Spatial, Generational and Gendered Trends and Trend-Breaks in Mobility

Chapter

Abstract

Long-term trends and potential trend conversions in mobility are addressed, with special focus on the Swedish population. Consistent with observations of “peak travel” reported from other countries, we find that growth in everyday travel has recently stagnated and declined. Trends differ significantly between demographic groups. At a general level, there is a tendency towards (upward) convergence between women and men and a shift in travel volumes from young to old age groups. The daily travel by young women has been rather constant, for men under 45 years old it has been reduced, and in the youngest age group the decline is substantial. The observed travel reductions among young indicate that car-intensive lifestyles may not be strongly structurally determined. The implications for sustainable travel partly depend on travel development at higher time-spatial scales. The fact that intermittent transnational mobility has grown rapidly, not least among the young age groups, suggests a substitution of international travel for national travel.

Keywords

Travel Behaviour Travel Pattern Mobility Level Sustainability Perspective Leisure Travel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this chapter was financially supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning.

References

  1. Bergström, G. (2010). Consequences of overnight work travel for personal social relations: Problems, promises and further repercussions. Mobilities, 5, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binswanger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, 36, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crane, R., & Takahashi, L. (2009). Sex changes everything: The recent narrowing and widening of travel differences by gender. Public Works Management Policy, 13, 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diekmann, A., & Priesendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frändberg, L., & Vilhelmson, B. (2003). Personal mobility: A corporeal dimension of transnationalisation: The case of long-distance travel from Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1751–1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frändberg, L., & Vilhelmson, B. (2010). Structuring sustainable mobility: A critical issue for geography. Geography Compass, 4(2), 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frändberg, L., & Vilhelmson, B. (2011). More or less travel: Personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1235–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gärling, T., & Friman, M. (2012). A behavioural perspective on voluntary reduction of private car use. In B. Van Wee (Ed.), Keep moving, towards sustainable mobility (pp. 109–134). The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Gil Solá, A. (2009). Vägen till jobbet: om kvinnors och mäns arbetsresor i förändring (The road to work: On women’s and men’s changing work trips) [Choros 2009:2]. Licentiate thesis. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, Department of Human and Economic Geography.Google Scholar
  10. Godlund, S. (1958). Data över gods- och persontransporter, särskilt på landsväg (Data on freight and passenger transport, specifically on road). Bilaga B01, SOU 1958:2, Vägplan för Sverige. Del 2. Stockholm: Kommunikationsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  11. Godlund, S. (1966). Trafikutveckling och trafikinvesteringar (Traffic development and traffic investments). Bilaga 5, SOU 1966:69, 1965 års långtidsutredning. Stockholm: Finansdepartement.Google Scholar
  12. Gustafson, P. (2006). Work-related travel, gender and family obligations. Work, Employment and Society, 20, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hjorthol, R. (2008). Daily mobility of men and women – A barometer of gender equality. In T. P. Uteng & T. Cresswell (Eds.), Gendered mobilities (pp. 193–210). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Hjorthol, R., Levin, L., & Sirén, A. (2010). Mobility in different generations of older persons: The development of daily travel in different cohorts in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 624–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kesselring, S. (2008). The mobile risk society. In W. Canzler, V. Kaufmann, & S. Kesselring (Eds.), Tracing mobilities: Towards a cosmopolitan perspective (pp. 77–102). Aldershot, UK: Ahsgate.Google Scholar
  16. Knowles, R. D. (2006). Transport shaping space: Differential collapse in time–space. Journal of Transport Geography, 14, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., & Dargay, J. (2011). A new generation: Travel trends for young Germans and Britons. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2230, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Wirtz, M., & Kalinowska, D. (2012). Travel trends among young adults in Germany: Increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kwon, T.-H., & Preston, J. (2005). Driving forces behind the growth of per-capita car driving distance in the UK, 1970–2000. Transport Reviews, 25, 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Vine, S. E., Jones, P. M., & Polak, J. W. (2009). Has the historical growth in car use come to an end in Great Britain? Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Leeuwenhorst, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Lucas, K., & Jones, P. (2009). The car in British society. London: The RAC Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.racfoundation.org/research/mobility/car-in-british-society
  22. Metz, D. (2010). Saturation of demand for daily travel. Transport Reviews, 30, 659–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millard-Ball, A., & Schipper, L. (2011). Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Transport Reviews, 31, 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2011). ‘Peak Car Use’: Understanding the demise of automobile dependence. World Transport Policy and Practice, 17, 31–42.Google Scholar
  25. Polk, M. (1998). Gendered mobility: A study of women’s and men’s relations to automobility in Sweden (Humanekologiska skrifter 17). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, Department for Interdisciplinary Studies of the Human Condition, Human Ecology Section.Google Scholar
  26. Polk, M. (2004). The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Polk, M. (2009). Gendering climate change through the transport sector. Women Gender & Research, 18(3–4), 73–78.Google Scholar
  28. Pooley, C. G., Turnbull, J., & Adams, M. (2005). A mobile century? Changes in everyday mobility in Britain in the twentieth century. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Puentes, P., & Tomer, A. (2008). The road… less traveled: An analysis of vehicle miles traveled trends in the U.S. Report from Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/1216_transportation_tomer_puentes.aspx. Accessed Oct 22, 2012
  30. Schäfer, A. (2006). Long-term trends in global passenger mobility. The Bridge, 36(4), 24–32.Google Scholar
  31. Scheiner, J. (2010). Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: Trends in Germany 1976–2002. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schipper, L. (2009). Fuel economy, vehicle use and other factors affecting CO2 emissions from transport. Energy Policy, 37, 3711–3713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thorburn, T. (1958). Sveriges inrikes sjöfart 1818–1949 (Sweden’s domestic voyages 1818–1949). Uddevalla, Sweden: Barneviks tryckeri.Google Scholar
  34. Uteng, T. P., & Cresswell, T. (Eds.). (2008). Gendered mobilities. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  35. Vilhelmson, B., & Thulin, E. (2008). Virtual mobility, time use, and the place of the home. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99, 602–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zumkeller, D., Chlond, B., & Manz, W. (2004). Infrastructure development in Germany under stagnating demand conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1864, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Economic GeographyUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations