Advertisement

Environmental Disclosure as Legitimation: Is It in the Public Interest?

  • Dennis M. PattenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Business Ethics Research book series (ABER, volume 4)

Abstract

In this chapter, I review evidence that explores the use of voluntary environmental disclosure as a tool of legitimacy. Legitimacy theorists argue that rather than being a vehicle for transparency and increased accountability, corporations may be using voluntary environmental reporting to enhance their image and reduce exposures to social and political pressure. The chapter presents evidence that both the level of environmental disclosure and changes in the extent of information provision appear to be related to differences in social and political exposure. I also explore in more detail the conflicting findings in the literature with respect to the relation between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure. Overall, I argue that voluntary corporate environmental disclosure as it currently exists does not appear to be in the public interest, and I offer my suggestions for bringing the practice more into alignment with what it would seem society desires.

Keywords

Environmental Performance Global Reporting Initiative Environmental Disclosure Corporate Environmental Performance Legitimacy Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aerts, W., and D. Cormier. 2009. Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Tuwaijri, S.A., T.E. Christensen, and K.E. Hughes II. 2004. The relations among environmental disclosures, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(5–6): 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, M.E., M.F. McNichols, and G.P. Wilson. 1997. Factors influencing firms’ disclosures about environmental liabilities. Review of Accounting Studies 2: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blacconiere, W.G., and D.M. Patten. 1994. Environmental disclosure, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18: 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brammer, S., and S. Pavelin. 2006. Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting 33(7–8): 1168–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, N., and C. Deegan. 1998. The public disclosure of environmental performance information – A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research 29(1): 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterji, A.K., D.I. Levine, and M.W. Toffel. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18(1): 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, C.H., and D.M. Patten. 2007. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(7–8): 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho, C.H., and D.M. Patten. 2008. Did the GAO get it right? Another look at corporate environmental disclosure. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 28(1): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, C.H., R.W. Roberts, and D.M. Patten. 2010. The language of U.S. environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35(4): 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, C.H., M. Freedman, and D.M. Patten. 2012. Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 25(3): 486–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho, C.H., R.P. Guidry, A.M. Hageman, and D.M. Patten. 2012. Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37(1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and F.P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4–5): 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and F.P. Vasvari. 2011. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30: 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 1999. Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 14(4): 429–451.Google Scholar
  16. Deegan, C. 2002. Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3): 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deegan, C. 2007. Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In Sustainability accounting and accountability, ed. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, and B. O’Dwyer, 127–149. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deegan, C., and B. Gordon. 1996. A study of environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3): 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deegan, C., and M. Rankin. 1996. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(2): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deegan, C., M. Rankin, and P. Voght. 2000. Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum 24(1): 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingwerth, K., and M. Eichinger. 2010. Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics 10(3): 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dowling, J., and J. Pfeffer. 1975. Organization legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review 18(1): 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fekrat, M.A., I. Inclan, and D. Petroni. 1996. Corporate environmental disclosures: Competitive disclosure hypothesis using 1991 annual report data. The International Journal of Accounting 31(2): 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freedman, M., and D.M. Patten. 2004. Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure. Accounting Forum 28(1): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freedman, M., and C. Wasley. 1990. The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10Ks. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3: 183–193.Google Scholar
  26. Gamble, G.O., K. Hsu, and R. Radke. 1995. Environmental disclosures in annual reports and 10Ks: An examination. Accounting Horizons 9(3): 34–54.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, R., and J. Bebbington. 2000. Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 1: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and D. Lavers. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2): 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hackston, D., and M.J. Milne. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 9(1): 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Higginson, N., C. Simmons, and H. Warsame. 2006. Environmental disclosure and legitimation in the annual report – Evidence from the joint solutions project. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 8(2): 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hopwood, A.G. 2009. Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(4–5): 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ingram, R.W., and K.B. Frazier. 1980. Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 18(2): 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeffrey, C., and J.D. Perkins. 2014. Developing corporate reporting in the public interest: Should corporate social responsibility and financial reports be integrated? In Accounting for the public interest: Perspectives on accountability, professionalism and role in society, ed. S. Mintz. 177–200. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Lindblom, C.K. 1994. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Presented at the critical perspectives on accounting conference, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Magness, V. 2006. Strategic posture, financial performance, and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19(4): 540–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGinn, D. 2009. The greenest big companies in America. Newsweekr, September 28, 2009, 34–54.Google Scholar
  37. Medawar, C. 1976. The social audit: A political view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1(4): 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Merkl-Davies, D.M., and N.M. Brennan. 2007. Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature 26: 116–194.Google Scholar
  39. Miles, R.H. 1987. Managing the corporate social environment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Milne, M.J., and D.M. Patten. 2002. Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3): 372–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mobus, J.L. 2005. Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18(4): 492–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patten, D.M. 1992. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5): 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patten, D.M. 2000. Changing superfund disclosure and its relation to the provision of other environmental information. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 1: 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patten, D.M. 2002a. Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: An examination of the impact of TRI data availability. Accounting Forum 26(2): 152–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patten, D.M. 2002b. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(8): 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shocker, A.D., and S.P. Sethi. 1974. An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies. In The unstable ground: Corporate social policy in a dynamic society, ed. S.P. Sethi, 67–80. Los Angeles: Melville.Google Scholar
  47. Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
  48. Toms, J.S. 2002. Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. The British Accounting Review 34(3): 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Verrecchia, R. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walden, W.D., and B.N. Schwartz. 1997. Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warsame, H., D. Neu, and C.V. Simmons. 2002. Responding to ‘Discrediting’ events: Annual report disclosure responses to environmental fines. Accounting and the Public Interest 2: 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Wiseman, J. 1982. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1): 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations