and transnational corruption: The need for Lincoln’s law abroad. Law and Contemporary Problems 70(4): 109–138.Google Scholar
  5. Commonwealth of Australia. 1999. Parliamentary debates, House of Representatives, Daryl Williams, Attorney-General, 3 June, 6044–6045.Google Scholar
  6. Davids, C., and G. Schubert. 2011a. Criminalising foreign bribery: Is Australia’s bark louder than its bite? Criminal Law Journal 35(2): 98–115.Google Scholar
  7. Davids, C., and G. Schubert. 2011b. The global architecture of foreign bribery control: Applying the OECD convention. In Handbook of global research and practice in corruption, ed. A. Graycar and R.G. Smith, 319–339. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Director of Public Prosecutions and Serious Fraud Office (UK). 2010. Bribery Act 2010: Joint prosecution guidance of the director of the serious fraud office and the director of public prosecutions. London: Serious Fraud Office. http://www.sfo.gov.uk/media/167348/bribery%20act%20joint%20prosecution%20guidance.pdf.
  9. Ernst and Young. 2012. Growing beyond: A place for integrity. 12th Global Fraud Survey. London: Ernst and Young.Google Scholar
  10. Hardoon, D., and F. Heinrich. 2011. Bribe payers index 2011. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  11. Heimann, F., and G. Dell. 2009. Progress report 2009: OECD anti-bribery convention. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  12. Heimann, F., and G. Dell. 2010. Progress report 2010: Enforcement of the OECD anti-bribery convention. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  13. Heimann, F., G. Dell, and K. McCarthy. 2011. Progress report 2011: Enforcement of the OECD anti bribery convention. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  14. ICAEW – The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. 2010. Business and economic crime in an international context: A review of international law and practice in relation to crimes committed by or on behalf of business. London: ICAEW.Google Scholar
  15. Koch, R. 2005. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: It’s time to cut back the grease and add some guidance. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 28(2): 379–405.Google Scholar
  16. Koehler, M. 2009. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the ultimate year of its decade of resurgence. Indiana Law Review 43(2): 389–420.Google Scholar
  17. KPMG. 2010. Assistance with enquiries into matters dealing with agents in overseas territories, 29 March, KPMG, obtained from www.abc.net.au/4corners/special_eds/20100524/money/docs/KPMG_report.pdf.
  18. KPMG. 2011. Global anti-bribery and corruption survey 2011. Amsterdam: KPMG Forensic.Google Scholar
  19. McFarlane, J. 2001. Corruption and the financial sector: The strategic impact. Journal of Financial Crime 9(1): 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nichols, P.N. 2009. Who allows facilitating payments? Agora without Frontiers 14(4): 303–323.Google Scholar
  21. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2007. Bribery in public procurement: Methods, actors and counter-measures. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  22. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2009. OECD bribery awareness handbook for tax examiners. Paris: OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.Google Scholar
  23. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2011a. Convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions and related documents. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2011b. The criminalisation of bribery in Asia and the Pacific, ADB/OECD anti-corruption initiative for Asia and the Pacific. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2012. Foreign bribery factsheet. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. OECD Working Group on Bribery. 2009. Annual report 2009. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  27. OECD Working Group on Bribery. 2010. Annual report 2010. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. OECD Working Group on Bribery. 2012. Phase 3 report on implementing the OECD anti-bribery convention in the United Kingdom. Paris: OECD. March.Google Scholar
  29. OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business. 1999. United Kingdom: Review of implementation of the convention and 1997 recommendation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  30. OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business. 2011. Steps taken to implement and enforce the OECD convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  31. OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions. 2009. Recommendation of the council for further combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions. Paris: OECD. 29 November.Google Scholar
  32. Osajda, M. 2010. The FCPA and why it matters, world-check white papers, available at: www.world-check.com/whitepapers/2010. Accessed 30 Nov 2010.
  33. Riaño, J., and R. Hodess. 2008. 2008 bribe payers index. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  34. Salbu, S.R. 1997. Bribery in the global market: A critical analysis of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Washington and Lee Law Review 54(1): 229–287.Google Scholar
  35. Santangelo, B., G. Stein, and M. Jacobs. 2007. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Recent cases and enforcement trends. Journal of Investment Compliance 8(3): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schroth, P.W. 2002. The United States and the international bribery conventions. American Journal of Comparative Law 50(Supplement): 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sebelius, N. 2008. ‘Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’ (2008). American Criminal Law Review 45(2): 597–606.Google Scholar
  38. Securities and Exchange Commission [USA]. 2010. SEC charges general electric and two subsidiaries with FCPA violations media release 2010–133, July 27, available at: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-133.htm.
  39. Transparency International. 2008. Business principles for countering bribery: Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) edition. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  40. US Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. 1977. Report on the Unlawful Corporate Payments Act of 1977, 95th Cong., 1st sess., H. Rept. 95-640 (September 28, 1977).Google Scholar
  41. Zinnbauer, D., R. Dobson, and K. Despota (eds.). 2009. Global corruption report 2009: Corruption and the private sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (for Transparency International).Google Scholar

Legislation

  1. Bribery Act 2010 (UK)Google Scholar
  2. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Australia)Google Scholar
  3. Companies Act 2006 (UK)Google Scholar
  4. Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (Australia)Google Scholar
  5. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977, 15 USC§§78dd-1–78dd-3 (2006) (USA)Google Scholar
  6. Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (Australia)Google Scholar
  7. Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (Australia)Google Scholar
  8. United States Code, 15 USC (2006) (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations