Non-motorized Travel as a Sustainable Travel Option

Chapter

Abstract

In many developed countries walking and bicycling are not extensively used as a means of transportation. Further, the share of these non-motorized travel modes (as a percentage of all trips) has been reducing over time. The increasingly low use of walk and bicycle modes of transportation, and the concomitant increasing use of motorized vehicles for transportation, may be associated with several factors, including land use and development patterns, traffic safety and personal security concerns, and perceptions of and attitudes towards non-motorized transport. These factors manifest themselves differently in developing and developed countries, but throughout the world the increasing reliance on motorized transport contributes to serious traffic congestion problems, air quality degradation, and greenhouse gas emission increases. In addition to transportation professionals, health agencies are also paying increased attention to non-motorized modes, or “active transport” as a route to improve public health. We discuss the many benefits of non-motorized travel, identify its facilitators and impediments, analyze its utilization in select developed and developing countries, review previous studies of the effectiveness of strategies to promote it, and recommend possible pathways to promote non-motorized travel as a sustainable travel option.

References

  1. Australia Institute of Health and Welfare. (2000). Physical inactivity. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/risk-factors-physical-inactivity/. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  2. Beck, L. F., Dellinger, A. M., & O’Neil, M. E. (2007). Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: Using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166, 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belwal, R., & Belwal, S. (2010). Public transportation services in Oman: A study of public perceptions. Journal of Public Transportation, 13, 1–21.Google Scholar
  4. Bhat, C. R., & Eluru, N. (2009). A copula-based approach to accommodating residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research Part B, 43, 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhat, C. R., & Guo, J. (2007). A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research Part B, 41, 506–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat, C. R., & Sardesai, R. (2006). The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transportation Research Part B, 40, 709–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhat, C. R., & Sener, I. N. (2009). A copula-based closed-form binary logit choice model for accommodating spatial correlation across observational units. Journal of Geographical Systems, 11, 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhat, C. R., Sener, I. N., & Eluru, N. (2010). A flexible spatially dependent discrete choice model: Formulation and application to teenagers’ weekday recreational activity participation. Transportation Research Part B, 44, 903–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongardt, D., Breithaupt, M., & Creutzig, F. (2010). Beyond the fossil city: Towards low carbon transport and green growth. Paper presented at the 5th regional environmentally sustainable transport forum in Asia, United Nations Centre for Regional Development, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Consumer expenditure survey: Consumer expenditure tables. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cex/tables.htm. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  11. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. (2009). The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: A case study of Northern California. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 548–559.Google Scholar
  12. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. (2010). Neighborhood design and the accessibility of the elderly: An empirical analysis in Northern California. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4, 347–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Overweight and obesity: Data and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  14. Copperman, R., & Bhat, C. R. (2007). An analysis of the determinants of children’s weekend physical activity participation. Transportation, 34, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2010). Exploring the trip chaining behavior of public transport users in Melbourne. Transport Policy, 18, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Nazelle, A., Neiuwenhuijsen, M. J., Antol, J. M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., et al. (2011). Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environment International, 37, 766–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desmond, P. A., & Matthews, G. (2009). Individual differences in stress and fatigue in two field studies of driving. Transportation Research Part F, 12, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Environment Agency. (2006). Urban sprawl in Europe: The ignored challenge (Report 10/2006). Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  19. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Report to the U.S. Congress on the outcomes of the nonmotorized transportation pilot program SAFETEA-LU Section 1807. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/ntpp/2012_report/page06.cfm. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  21. Ferdous, N., Pendyala, R. M., Bhat, C. R., & Konduri, K. C. (2011). Modeling the influence of family, social context, and spatial proximity on use of non-motorized transport mode. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2230, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forsyth, A., Oakes, J. M., Lee, B., & Schmitz, K. H. (2009). The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others? Transportation Research Part D, 14, 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldberg, D., Frank, L. D., McCann, B., Chapman, J. E., & Kavage, S. (2007). New data for a new era: A summary of the SMARTRAQ findings linking land use, transportation, air quality, and health in the Atlanta region. Retrieved from http://health-design.spph.ubc.ca/files/2011/06/smartraq_summary.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  24. Gwilliam, K. (2003). Urban transport in developing countries. Transport Reviews, 23, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hankey, S., Lindsey, G., Wang, X., Borah, J., Hoff, K., Utecht, B., et al. (2012). Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hazen, A., & Ehiri, J. E. (2006). Road traffic injuries: Hidden epidemic in less developed countries. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 73–82.Google Scholar
  27. Heinen, E., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2011). The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D, 16, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30, 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. INRIX. (2012). Traffic scorecard by country: United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.inrix.com/scorecard/default.asp. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  30. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. (2011). Curitiba, Brazil: A model of transit oriented planning. Retrieved from http://www.ecomobility.org/fileadmin/template/project_templates/ecomobility/files/Publications/Case_stories_EcoMobility_Curitiba_PDF_print.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  31. IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. Van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 7–22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kato, T., Kawanaka, H., Bhuiyan, M. S., & Oguri, K. (2011). Classification of positive and negative emotion evoked by traffic jam based on electrocardiogram (ECG) and pulse wave. Paper presented at the 14th international IEEE conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Khan, F. M., Jawaid, M., Chotani, H., & Luby, S. (1999). Pedestrian environment and behavior in Karachi, Pakistan. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 31, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krizek, K., & Stonebraker, E. W. (2010). Bicycling and transit, a marriage unrealized. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2144, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Land Transport Authority. (2011). Journeys: Sharing urban transport solutions. Retrieved from http://ltaacademy.gov.sg/doc/JOURNEYS_Nov2011%20Revised.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  36. Lathey, V., Guhathakurta, S., & Aggarwal, R. M. (2009). The impact of subregional variations in urban sprawl on the prevalence of obesity and related morbidity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lemieux, M., & Godin, G. (2009). How well do cognitive and environmental variables predict active commuting? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Litman, T. A. (2012). Evaluating non-motorized transportation benefits and costs. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/nmt-tdm.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  39. Lovelace, R., Beck, S. B. M., Watson, M., & Wild, A. (2011). Assessing the energy implications of replacing car trips with bicycle trips in Sheffield, UK. Energy Policy, 39, 2075–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mercier, J. (2009). Equity, social justice, and sustainable urban transportation in the twenty-first century. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. (2003). Street smart: The 2002 pedestrian safety awareness campaign. Retrieved from http://www.mwcog.org/streetsmart/pdfs/SS03_summaryFinal.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  42. Ministry of Urban Development and Wilbur Smith Associates. (2008). Study on traffic and transportation policies and strategies in urban areas in India: Final report. Retrieved from http://casi.ssc.upenn.edu/system/files/GOI+2008+Traffic+Study.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  43. Mohan, D. (2002). Road safety in less-motorized environments: Future concerns. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Center for Safe Routes to School. (2011). How children get to school: School travel patterns from 1969 to 2009. Retrieved from http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/program-tools/NHTS-school-travel-1969-2009. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  45. National Household Travel Survey. (2009). United States Department of Transportation. Retrieved from http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  46. National Travel Survey. (2009). The Netherlands: Central Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.swov.nl/uk/research/kennisbank/inhoud/90_gegevensbronnen/inhoud/ovg.htm. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  47. Nygard, J., Cao, J., Csordas, S., Larssen, S., Liu, L., Strand, J., et al. (2012). Air pollution control and carbon reduction co-benefits. In A. Baeumler, E. Ijjasz-Vasquez, & S. Mehndiratta (Eds.), Sustainable low-carbon city development in China (pp. 367–384). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  48. Palmgren, F., Wahlin, P., Kildeso, J., Afshari, A., & Fogh, C. L. (2003). Characterization of particle emissions from the driving car fleet and the contribution to ambient and indoor particle concentrations. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pinjari, A. R., Eluru, N., Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M., & Spissu, E. (2008). Joint model of choice of residential neighborhood and bicycle ownership: Accounting for self-selection and unobserved heterogeneity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2082, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rahman, M. M., D’Este, G., & Bunker, J. M. (2010, July). Non-motorized public transport: A global review and analysis of trends and issues. Paper presented at the 12th world conference on transport research, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  51. Rodriguez, D. A., & Joo, J. (2004). The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transportation Research Part D, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell-Evans, V., & Hacker, C. S. (2011). Expanding waistlines and expanding cities: Urban sprawl and its impact on obesity, how the adoption of smart growth statutes can build healthier and more active communities. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 29, 63–113.Google Scholar
  53. Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. (2010). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40, 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sallis, J. F., Salelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Conway, T. L., Slymen, D. J., Cain, K. L., et al. (2009). Neighborhood built environment and income: Examining multiple health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schneider, J. (2011). Understanding sustainable transportation choices: Shifting routine automobile travel to walking and bicycling. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  56. Schrank, D., Lomax, T., & Eisele, B. (2011). 2011 Urban mobility report. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System. Retrieved from http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-report-2011.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  57. Sener, I. N., Eluru, N., & Bhat, C. R. (2009a). Who are bicyclists? Why and how much are they bicycling? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sener, I. N., Eluru, N., & Bhat, C. R. (2009b). An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, U.S. Transportation, 36, 511–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sener, I. N., Eluru, N., & Bhat, C. R. (2010). On jointly analyzing the physical activity participation levels of individuals in a family unit using a multivariate copula framework. Journal of Choice Modeling, 3, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seraj, S., Sidharthan, R., Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M., & Goulias, K. (2012). Parental attitudes toward children walking and bicycling to school: A multivariate ordered response analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2323, 56–66.Google Scholar
  61. SQW. (2007). Valuing the benefits of cycling: A report to cycling England. Retrieved from http://www.ciltuk.org.uk/download/Valuing_the_Benefits_of_Cycling.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  62. Stangl, P. (2011). The US pedestrian plan: Linking practice and research. Planning Practice and Research, 26, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Statistics Canada. (2006). The time it takes to get to work and back (Catalogue no. 89-622-XIE2006001). Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  64. Transport Corporation of India and Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. (2012). Operational efficiency of national highways for freight transportation in India. Calcutta, India: Union Cabinet Minister, Road Transport and Highways.Google Scholar
  65. Van Essen, H., & Van Grinsven, A. (2012). Interaction of GHG policy for transport with congestion and accessibility policies. Task 11 ad-hoc paper 1 produced as part of a contract between European Commission Directorate-General Climate Action and AEA Technology plc. Retrieved from http://www.eutransportghg2050.eu/cms/reports/. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  66. Wan, X., Zhang, Y., Jin, P. J., Ran, B., Wang, W., & Chen, J. (2011). Same-day mode choice modeling with household vehicle usage simulation in developing countries. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2239, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Westerdahl, D., Wang, X., Pan, X., & Zhang, K. M. (2009). Characterization of on-road vehicle emission factors and microenvironmental air quality in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Winters, M., Brauer, M., Setton, E. M., & Teschke, K. (2010). Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 87, 969–993.Google Scholar
  69. World Bank. (2011, July). World development indicators database. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators/wdi-2011. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  70. Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Maghelal, P., Prelog, A., & Lacy, M. (2008). Cycling and walking: Explaining the spatial distribution of healthy modes of transportation in the United States. Transportation Research Part D, 13, 464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhu, C., Zhu, Y., Lu, R., He, R., & Xia, Z. (2012). Perceptions and aspirations for car ownership among Chinese students attending two universities in the Yangtze Delta, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations