Skip to main content

Do Future Land-Use Policies Increase Sustainable Travel?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Land-use policies are argued by both researchers and policy makers to be a strategy for reducing negative impacts on the environment through reduced motorized-vehicle travel. But does research support this argument? In this context we discuss whether land-use policies make sense as a strategy for reducing motorized travel and lessening environmental impacts. We focus on the following propositions with respect to daily household travel: (1) Land-use policies can have a significant effect on travel behaviour depending on the scope and scale of the policies and on the particular context of the effort; (2) Even when land-use policies have a minimal effect on travel behaviour they confer benefits in the form of accessibility improvements, and; (3) Land-use policies should be evaluated for a much broader range of benefits rather than changes in travel behaviour alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, W. P., Kanaroglou, P. S., & Miller, E. J. (1996). Urban form, energy and the environment: A review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Studies, 33, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D., & Berechman, J. (2000). Transport investment and economic development. London: University College London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M. (2011). A broader context for land use and travel behavior, and a research agenda. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77, 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M. G., Day, K., Anderson, C., McMillan, T., & Alfonzo, M. (2005). California’s safe routes to school program: Impacts on walking, bicycling, and pedestrian safety. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. (2009). Examining the impact of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29, 359–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (2004). The built environment and travel: Evidence from the United States. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3, 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (2006). Alternative approaches to modelling the travel-demand impacts of smart growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, F. M. (2001). Modelling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Powell, K. E., & Chapman, J. E. (2007). Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighbourhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1898–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurs, K., Haaijer, R., & Van Wee, B. (2006). Option value of public transport: Methodology for measurement and case study for regional rail links in the Netherlands. Transport Reviews, 26, 613–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurs, K. T., & Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G. (1989). New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A, 21, 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. (1989). Gasoline consumption and cities: A reply. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 342–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. (1996). Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part D, 1, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meurs, H., & Van Wee, B. (2004). Land use and mobility: A synthesis of findings and policy implications. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2, 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, P., & Chen, C. (2004). TTB or not TTB that is the question: a review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets. Transportation Research Part A, 38, 643–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1988). The transport energy trade-off: Fuel efficient traffic versus fuel-efficient cities. Transportation Research Part A, 22, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeier, D., Bao, S., & Handy, S. (2011). The impact of residential growth patterns on vehicle travel and pollutant emissions. Journal of Transportation and Land Use, 4, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • SACTRA. (1999). Transport and the economy. The standing advisory committee on trunk road assessment. London: Department of the Environment, Department of Transport and the Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saelensminde, K. (2004). Cost–benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic. Transportation Research Part A, 38, 593–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salon, D., Boarnet, M., Handy, S., Spears, S., & Tal G. (2011). How do local actions affect VMT? A critical view of the empirical evidence. Paper presented at the 91st annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., & Dieleman, F. M. (2002). A microlevel analysis of residential context and travel time. Environment and Planning A, 34, 1487–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wee, B. (2002). Land use and transport: Research and policy challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wee, B. (2011). Evaluating the impact of land use on travel behaviour: The environment versus accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1530–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is based on a paper written for the European Metropolitan Network Institute (EMI). We thank Sietske Voorn for her support and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert van Wee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Wee, B., Handy, S. (2014). Do Future Land-Use Policies Increase Sustainable Travel?. In: Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M. (eds) Handbook of Sustainable Travel. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7034-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics