Abstract
The “Baldwin Effect,” named after the turn-of-the-twentieth-century American psychologist James Mark Baldwin, has experienced a revival over the last few decades, driven primarily by some cognitive scientists who think it might be able to solve problems related to the evolution of consciousness. Baldwin’s own interests when he developed the theory, which he called “organic selection,” were somewhat different from those of modern cognitivists, and his social context was enormously different. This chapter aims to recover the social challenges of Baldwin’s time and explore how they might have been related to his proposal. Chief among these challenges was the widespread perception in the United States that the massive immigrant slums in New York and other cities posed a kind of existential threat to the American way of life. This perception, in turn, led to a number of radical and disturbing eugenic proposals for meeting the “immigrant problem.” It is suggested here that, although Baldwin did not address the immigrant issue directly, it was in his mind as he developed his theory of “organic selection,” and also that it offered a way out of the crisis that many Americans thought they then faced.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Exact figures vary somewhat from source to source. Two particularly accessible and reliable sources are the Ellis Island Foundation’s own timeline (http://bit.ly/3fYIo6) and the Fordham University website on New York City History (http://bit.ly/zJpFnb).
- 3.
See Camille Avena’s essay “Progressive education in New York City” on the Fordham University website on New York City history (http://bit.ly/oyGTs2).
- 4.
Cited in Ric Burns’ (1999) “New York: A Documentary Film,” Episode 4, 34:00 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/newyork/.
- 5.
Jordan himself did not take this to be a “just criticism,” however, because, essentially, whatever is true is true, whether it lead to despair or no. He also noted that Osborn was predicting the rapid decline of Weismann’s influence in 1892. Of course, it was Osborn’s Lamarckism that rapidly declined, and Osborn himself became a eugenicist before long.
- 6.
It is easy to become distracted by the inclusion of the term “ethical” in the title of the second book, but the matter is explained in Baldwin’s autobiography (Baldwin 1926, 66–67). Essentially he added the term to the title at the last minute in order to make it more appealing to the Danish Royal Academy of Sciences awards committee. Originally the book was subtitled just “A Study in Social Psychology.”
- 7.
See Wozniak (2009) for a detailed account of the professional disaster that befell Baldwin in the wake of his arrest and resignation.
- 8.
There is little reason to believe that Baldwin’s writings had much to do with that decision. Baldwin and Woodrow Wilson had despised each other when, respectively, professor and president at Princeton. Indeed, Wilson’s high-handedness is one of the reasons Baldwin cites for having left Princeton for Hopkins in 1905. It was the “Zimmerman telegram” from Germany, urging Mexico to attack the US in exchange for a return of New Mexico and Arizona after the war that prompted Wilson to act in 1917. Incidentally, a ship on which Baldwin and his family were travelling across the English Channel, the Sussex, was torpedoed and sunk during WWI. One of his daughters was seriously wounded in the attack. A young Wilder Penfield, who would later become a leading neuroscientist in Montréal, was on the same ship, and became acquainted with the Baldwin family there.
- 9.
Though, see Baldwin’s (1902, 144–148) comments on “Social Progress.”
- 10.
Thanks to Robert Wozniak for directing me to this passage. He believes that by ‘superstition,’ Baldwin probably meant Catholicism and, if so, then he probably felt the same way about the Irish and German immigrants of the mid-nineteenth century, and the Italian immigrants of the late nineteenth as well.
- 11.
Dewey (1898) published a review of Baldwin’s Social and Ethical Interpretations, but it did not touch on the present issues either, focusing mainly on what Dewey took to be a certain theoretical confusion in Baldwin’s view between the process of developing a conscious self and the specific contents of that consciousness.
References
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1895a. Differences in children, from the teacher’s point of view [Part 1]. The Inland Educator 1: 5–10.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1895b. Differences in pupils from the teacher’s point of view [Part 2]. The Inland Educator 1: 269–273.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1895c. Mental development in the child and the race. New York: Macmillan.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1896a. A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist 30: 441–451. 536–553.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1896b. Differences in pupils from the teacher’s point of view [Part 3]. The Inland Educator 2: 126–129.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1896c. Differences in pupils from the teacher’s point of view [Part 4]. The Inland Educator 3: 232–235.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1897a. Invention vs. imitation in children [Part 1]. The Inland Educator 4: 267–271.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1897b. Invention vs. imitation in children [Part 2]. The Inland Educator 5: 58–63.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1897c. Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York: Macmillan.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1902. Development and evolution. New York: Macmillan.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1909. Darwin and the humanities. Baltimore: Review.
Baldwin, J. Mark. 1926. Between two wars, 1861–1921: Being memories, opinions and letters received. Boston: Stratford.
Cope, E.D. 1887. The origin of the fittest: Essays on evolution. New York: Appleton.
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, 1st ed. London: John Murray.
Deacon, Terrence W. 1997. The symbolic species. New York: W. W. Norton.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Dewey, John. 1898. [Review of] Social and ethical interpretations of mental development. Philosophical Review 7: 398–409.
Griffiths, P.E. 2003. Beyond the Baldwin effect: James Mark Baldwin’s “social heredity,” epigenetic inheritance, and niche-construction. In Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered, ed. Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew, 193–215. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hinton, Geoffrey E., and Steven J. Nolan. 1987. How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems 1: 495–502.
Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The modern synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
[James, William]. 1875. [Review of] Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. North American Review 121: 195–201.
Jordan, David Starr. 1892. The present battle-ground of evolution. The Dial 13 (October 16): 242–244.
Maynard Smith, John. 1987. Natural selection: When learning guides evolution. Nature 329: 761–762.
McCosh, James. 1890. The religious aspect of evolution. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Pearce, Trevor. 2010. “A perfect chaos”: Organism-environment interaction and the causal factors of evolution. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Riis, Jacob A. 1890. How the other half lives: Studies among the tenements of New York. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Romanes, George J. 1877. The scientific evidences of organic evolution. London: Macmillan.
Romanes, George J. 1882. Animal intelligence. London: Macmillan.
Romanes, George J. 1888. Mental evolution in man. London: Kegan Paul.
Romanes, George J. 1893a. Mr. Herbert Spencer on “natural selection”. Contemporary Review 63: 499–517.
Romanes, George J. 1893b. The Spencer-Weismann controversy. Contemporary Review 64: 50–53.
Romanes, George J. 1893c. A note on panmixia. Contemporary Review 64: 611–612.
Simpson, George Gaylord. 1953. The Baldwin effect. Evolution 7: 110–117.
Spencer, Herbert. 1893a. The inadequacy of “natural selection”. Contemporary Review 63: 153–166, 439–456.
Spencer, Herbert. 1893b. Professor Weismann’s theories. Contemporary Review 63: 743–760.
Spencer, Herbert. 1893c. Rejoinder to Professor Weismann. Contemporary Review 64: 893–912.
Waddington, Conrad. 1942. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150: 563–565.
Waddington, Conrad. 1953a. Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7: 118–126.
Waddington, Conrad. 1953b. “The Baldwin effect,” “genetic assimilation,” and homeostasis. Evolution 7: 386–387.
Weber, Bruce H., and David J. Depew (eds.). 2003. Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weismann, August. 1885. Die Kontinuität des Keimplasmas als Grundlage einer Theorie der Vererbung [The continuity of the germ-plasm as the principle of a theory of heredity]. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Weismann, August. 1892. Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Vererbung [The germ-plasm: A theory of heredity]. Jena: Gustav Fisher.
Weismann, August. 1893. The all-sufficiency of natural selection. Contemporary Review 64: 309–338, 596–610.
Weismann, August. 1894. The effect of external influences upon development. London: Henry Frowde, Amen Corner. (Originally delivered as the Romanes Lecture for 1894 at Oxford.).
Wozniak, Robert H. 2009. James Mark Baldwin, professional disaster, and the European connection. Rassegna di Psicologia 26: 111–128.
Wright, Chauncey. 1870. Limits of natural selection. North American Review 111 (October): 282–311.
Wright, Chauncey. 1871. The genesis of species. North American Review 113 (July): 63–103.
Wright, Chauncey. 1873. Evolution of self-consciousness. North American Review 116 (April): 245–310.
Young, Jacy L. 2009. Evolution, education, and eugenics: Organic selection in progressive era America. M.A. thesis, York University, Toronto.
Young, Jacy L. 2012. The biologist as psychologist: Henry Fairfield Osborn’s early mental ability investigations. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 48: 197–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Green, C.D. (2014). James Mark Baldwin, the Baldwin Effect, Organic Selection, and the American “Immigrant Crisis” at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. In: Barker, G., Desjardins, E., Pearce, T. (eds) Entangled Life. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7067-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7067-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7066-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7067-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)