Abstract
An important aspect of social norms is their internalization, after which they produce behaviour automatically, circumventing deliberation. Cognitive and emotional models of norm internalization are discussed with a major focus on recent work on cognitive agent architectures that are able to exhibit normative learning.
Tradition is a guide and not a jailer.W. Somerset Maugham
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrighetto, G., & Campenni, M. (2007). On the immergence of norms: A normative agent architecture. In AAAI symposium, social and organizational aspects of intelligence, Washington, DC.
Andrighetto, G., Campenni, M., & Conte, R. (2010). Making the theory explicit: The EMIL-A architecture. In EMergence In the Loop: Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation (Chap. 9, pp. 77–88). EMIL Deliverable 5.1 EMIL-T. http://cfpm.org/EMIL-D5.1.pdf.
CampennÃ, M., Henn, S., Jazayeri, P., Lotzmann, U., Möhring, M., Oberhausen, M., Tohum, M.-H., & Weyrich, J. (2010). Demonstrating the theory 4: Multi-scenario world – the sequel. In EMergence In the Loop: Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation (Chap. 17, pp. 191–199).
Conte, R., Andrighetto. G. & CampennÃ, M. (2013). Minding norms- Mechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies (Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fix, J., von Scheve, C., & Moldt, D. (2006). Emotion-based norm enforcement and maintenance in multi-agent systems: Foundations and petri net modeling. In AAMAS’06 (pp. 105–107), Hakodate, Hokkaido.
Lorscheid, I., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2009). How do agents learn to behave normatively? Machine learning concepts for norm learning in the emil project. In B. Edmonds & N. Gilbert (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of ESSA, Guildford, UK: University of Surrey.
Lorscheid, I., Lotzmann, U., Möhring, M., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2010). Summary of major advances in EMIL-A and EMIL-S. In EMergence In the Loop: Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation (Chap. 19, pp. 203–211).
Lotzmann, U. (2010). Demonstrating the theory 1: Traffic. In EMergence In the Loop: Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation (Chap. 14, pp. 139–147).
Lucas, P., Lotzmann, U., & Pauli, M. (2010). Demonstrating the theory 3: Micro finance. In EMergence In the Loop: Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation (Chap. 16, pp. 169–189).
Neumann, M. (2009). Dissecting the BOID perspective on norms. In B. Edmonds & N. Gilbert (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of ESSA, Guildford.
Troitzsch, K. G. (2010). Demonstrating the theory: Conclusion of scenario results. In EMergence In the Loop: Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation (Chap. 12, pp. 201–202).
von Scheve, C., Moldt, D., Fix, J., & von Luede, R. (2006). My agents love to conform: Norms and emotion in the micro-macro link. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12, 81–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elsenbroich, C., Gilbert, N. (2014). Internalisation and Social Norms. In: Modelling Norms. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7052-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7052-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7051-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7052-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)