Skip to main content

Patterns of University Governance: Insights Based on an Analysis of Doctoral Education’s Management Reform

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Higher Education

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 41))

  • 1581 Accesses

Abstract

For a long time, studies on public management have underlined the central role of new public management (NPM) and neglected other new forms of public management. Kickert (Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe. Edward Elgar Publications, Cheltenham/Lyme, 1997) developed an alternative, the network governance (NG) narrative. With reference to a number of central NPM and NG elements, this chapter analyzes the management reform of Swiss and Norwegian doctoral education in the last 10 years by taking into account four variables, namely type of national political system (federal vs. centralized), disciplinary profile (specialist vs. generalist), size of higher education institutions (HEIs) and the type of scientific discipline (soft vs. hard and pure vs. applied). Thus, it examines the extent to which elements of one or other of the public management narratives appear according to the four variables. On the basis of this analysis, the following thesis composed of two ideal types can be posited: on the one hand, elements of NPM have the best chance of application in the case of hard and applied sciences situated in small, specialist HEIs within centralized countries. On the other hand, it is the NG narrative which is likely to apply to soft pure sciences situated in larger, generalist HEIs of federal countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Only the male gender is used in the interests of brevity.

  2. 2.

    Varying denominations appear in higher education studies and political documents. Besides the mentioned terms, “research school”— especially in Nordic countries—or “graduate school” are also in use. The term “graduate school” may be particularly misleading because in its country of origin, the USA, it includes both the master and doctoral levels, whereas in many European HEIs it is limited to the doctoral level.

  3. 3.

    According to Ferlie et al. (2009), new public management and network governance are not purely analytical and theoretical frameworks aiming at comprehension (in the Weberian sense), yet they both mix technical, political and normative elements. They are therefore called narratives.

  4. 4.

    The idea of the “Governance Equalizer” consists in the consideration that a change in one governance dimension does not necessarily directly influence a change in another governance dimension. For instance, less state regulation does not necessarily imply more market orientation. Hence, rather than suggesting a governance model which puts different dimensions in direct relation, de Boer et al. (2008) suggest an equalizer containing several dimensions, each of which can increase or decrease more or less independently of the others.

References

  • Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multi-level governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baschung, L. (2013). Doctoral educations’s reform in Switzerland and Norway. A public management analysis. Bern/Berlin/Bruxelles/Frankfurt am Main/New York/Oxford/Wien: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. (1999). Changing governance models in higher education: The case of the new managerialism. Swiss Political Science Review, 5(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Introduction – Theoretical approach and research questions. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Transcending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms (pp. 1–15). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2008). Chapter 3. Comparing higher education governance systems in four European countries. In N. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 35–54). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism. The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G.-L. (2009). The steering of higher education systems. A public management perspective. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), University governance. Western European comparative perspectives (pp. 1–19). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras, Y., & Gemme, B. (2006). L’emprise du champ scientifique sur le champ universitaire et ses effets. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 164, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America: A comparative analysis. In U. Teichler (Ed.), The formative years of scholars (pp. 67–78). London: Portland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (1997). Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham/Lyme: Edward Elgar Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, B., Baschung, L., & Probst, C. (2010). Patterns of subject mix in higher education institutions: A first empirical analysis using the AQUAMETH database. Minerva, 48, 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (2003). Introduction. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mora, J. G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform. A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, U. (2005). New public management’ and the academic profession: Reflections on the German situation. Minerva, 43(4), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Baschung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baschung, L. (2014). Patterns of University Governance: Insights Based on an Analysis of Doctoral Education’s Management Reform. In: Musselin, C., Teixeira, P. (eds) Reforming Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7028-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics