Advertisement

Introduction: Perspectives on Entangled Life

  • Gillian Barker
  • Eric Desjardins
  • Trevor Pearce
Chapter
Part of the History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences book series (HPTL, volume 4)

Abstract

Despite burgeoning interest in new and more complex accounts of the organism-environment dyad, biologists and philosophers of biology have paid little attention to the history of these ideas and to their broader deployment in the social sciences and in other disciplines outside biology. Even in biology and philosophy of biology, detailed conceptual models of the organism-environment relationship are still lacking. This volume is designed to fill these lacunae by providing the first multidisciplinary discussion of the topic of organism-environment interaction. It brings together scholars from history, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, medicine, and biology to discuss the common focus of their work: entangled life, or the complex interaction of organisms and environments.

Keywords

Niche Construction Modern Synthesis Adaptive Landscape Ecosystem Engineering Ecological Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This collection grew out of a conference held in 2010 at Western University, entitled “Integrating Complexity: Environment and History.” The conference was made possible by the generous support of Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and the Rotman Institute of Philosophy, and by the institutional sponsorship and assistance of the International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB). We thank these bodies cordially for their support. Thanks are also due to the many members of Western University’s Department of Philosophy who helped to organize and run the conference, and the even larger number of philosophers, historians, and natural and social scientists whose participation made it a success. We wish there had been room in this volume to include many more of the stimulating papers that were presented at the conference. Finally, we are grateful to series co-editor Philippe Huneman and an anonymous reviewer for insightful suggestions, to David Isaac for editorial assistance, and to Springer’s Ties Nijssen and Christi Lue for thoughtful editing and a swift and easy publication process.

References

  1. Amundson, Ron. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of evo-devo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, Roger G. 1968. Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, Gillian. 2008. Biological levers and extended adaptationism. Biology and Philosophy 23: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonner, J.T. 1982. Evolution and development: Report of the Dahlem workshop on evolution and development, Berlin 1981, May 10–15. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Cuddington, Kim, James E. Byers, William G. Wilson, and Alan Hastings. 2007. Ecosystem engineers: From plants to protists. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Geertz, Clifford. 1963. Agricultural involution: The processes of ecological change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, James J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2000. Niche construction in biological and philosophical theories.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2001. Organism, environment, and dialectics. In Thinking about evolution: Historical, philosophical, and political perspectives, ed. Rama S. Singh, Costas B. Krimbas, Diane B. Paul, and John Beatty, 253–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Griffiths, Paul E. 2005. Review of ‘Niche construction’. Biology and Philosophy 20: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laubichler, Manfred D. 2007. Does history recapitulate itself? Epistemological reflections on the origins of evolutionary developmental biology. In From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, 13–33. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Laubichler, Manfred D., and Jane Maienschein. 2007. From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lewin, Roger. 1980. Evolutionary theory under fire. Science 210: 883–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewontin, Richard C. 1978. Adaptation. Scientific American 239: 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Longino, Helen E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Love, Alan C. 2008. Explaining evolutionary innovations and novelties: Criteria of explanatory adequacy and epistemological prerequisites. Philosophy of Science 75: 874–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayr, Ernst. 1978. Evolution. Scientific American 239: 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell, Sandra D. 2009. Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Müller, Gerd. 2007. Six memos for evo-devo. In From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, 499–524. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Odling-Smee, F. John. 1988. Niche-constructing phenotypes. In The role of behavior in evolution, ed. H.C. Plotkin, 73–132. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Odling-Smee, F. John, Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Okasha, Samir. 2005. On niche construction and extended evolutionary theory. Biology and Philosophy 20: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okruhlik, Kathleen. 1994. Gender and the biological sciences. In Biology & society: Reflections on methodology, ed. Mohan Matthen and R.X. Ware, 21–42. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pearce, Trevor. 2011a. Ecosystem engineering, experiment, and evolution. Biology and Philosophy 26: 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pearce, Trevor. 2011b. Meeting report: Fourth ISHPSSB off-year workshop. Biology and Philosophy 26: 315–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raff, Rudolf A., and Alan C. Love. 2004. Kowalevsky, comparative evolutionary embryology, and the intellectual lineage of evo-devo. Journal of Experimental Zoology B 302: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rappaport, Roy A. 1968. Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sterelny, Kim. 2001. Niche construction, developmental systems, and the extended replicator. In Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution, ed. Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths, and Russell D. Gray, 333–349. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sterelny, Kim. 2005. Made by each other: Organisms and their environment. Biology and Philosophy 20: 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wagner, Günter P. 2007. The current state and the future of developmental evolution. In From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, 525–545. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wylie, Alison. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57: 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gillian Barker
    • 1
  • Eric Desjardins
    • 1
  • Trevor Pearce
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations